Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit

Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
178 Posts 22 Posters 3.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Larry
    11 Dec 2020, 23:17

    Ax, what do you think about Eric The Fart Swalwell getting caught with Chinese spies? Biden and his son have been under criminal investigation since 2015, for allegedly selling influence to China. Now we know that several democrats are in bed with the Chinese Communist party, selling our country out to line their own pockets, you ignore all that and the millions of dollars involved but complain about where Trumps campaign money gets spent. So it begs the question - do you hate American too, or are you just stupid? It's one or the other, there are no other options for you.

    G Offline
    G Offline
    George K
    wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:18 last edited by
    #63

    @Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

    Biden and his son

    AFAIK, Joe hasn't been under criminal investigation.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • L Offline
      L Offline
      Larry
      wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:20 last edited by
      #64

      YET. He will be soon.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • C Offline
        C Offline
        Copper
        wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:25 last edited by
        #65

        When it comes to testimony, I bet Joe is real good at forgetting.

        A 1 Reply Last reply 12 Dec 2020, 08:04
        • G Offline
          G Offline
          George K
          wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:34 last edited by
          #66

          SCOTUS denies for lack of standing.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • J Offline
            J Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:43 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Nov 2020, 23:43
            #67

            7-2. All the Trump appointees voted no standing.

            Even Alito and Thomas were going to provide no relief, just didn’t think the court could deny standing under “original jurisdiction” cases.

            Only non-witches get due process.

            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
            1 Reply Last reply
            • L Offline
              L Offline
              Larry
              wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:46 last edited by
              #68

              Yes, it's pretty much over. Trump tried his best to save the country, but it isn't going to happen. The democrats have stolen the election, and Biden will be sworn in to office.

              The sad part of this is all those real Americans who actually voted are going to have to suffer the consequences of this coup. Everyone might as well go ahead and submit to their coming new rulers - the CCP.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • X Offline
                X Offline
                xenon
                wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:48 last edited by xenon 12 Nov 2020, 23:52
                #69

                @Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                The democrats have stolen the election

                Which ones? As in - Joe did it?

                If you truly believe this - you believe that one of the greatest crime against the United States has just been perpetrated.

                L 1 Reply Last reply 12 Dec 2020, 01:51
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:00 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Dec 2020, 00:00
                  #70

                  From a lawyer who is also the spouse of the former Texas Solicitor General and former Alito clerk:

                  From a wise friend: So, just so I understand what the Alito/Thomas blurb is about, SCOTUS is effectively saying “get the eff off my lawn” while Alito/Thomas are like “you’re welcome to ring the doorbell but no way are we opening the door to you weirdos?” EXACTLY 🔥

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • L Larry
                    11 Dec 2020, 20:01

                    @89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.

                    You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.

                    Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.

                    No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.

                    Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.

                    JULY 30th:
                    Formal election predictions in regards to the following:

                    1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
                    2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
                    3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
                    4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
                    5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
                    6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.

                    https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions

                    You also missed question 6.

                    8 Offline
                    8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:03 last edited by
                    #71

                    @Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                    @Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.

                    You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.

                    Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.

                    No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.

                    Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.

                    JULY 30th:
                    Formal election predictions in regards to the following:

                    1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
                    2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
                    3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
                    4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
                    5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
                    6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.

                    https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions

                    You also missed question 6.

                    Which part? We knew Biden won before thanksgiving, actually 19 days prior, on Nov 7th.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply 12 Dec 2020, 02:00
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:05 last edited by
                      #72

                      Even Alito and Thomas said they wouldn’t have granted relief, just that the court is required to take original jurisdiction cases.

                      They didn’t have to add the part about ‘we wouldn’t have granted relief’.

                      In that sense is was a 9-0 fuck you.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • J Offline
                        J Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:11 last edited by
                        #73

                        EB787247-1D69-4023-B46A-59DE42C0FE43.jpeg

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:16 last edited by
                          #74

                          If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          G 1 Reply Last reply 12 Dec 2020, 00:19
                          • J jon-nyc
                            12 Dec 2020, 00:16

                            If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:19 last edited by
                            #75

                            @jon-nyc said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                            If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!

                            Please show your work.

                            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • L Offline
                              L Offline
                              LuFins Dad
                              wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:19 last edited by
                              #76

                              So sad. The only choice now is to buy the condo in Trump’s new development in Costa Rica where he is planning on recreating the True United States of America (tm)

                              The Brad

                              ? 1 Reply Last reply 12 Dec 2020, 00:23
                              • L LuFins Dad
                                12 Dec 2020, 00:19

                                So sad. The only choice now is to buy the condo in Trump’s new development in Costa Rica where he is planning on recreating the True United States of America (tm)

                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                A Former User
                                wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:23 last edited by
                                #77

                                One cannot debate someone who is invincibly ignorant.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:30 last edited by
                                  #78

                                  That’s why watching you and Larry go back and forth is so much fun...

                                  The Brad

                                  ? 1 Reply Last reply 12 Dec 2020, 00:32
                                  • L LuFins Dad
                                    12 Dec 2020, 00:30

                                    That’s why watching you and Larry go back and forth is so much fun...

                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    A Former User
                                    wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:32 last edited by
                                    #79

                                    @LuFins-Dad said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:

                                    That’s why watching you and Larry go back and forth is so much fun...

                                    Larry is not going to like it that you believe he is ignorant.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      LuFins Dad
                                      wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:33 last edited by
                                      #80

                                      It’s like watching two kittens foght over the laser pointer for.

                                      The Brad

                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply 12 Dec 2020, 00:38
                                      • L LuFins Dad
                                        12 Dec 2020, 00:33

                                        It’s like watching two kittens foght over the laser pointer for.

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        A Former User
                                        wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:38 last edited by
                                        #81

                                        Link to video

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 01:45 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Dec 2020, 01:46
                                          #82

                                          Somebody has some more loss to fester in.

                                          Only non-witches get due process.

                                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                          G 1 Reply Last reply 12 Dec 2020, 01:46
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes

                                          72/178

                                          12 Dec 2020, 00:05


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          72 out of 178
                                          • First post
                                            72/178
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups