Trump lawsuits
-
The Michigan dead voters myth has already been debunked yesteday.
Please if you want to spread conspiracy ideas, at least spread more up to date ones that haven’t yet been dumped down the toilet.
-
-
@Larry said in Trump lawsuits:
Ok, the deal with the software issue. Several counties in georgia have joined the growing list of counties reporting problems with the software switching Trump votes to Biden votes. By the thousands...
So if the courts determine this is all nonsense will you accept the election?
-
"My pronouns are FA/FO." - Mik, 2024
-
-
@Larry the Georgia glitch was reported and dealt with five days ago. They put out a statement last week. Didn’t affect the count
"In an effort to expedite the complete count of the remaining Gwinnett County General and Special Election votes, the County, with assistance from Dominion Voting Systems technicians, will revisit the batches of absentee by mail ballots that were added to the Election Night totals without being fully adjudicated. Once these ballots have been fully adjudicated, the absentee by mail totals will be updated, and together with the remaining uncounted votes, the results will be tallied and published. Additional uncounted votes include approximately 4,400 absentee ballots received on Election Day, votes to be rescanned from one corrupted data card from the Shorty Howell advance in-person voting site, and any of the approximately 1,000 provisional ballots that can be counted. The adjudication process is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. on Thursday, November 5, and is estimated to take about three days to complete."
-
I'll use the old one. . . :
We can put a man on the moon, but we can't figure out a means for accurate voting, from dead people to computer glitches, to people that are able to use nefarious means to swing an election.
Why not? Too complicated, can't validate vote or voter, people blocked from seeing how votes are counted, etc.
Nah.
The answer is "they" don't really want an accurate, foolproof system. That includes left and right, but now of course the focus is on the Left.
All Americans want an accurate, fair system.
But it's impossible, you see. Such a process and system would not allow, um, flexibility.
-
It's very simple.
-
NO mail-in ballots, except for deployed military personnel and government employees on official business. Vote form must be thumb-printed and witnessed.
-
All voting done in person. Vote by thumbprint or retinal scan. ID checked against voter role database. Any allowed early voting shall be in person and adhere to all regulations for normal voting. Systems will not be connected to the internet.
-
Registration must be a minimum of thirty days before the election date.
-
A full audit trail will be maintained at all times, with poll observers able to observe all counting procedures.
-
-
Jolly always has good solutions.
Too bad he has no power to implement them.
But, sounds good, if only to imagine that congress tried to implement even one of Jolly's solutions.
I guess there's that swamp thing always in the way, and big money, and power and ambition. Did I mention big money? I think so, because if Big Money was not involved, Jolly's solutions would resonate because Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.
-
@Rainman said in Trump lawsuits:
Jolly always has good solutions.
@Jolly's proposed solutions are un-Constitutional and un-American.
Losing one election and already @Jolly wants to repeal the First Amendment and foist Big Government on social media. -
@Axtremus said in Trump lawsuits:
@Rainman said in Trump lawsuits:
Jolly always has good solutions.
@Jolly's proposed solutions are un-Constitutional and un-American.
Losing one election and already @Jolly wants to repeal the First Amendment and foist Big Government on social media.Would somebody tell this porn-loving, beer-swilling, sorry-ass excuse for a piano player, about my positions on voting, that have remained constant for over twenty years?
-
Current status of President Trump lawsuits (per NPR)
Pennsylvania: Extended deadlines, observers
Philadelphia may be the central location in President Trump's quest to prove the 2020 election was stolen from him.
As expected, Republican voters voted more heavily on Election Day in Pennsylvania, a critical swing state, and Democrats voted in significantly larger numbers by mail.
Because laws around the vote counting process did not adjust to that reality, it took days before it was clear that former Vice President Joe Biden had won the state.
The Trump campaign and many Republicans, however, have seized on the time it has taken for officials to count ballots as a sign of something fraudulent happening. But the lawsuits they have filed have not borne that narrative out.
Thus far, the campaign has scored a few wins in court but none that will have an effect on the result of the state. A state court, and separately the U.S. Supreme Court, ruled that local officials must segregate some ballots in case deadlines that were extended by the secretary of state are found to be unconstitutional.
