Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 12:15 last edited by
Why does a wheat farmer in one state have an effect upon a wheat farmer in another state?
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 12:36 last edited by
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
That’s as relevant as saying Donald Trump wore more red ties than any other President. In fact, it’s worse since it implies that the popular vote would or should have anything to do with the election of Presidents of the United States.
Therefore, we find your post inaccurate and suspend your posting privileges...
-
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 14:15 last edited by@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 14:19 last edited by
Larry you know the rule that if you can’t figure out who the chump is at the table, then it’s you.
There’s another rule, less we’ll known: If you think everyone else sitting around the table are chumps, you’re actually the chump.
-
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Jon, you can try to explain this away all you want, but the fact is this is real, and it's not going to end well for you., lol
Larry, you’re being played hard. The lead lawyers are playing Trump in hopes of securing pardons and the politicians are playing folks like you. Only suckers still believe in this shit. Don’t be one of them.
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 14:28 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Jon, you can try to explain this away all you want, but the fact is this is real, and it's not going to end well for you., lol
Larry, you’re being played hard. The lead lawyers are playing Trump in hopes of securing pardons and the politicians are playing folks like you. Only suckers still believe in this shit. Don’t be one of them.
The one being played is you, Jon. You just made two statements of opinion and stated them as facts. Both of those opinions are ridiculous conspiracy theories that you either made up on your own orvare direct media quotes.
Now let me give you some facts:
- Voter fraud HAS BEEN PROVEN.
- Voting laws HAVE BEEN BROKEN.
Those two things are set in stone, Jon. Whether you want to accept that or not is your problem, not mine. Whether or not there is enough time to get the courts to act on it before the criminal Biden gets in office is the only unknown in this entire thing. But eventually it WILL all come out. Only suckers are still defending the treason Jon, don't be one of them.
-
Larry you know the rule that if you can’t figure out who the chump is at the table, then it’s you.
There’s another rule, less we’ll known: If you think everyone else sitting around the table are chumps, you’re actually the chump.
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 14:30 last edited by@jon-nyc said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Larry you know the rule that if you can’t figure out who the chump is at the table, then it’s you.
There’s another rule, less we’ll known: If you think everyone else sitting around the table are chumps, you’re actually the chump.
So you at least know how to identify a chump. All that's left is for you to realize it's you.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 14:34 last edited by
We’ll find out when Scotus rules, won’t we.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 14:36 last edited by
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 14:41 last edited by
I have a question for you, Jon...
How far does the left/democrats/media/big tech alliance have to pull this country down before you finally see the treason?
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 14:53 last edited by
I’ll stop beating my wife when I’m good and ready, goddammit.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 15:00 last edited by bachophile 12 Nov 2020, 15:01
Georgia (by way of their republican attorney general) has told Texas to fuck off
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 15:00 last edited by
I don't think you beat your wife, Jon. My question was to find out how much treason youre willing to accept.
-
Georgia (by way of their republican attorney general) has told Texas to fuck off
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 15:02 last edited by@bachophile said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Georgia (by way of their republican attorney general) have told Texas to fuck off
Too late. 18 states and over 100 Republican congressmen have joined the suit.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 15:05 last edited by
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
-
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 15:09 last edited by@bachophile said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
Unfortunately for the swing states, there has already been 2 decisions by the supreme court in the past that set precedent, and the swing states are wrong.
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 16:29 last edited by
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 16:33 last edited by
[link text](
) -
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 17:15 last edited by jon-nyc 12 Nov 2020, 17:15
This is either going to be a cert denial or a 9-0 per curium unsigned. Small chance it’s a 9-0 with Robert’s name on it.
Almost a shame it would be fun to watch that AG Texas squirm in orals.
-
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 17:21 last edited by@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
What would it take to convince you that the election result is legitimate and voter fraud did not play a significant role?
-
wrote on 11 Dec 2020, 17:43 last edited by
Non existent states are joining the amicus.
The GOP has now officially jumped the Kracken.
