Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit
-
@bachophile said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
Wrong.
Texas is asking whether an unconstitutional vote cancels out a constitutional vote. The state legislature has the authority to write a state's election rules. If those rules are changed by the Executive, as in Pennsylvania, that vioaltes the U.S. Constitution. At that point, do those votes in Pennsylvania constitute legal and valid votes?
The other issue is the Interstate Commerce Clause, which is why I asked about wheat farmers (which I don't think anybody picked up on, but that's the original SCOTUS ruling). Does the Commerce Clause have any bearing on votes from state to state in a federal election?
Those are two pretty good questions, SCOTUS may choose to hear or not. They are not silliness, as some Dem homers would have you believe.
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 20:06 last edited by@Jolly said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Texas is asking whether an unconstitutional vote cancels out a constitutional vote. The state legislature has the authority to write a state's election rules. If those rules are changed by the Executive, as in Pennsylvania, that vioaltes the U.S. Constitution.
This is the funny part. Texas’ governor also unilaterally changed the election rules set by his legislature. We even had a thread about it.
That’s why oral arguments would be so delicious.
This is frivolity. A press release masquerading as a suit. Ken needs a pardon. Though he’ll likely face state charges too.
-
What about a quiz: Let's guess how Larry will continue his "the election was stolen" BS after all court cases have been rejected. Will it be a) all the justices are braindead liberals, b) the US as a country is doomed, c) Trump actually won the court cases but the media don't report it, d) your guess, ...?
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 20:07 last edited by@Klaus said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
What about a quiz: Let's guess how Larry will continue his "the election was stolen" BS after all court cases have been rejected. Will it be a) all the justices are braindead liberals, b) the US as a country is doomed, c) Trump actually won the court cases but the media don't report it, d) your guess, ...?
- Voter fraud HAS been proven. That is a stone cold fact.
- The election WAS stolen. That too, is a stone cold fact.
So no matter what the final outcome is, two things will remain - the democrats propped up an old man with signs of dementia so they could get back to selling us out to China, and they stole the election for him. Now whether you're smart enough to finally see it I can't say.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 20:09 last edited by
You’ve been played like a fiddle, Larry.
You’re the chump.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 20:18 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
You’ve been played like a fiddle, Larry.
You’re the chump.
Lol
No, YOU have been played. I won't call you a chump, though. Because if Biden does get sworn in I'm going to rub your nose in it so hard you'll think your face is going to rip off.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 21:31 last edited by
Hurry, @Larry, at the rate of Trump keep losing his election lawsuits and the Democratic nominees getting ever closer to being sworn into office, Trump can sure use your help. There might still be time for you to help Trump by donating here: https://secure.winred.com/djt/election-defense-fund .
|| 50% of each contribution, up to a maximum of $2,800 ($5,000), to be designated toward DJTFP’s 2020 general election account for general election debt retirement until such debt is retired. 50% of each contribution, up to a maximum of $2,800 ($5,000), to be designated toward DJTFP’s Recount Account. Any amount that exceeds the applicable contribution limit for 2020 general election debt retirement, including any amounts donated to DJTFP after such debt has been retired, will be designated in full toward DJFTP’s Recount Account, up to a maximum of $2,800 ($5,000).
Donations to DJTFP’s Recount Account will be used solely in connection with any post-election recounts and election contests and not for the purpose of influencing any federal election. ||
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:17 last edited by
Ax, what do you think about Eric The Fart Swalwell getting caught with Chinese spies? Biden and his son have been under criminal investigation since 2015, for allegedly selling influence to China. Now we know that several democrats are in bed with the Chinese Communist party, selling our country out to line their own pockets, you ignore all that and the millions of dollars involved but complain about where Trumps campaign money gets spent. So it begs the question - do you hate American too, or are you just stupid? It's one or the other, there are no other options for you.
-
Ax, what do you think about Eric The Fart Swalwell getting caught with Chinese spies? Biden and his son have been under criminal investigation since 2015, for allegedly selling influence to China. Now we know that several democrats are in bed with the Chinese Communist party, selling our country out to line their own pockets, you ignore all that and the millions of dollars involved but complain about where Trumps campaign money gets spent. So it begs the question - do you hate American too, or are you just stupid? It's one or the other, there are no other options for you.
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:18 last edited by@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Biden and his son
AFAIK, Joe hasn't been under criminal investigation.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:20 last edited by
YET. He will be soon.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:25 last edited by
When it comes to testimony, I bet Joe is real good at forgetting.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:34 last edited by
SCOTUS denies for lack of standing.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:43 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Nov 2020, 23:43
7-2. All the Trump appointees voted no standing.
Even Alito and Thomas were going to provide no relief, just didn’t think the court could deny standing under “original jurisdiction” cases.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:46 last edited by
Yes, it's pretty much over. Trump tried his best to save the country, but it isn't going to happen. The democrats have stolen the election, and Biden will be sworn in to office.
The sad part of this is all those real Americans who actually voted are going to have to suffer the consequences of this coup. Everyone might as well go ahead and submit to their coming new rulers - the CCP.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 23:48 last edited by xenon 12 Nov 2020, 23:52
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
The democrats have stolen the election
Which ones? As in - Joe did it?
If you truly believe this - you believe that one of the greatest crime against the United States has just been perpetrated.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:00 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Dec 2020, 00:00
From a lawyer who is also the spouse of the former Texas Solicitor General and former Alito clerk:
From a wise friend: So, just so I understand what the Alito/Thomas blurb is about, SCOTUS is effectively saying “get the eff off my lawn” while Alito/Thomas are like “you’re welcome to ring the doorbell but no way are we opening the door to you weirdos?” EXACTLY
-
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.
JULY 30th:
Formal election predictions in regards to the following:1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions
You also missed question 6.
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:03 last edited by@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.
JULY 30th:
Formal election predictions in regards to the following:1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions
You also missed question 6.
Which part? We knew Biden won before thanksgiving, actually 19 days prior, on Nov 7th.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:05 last edited by
Even Alito and Thomas said they wouldn’t have granted relief, just that the court is required to take original jurisdiction cases.
They didn’t have to add the part about ‘we wouldn’t have granted relief’.
In that sense is was a 9-0 fuck you.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:11 last edited by
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:16 last edited by
If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!
-
If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:19 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
If you convert the letters in the Alito comment to numbers divide by 9, the number of Supremes, then turn it back into letters, shifting everything one spot, to represent the unitary executive, it spells "Look, Look, Hunter, Banana, Phone Jacob Wohl." this thing isn't over folks!
Please show your work.
-
wrote on 12 Dec 2020, 00:19 last edited by
So sad. The only choice now is to buy the condo in Trump’s new development in Costa Rica where he is planning on recreating the True United States of America (tm)
