CISA on voting fraud
-
US government agency in charge of election security. Reports are that the director expects to be fired over this.
“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result. “
JOINT STATEMENT FROM ELECTIONS INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNMENT COORDINATING COUNCIL & THE ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR COORDINATING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES
Original release date: November 12, 2020
WASHINGTON – The members of Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Assistant Director Bob Kolasky, U.S. Election Assistance Commission Chair Benjamin Hovland, National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) President Maggie Toulouse Oliver, National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) President Lori Augino, and Escambia County (Florida) Supervisor of Elections David Stafford – and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council (SCC) – Chair Brian Hancock (Unisyn Voting Solutions), Vice Chair Sam Derheimer (Hart InterCivic), Chris Wlaschin (Election Systems & Software), Ericka Haas (Electronic Registration Information Center), and Maria Bianchi (Democracy Works) - released the following statement:“The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
“When states have close elections, many will recount ballots. All of the states with close results in the 2020 presidential race have paper records of each vote, allowing the ability to go back and count each ballot if necessary. This is an added benefit for security and resilience. This process allows for the identification and correction of any mistakes or errors. There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.
“Other security measures like pre-election testing, state certification of voting equipment, and the U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC) certification of voting equipment help to build additional confidence in the voting systems used in 2020.
“While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections, and you should too. When you have questions, turn to elections officials as trusted voices as they administer elections.””
-
The stridency of their assertions makes me think something is really wrong. I don't doubt these are the most secure from "hacking" or foreign interference, but c'mon, the way these mail-in ballots were handled makes such assertions ridiculous.
And the existence of paper ballots that cannot be connected to an actual person tells very little about whether or not it was a valid ballot.
-
@Kincaid said in CISA on voting fraud:
The stridency of their assertions makes me think something is really wrong.
Either that or they're totally sick of Trumps bullshit. His claims have been pretty strident, too. In fact, some might say laughably so.
-
Apparently, the fact that the agency in charge of election security is saying that the election was unprecedentedly (is that a word???) secure is the evidence we've all been waiting for that the election was rigged.
-
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
-
@Copper said in CISA on voting fraud:
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
One could say the same about double checking before claiming massive fraud.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Copper said in CISA on voting fraud:
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
One could say the same about double checking before claiming massive fraud.
Philadelphia has long been noted as a hotbed, as has Chicago.
-
@Jolly said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Doctor-Phibes said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Copper said in CISA on voting fraud:
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
One could say the same about double checking before claiming massive fraud.
Philadelphia has long been noted as a hotbed, as has Chicago.
Shoulda been easy for the Prez to prove that when he complained about it 3M-5M votes 4 years ago.
He even started an integrity commission... strangely nothing came of it.
-
@Jolly said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Doctor-Phibes said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Copper said in CISA on voting fraud:
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
One could say the same about double checking before claiming massive fraud.
Philadelphia has long been noted as a hotbed, as has Chicago.
'Everybody always knew he was a wrong-un', is unlikely to get somebody convicted.
-
Perhaps some of the duplicate votes will be traced to his suggestion. Not one of his better ideas.