Mic drop

[Axtremus]

@Jolly said in Mic drop:

In other words, it's fine for the media to censor an Administration official at anytime over anything?

Yes, the First Amendment guarantees the media’s rights to do so.

If you don’t like a particular medium, use a different medium or start your own.

[Larry]

@Axtremus said in Mic drop:

@Jolly said in Mic drop:

In other words, it's fine for the media to censor an Administration official at anytime over anything?

Yes, the First Amendment guarantees the media’s rights to do so.

If you don’t like a particular medium, use a different medium or start your own.

Likewise, if you don't like what this nation was built on, get out and go live somewhere else.

[89th]

@Jolly said in Mic drop:

In other words, it's fine for the media to censor an Administration official at anytime over anything?

Yes, although I wouldn't use the word censor, which would generally be the other way around (gov censoring media), and doesn't apply here since Fox isn't preventing other outlets from carrying the coverage.

And reckless and dangerous? A call for a fair election is reckless and dangerous?

Yes, claiming there is fraud and illegal voting, without evidence, is reckless and dangerous, especially when it's coming from the President's office.

[Doctor Phibes]

@89th said in Mic drop:

Yes, claiming there is fraud and illegal voting, without evidence, is reckless and dangerous, especially when it's coming from the President's office.

You mis-spelt orifice.

[Copper]

@89th said in Mic drop:

@Jolly said in Mic drop:

In other words, it's fine for the media to censor an Administration official at anytime over anything?

Yes, although I wouldn't use the word censor, which would generally be the other way around (gov censoring media), and doesn't apply here since Fox isn't preventing other outlets from carrying the coverage.

And reckless and dangerous? A call for a fair election is reckless and dangerous?

Yes, claiming there is fraud and illegal voting, without evidence, is reckless and dangerous, especially when it's coming from the President's office.

CNN has done an amazing job getting people to repeat “without evidence”

They really have, a very effective strategy

[Larry]

@89th said in Mic drop:

@Jolly said in Mic drop:

In other words, it's fine for the media to censor an Administration official at anytime over anything?

Yes, although I wouldn't use the word censor, which would generally be the other way around (gov censoring media), and doesn't apply here since Fox isn't preventing other outlets from carrying the coverage.

And reckless and dangerous? A call for a fair election is reckless and dangerous?

Yes, claiming there is fraud and illegal voting, without evidence, is reckless and dangerous, especially when it's coming from the President's office.

Where did you get the silly notion there is no evidence?

[George K]

@Copper said in Mic drop:

CNN has done an amazing job getting people to repeat “without evidence”

RUSSIA!!!

[Jolly]

@George-K said in Mic drop:

@Copper said in Mic drop:

CNN has done an amazing job getting people to repeat “without evidence”

RUSSIA!!!

Russia! Russia! Russia!

See, it just rolls on the tongue, like the windy waves lapping the banks of Jordan.