Foundation
-
Premiers September 24
Link to video -
Oh flipping heck, it's on Apple TV, what a PITA. I really can't justify another subscription.
-
Oh flipping heck, it's on Apple TV, what a PITA. I really can't justify another subscription.
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
Oh flipping heck, it's on Apple TV, what a PITA. I really can't justify another subscription.
I think you can get a free 6-month trial.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
Oh flipping heck, it's on Apple TV, what a PITA. I really can't justify another subscription.
I think you can get a free 6-month trial.
@george-k said in Foundation:
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
Oh flipping heck, it's on Apple TV, what a PITA. I really can't justify another subscription.
I think you can get a free 6-month trial.
I'll need to time that carefully
-
@george-k said in Foundation:
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
Oh flipping heck, it's on Apple TV, what a PITA. I really can't justify another subscription.
I think you can get a free 6-month trial.
I'll need to time that carefully
@doctor-phibes I was wrong.
It's only 7 day free trial. But if you
get a Macpurchase a qualifying Apple device, you get one year - free. -
September 24th.
Link to video -
I re-read it about 5 years ago.
This makes me want to revisit.
The interesting question is this: Should I read in order of publication, or in order of the story?
Having read through Alastair Reynolds' "Revelation Space" universe this summer in order of story, I think that might be a better option.
Chronological: Prelude to Foundation (1988)
Forward the Foundation (1993)
Foundation (1951)
Foundation and Empire (1952)
Second Foundation (1953)
Foundation's Edge (1982)
Foundation and Earth (1986) -
I re-read it about 5 years ago.
This makes me want to revisit.
The interesting question is this: Should I read in order of publication, or in order of the story?
Having read through Alastair Reynolds' "Revelation Space" universe this summer in order of story, I think that might be a better option.
Chronological: Prelude to Foundation (1988)
Forward the Foundation (1993)
Foundation (1951)
Foundation and Empire (1952)
Second Foundation (1953)
Foundation's Edge (1982)
Foundation and Earth (1986)@george-k said in Foundation:
The interesting question is this: Should I read in order of publication, or in order of the story?
I would always read in order of publication. There's a few gotcha's in there - particularly the tie-in with R. Daneel from the robot stories, which clearly Asimov hadn't thought about when he started the books.
-
@george-k said in Foundation:
The interesting question is this: Should I read in order of publication, or in order of the story?
I would always read in order of publication. There's a few gotcha's in there - particularly the tie-in with R. Daneel from the robot stories, which clearly Asimov hadn't thought about when he started the books.
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
I would always read in order of publication.
Yeah, I get it.
Speaking from my "Revelation Space" experience, however, I'd disagree. There are SO many ideas that are talked about in the first-published books that make no sense, other than in a vague deus ex machina sense.
Reading them in chronological order was a better experience for me. -
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
I would always read in order of publication.
Yeah, I get it.
Speaking from my "Revelation Space" experience, however, I'd disagree. There are SO many ideas that are talked about in the first-published books that make no sense, other than in a vague deus ex machina sense.
Reading them in chronological order was a better experience for me.@george-k said in Foundation:
Speaking from my "Revelation Space" experience, however, I'd disagree. There are SO many ideas that are talked about in the first-published books that make no sense, other than in a vague deus ex machina sense.
Reading them in chronological order was a better experience for me.Alastair Reynolds isn't Isaac Asimov. I suspect he put a lot more planning into the series. Foundation was supposed to be a trilogy, not the ever expanding series it became.
-
@george-k said in Foundation:
Speaking from my "Revelation Space" experience, however, I'd disagree. There are SO many ideas that are talked about in the first-published books that make no sense, other than in a vague deus ex machina sense.
Reading them in chronological order was a better experience for me.Alastair Reynolds isn't Isaac Asimov. I suspect he put a lot more planning into the series. Foundation was supposed to be a trilogy, not the ever expanding series it became.
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
Alastair Reynolds isn't Isaac Asimov.
Indeed. Very different.
But I love Reynolds.
Have you read his stuff?
-
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
Alastair Reynolds isn't Isaac Asimov.
Indeed. Very different.
But I love Reynolds.
Have you read his stuff?
@george-k said in Foundation:
@doctor-phibes said in Foundation:
Alastair Reynolds isn't Isaac Asimov.
Indeed. Very different.
But I love Reynolds.
Have you read his stuff?
No, but he's on my to-do list. I'm working my way through the Expanse series at the moment, rather slowly I'm afraid.
-
@george-k said in Foundation:
First two episodes aired last night. Has anyone watched?
Watching tonight.
-
Thoughts?
I'm finding it, though engaging, "different." High production values, beautifully filmed.
But...
It just doesn't FEEL like Asimov's book(s). The series takes the concept of psychohistory and uses that as a springboard to tell a somewhat related story.