Better election map
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 20:13 last edited by
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 20:18 last edited by
Oh, that's nice.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 20:21 last edited by
Yeah, it is. A similar map could have been constructed in 2016. I was always interested that people think there's a huge impact, in terms of the people they see around them every day, based on who gets elected president. It's a thing that exists in certain minds, and it is meaningful to them.
-
Yeah, it is. A similar map could have been constructed in 2016. I was always interested that people think there's a huge impact, in terms of the people they see around them every day, based on who gets elected president. It's a thing that exists in certain minds, and it is meaningful to them.
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 21:40 last edited by@Horace said in Better election map:
Yeah, it is. A similar map could have been constructed in 2016. I was always interested that people think there's a huge impact, in terms of the people they see around them every day, based on who gets elected president. It's a thing that exists in certain minds, and it is meaningful to them.
Mobs (and the degree to which they feel emboldened) lead to a much greater impact on the day to day.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 21:45 last edited by
Yep.
-
Yeah, it is. A similar map could have been constructed in 2016. I was always interested that people think there's a huge impact, in terms of the people they see around them every day, based on who gets elected president. It's a thing that exists in certain minds, and it is meaningful to them.
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 21:58 last edited by@Horace said in Better election map:
A similar map could have been constructed in 2016
That would have made a lot of people unhappy.
-
wrote on 7 Nov 2020, 23:37 last edited by
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly. I want to KNOW where the enemies of the State are.
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 00:36 last edited by
@89th Good map. Puts things in perspective.
-
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly. I want to KNOW where the enemies of the State are.
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 00:48 last edited by@Larry said in Better election map:
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly.
There is not a state, not even a district, that supports Marxists.
-
@Larry said in Better election map:
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly.
There is not a state, not even a district, that supports Marxists.
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 02:33 last edited by@Axtremus said in Better election map:
@Larry said in Better election map:
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly.
There is not a state, not even a district, that supports Marxists.
You rang?
-
@Axtremus said in Better election map:
@Larry said in Better election map:
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly.
There is not a state, not even a district, that supports Marxists.
You rang?
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 02:37 last edited by -
@Larry said in Better election map:
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly.
There is not a state, not even a district, that supports Marxists.
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 03:19 last edited by@Axtremus said in Better election map:
@Larry said in Better election map:
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly.
There is not a state, not even a district, that supports Marxists.
There is an entire party that does, you fucking fool.
-
@Axtremus said in Better election map:
@Larry said in Better election map:
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly.
There is not a state, not even a district, that supports Marxists.
There is an entire party that does, you fucking fool.
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 12:24 last edited by@Larry said in Better election map:
@Axtremus said in Better election map:
@Larry said in Better election map:
I don't want a more "polite" map. Identify which states support the Marxists, and do it clearly.
There is not a state, not even a district, that supports Marxists.
There is an entire party that does, ...
Sure there is, no one claims otherwise; see, for example, the Communist Party USA.
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 14:26 last edited by
It's the democrat party, ass wipe.
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 15:53 last edited by
@Larry said in Better election map:
It's the democrat party ...
Please be informed that the Democratic Party and the Democrats generally do not support Marxists.
Here, you might enjoy studying this article that lays out the arguments for why Trump may be a Marxist. Once that's established, you will finally find a major American political party, the GOP, that supports a Marxist. Have fun!
-
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 20:16 last edited by
And Larry loses by default once again. Yelling and insults never win a civilised debate. Shame that now Rudy G has joined Farage up Trumps arse there's no room for Larry, he'd fit in perfectly
-
@Larry said in Better election map:
It's the democrat party ...
Please be informed that the Democratic Party and the Democrats generally do not support Marxists.
Here, you might enjoy studying this article that lays out the arguments for why Trump may be a Marxist. Once that's established, you will finally find a major American political party, the GOP, that supports a Marxist. Have fun!
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 20:34 last edited by@Axtremus said in Better election map:
@Larry said in Better election map:
It's the democrat party ...
Please be informed that the Democratic Party and the Democrats generally do not support Marxists.
Here, you might enjoy studying this article that lays out the arguments for why Trump may be a Marxist. Once that's established, you will finally find a major American political party, the GOP, that supports a Marxist. Have fun!
The democrats ARE Marxists. You being stupid doesn't mean I have to go crazy with you.
-
And Larry loses by default once again. Yelling and insults never win a civilised debate. Shame that now Rudy G has joined Farage up Trumps arse there's no room for Larry, he'd fit in perfectly
wrote on 8 Nov 2020, 20:36 last edited by@AndyD said in Better election map:
And Larry loses by default once again. Yelling and insults never win a civilised debate. Shame that now Rudy G has joined Farage up Trumps arse there's no room for Larry, he'd fit in perfectly
I only hurl insults at idiots and fools. So fuck you you little pussy man. None of this is any of your business anyway.