Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:25 last edited by
When it comes to testimony, I bet Joe is real good at forgetting.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:34 last edited by
SCOTUS denies for lack of standing.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:43 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Nov 2020, 23:43
7-2. All the Trump appointees voted no standing.
Even Alito and Thomas were going to provide no relief, just didn’t think the court could deny standing under “original jurisdiction” cases.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:46 last edited by
Yes, it's pretty much over. Trump tried his best to save the country, but it isn't going to happen. The democrats have stolen the election, and Biden will be sworn in to office.
The sad part of this is all those real Americans who actually voted are going to have to suffer the consequences of this coup. Everyone might as well go ahead and submit to their coming new rulers - the CCP.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:48 last edited by xenon 12 Nov 2020, 23:52
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
The democrats have stolen the election
Which ones? As in - Joe did it?
If you truly believe this - you believe that one of the greatest crime against the United States has just been perpetrated.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:00 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Dec 2020, 00:00
From a lawyer who is also the spouse of the former Texas Solicitor General and former Alito clerk:
From a wise friend: So, just so I understand what the Alito/Thomas blurb is about, SCOTUS is effectively saying “get the eff off my lawn” while Alito/Thomas are like “you’re welcome to ring the doorbell but no way are we opening the door to you weirdos?” EXACTLY
-
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.
JULY 30th:
Formal election predictions in regards to the following:1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions
You also missed question 6.
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:03 last edited by@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.
JULY 30th:
Formal election predictions in regards to the following:1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions
You also missed question 6.
Which part? We knew Biden won before thanksgiving, actually 19 days prior, on Nov 7th.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:05 last edited by
Even Alito and Thomas said they wouldn’t have granted relief, just that the court is required to take original jurisdiction cases.
They didn’t have to add the part about ‘we wouldn’t have granted relief’.
In that sense is was a 9-0 fuck you.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:11 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:16 last edited by
If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!
-
If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:19 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!
Please show your work.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:19 last edited by
So sad. The only choice now is to buy the condo in Trump’s new development in Costa Rica where he is planning on recreating the True United States of America (tm)
-
So sad. The only choice now is to buy the condo in Trump’s new development in Costa Rica where he is planning on recreating the True United States of America (tm)
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:23 last edited byOne cannot debate someone who is invincibly ignorant.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:30 last edited by
That’s why watching you and Larry go back and forth is so much fun...
-
That’s why watching you and Larry go back and forth is so much fun...
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:32 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
That’s why watching you and Larry go back and forth is so much fun...
Larry is not going to like it that you believe he is ignorant.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:33 last edited by
It’s like watching two kittens foght over the laser pointer for.
-
It’s like watching two kittens foght over the laser pointer for.
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:38 last edited by -
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 01:45 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Dec 2020, 01:46
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 01:46 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 01:47 last edited by
Hell no, no one’s wearing masks.