It's unclear how many ballots that will be at this point, but experts are extremely skeptical it will be anywhere close to enough to overturn Biden's current 45,000-vote lead in the state.
Separately, a federal judge ruled that election observers could stand slightly closer to election officials than they were previously allowed to, but a request to stop vote counting over the issue was dismissed.
Michigan: Unfounded claims of lack of transparency
Similarly, in Michigan the Trump campaign has tried to allude to improprieties in a major city in a state it won in 2016, but lost this year. In Michigan's case: Detroit.
The campaign's claims have focused on an alleged lack of transparency in the vote-counting process, but in two cases, judges have not been swayed.
"This court finds that while there are assertions made by the plaintiffs that there is no evidence in support of those assertions," said Judge Timothy Kenny in denying a request to delay certification of election results.
"On this factual record, I have no basis to find that there's a substantial likelihood of success on the merits as relates to this defendant, nor am I convinced that there is a clear legal duty on behalf of anyone who is properly before this court to manage this issue," said Judge Cynthia Stephens in denying a separate request to stop the state's vote counting.
Still, the Trump campaign says it has more evidence to come regarding the elections process in Detroit. Two voters filed suit against the City of Detroit and its elections commission, alleging a number of crimes on the part of election officials. The suit includes an affidavit from an elections employee who makes a number of claims that have been disputed by city officials.
"We have only begun the process of obtaining an accurate and honest vote count," said White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany at a press conference Monday afternoon.
Arizona: Baseless Sharpie conspiracies
A rumor, which has been debunked by the Department of Homeland Security, still led to a lawsuit by the Trump campaign in Arizona.
The campaign alleged that some voters had their ballots incorrectly rejected because they used Sharpies to fill them out. It's a claim that went viral on social media, despite officials insisting it was not true.
"Don't promote disinfo! Stop spreading #SharpieGate claims," said Chris Krebs, the director of the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
The agency debunked the claim on its Rumor Control website, which fact-checks election misinformation.
Republicans in the state dropped the Sharpie lawsuit Saturday but then filed a separate suit alleging other votes in the state were incorrectly rejected.
Georgia: No evidence of late ballots counted
A Georgia judge summarily dismissed a Trump campaign lawsuit last week that alleged ballots received after a 7 p.m. Election Day deadline were mixed in with legitimate ballots, according to The Current, a nonprofit newsroom in Georgia that partners with NPR member station Georgia Public Broadcasting.
Republicans in the state based their allegations on testimony from a Georgia GOP poll watcher who was subsequently unable to provide any evidence.
"The court finds that there is no evidence that the ballots referenced in the petition were received after 7:00 p.m. on [Election Day], thereby making those ballots invalid," Judge James F. Bass wrote, in dismissing the case.
On Monday, Georgia's two sitting Republican senators called for the state's Republican secretary of state Brad Raffensperger to resign after alleging "too many failures in Georgia elections this year" but without mentioning specifics to support their claims, as reported by GPB's Stephen Fowler.
Raffensperger shot back.
"My job is to follow Georgia law and see to it that all legal votes, and no illegal votes, are counted properly and accurately," he said. "As secretary of state, that is my duty, and I will continue to do my duty. As a Republican, I am concerned about Republicans keeping the U.S. Senate. I recommend that Sens. Loeffler and Perdue start focusing on that."
Nevada: Rejected requests to stop machine verification, processing of mail ballots
In Nevada, another state Biden seems to have won by a fairly thin margin, Nevada Republicans filed a lawsuit that, had it been successful, would have slowed down the vote-counting process.
The Trump campaign and the Nevada Republican Party claimed that "irregularities have plagued the election" in Clark County, the state's most populous county, without providing evidence. They argued that the county should not be able to use a machine to verify signatures, but federal Judge Andrew Gordon rejected the request.
The Trump campaign also earlier sued unsuccessfully to stop the processing of mail ballots in Clark County.
-
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
@Jolly said in Trump lawsuits:
NPR is a biased news source.
What is incorrect about what was written?
-
@taiwan_girl it contradicts Trump
