CISA on voting fraud
-
The stridency of their assertions makes me think something is really wrong. I don't doubt these are the most secure from "hacking" or foreign interference, but c'mon, the way these mail-in ballots were handled makes such assertions ridiculous.
And the existence of paper ballots that cannot be connected to an actual person tells very little about whether or not it was a valid ballot.
-
@Kincaid said in CISA on voting fraud:
The stridency of their assertions makes me think something is really wrong.
Either that or they're totally sick of Trumps bullshit. His claims have been pretty strident, too. In fact, some might say laughably so.
-
Apparently, the fact that the agency in charge of election security is saying that the election was unprecedentedly (is that a word???) secure is the evidence we've all been waiting for that the election was rigged.
-
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
-
@Copper said in CISA on voting fraud:
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
One could say the same about double checking before claiming massive fraud.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Copper said in CISA on voting fraud:
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
One could say the same about double checking before claiming massive fraud.
Philadelphia has long been noted as a hotbed, as has Chicago.
-
@Jolly said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Doctor-Phibes said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Copper said in CISA on voting fraud:
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
One could say the same about double checking before claiming massive fraud.
Philadelphia has long been noted as a hotbed, as has Chicago.
Shoulda been easy for the Prez to prove that when he complained about it 3M-5M votes 4 years ago.
He even started an integrity commission... strangely nothing came of it.
-
@Jolly said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Doctor-Phibes said in CISA on voting fraud:
@Copper said in CISA on voting fraud:
First he says they are double-checking - but aren't finished yet
Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result.
Then he says he has "utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections"
First, double check
Then, have the utmost confidenceCart Horse
One could say the same about double checking before claiming massive fraud.
Philadelphia has long been noted as a hotbed, as has Chicago.
'Everybody always knew he was a wrong-un', is unlikely to get somebody convicted.
-
Perhaps some of the duplicate votes will be traced to his suggestion. Not one of his better ideas.