Tonight On Tucker
-
I watched most of the hour.
He left it to the imagination what crime might have been committed.
But he made it clear that Joe Biden was personally involved with the Chinese and the deal.
So what?
So the Bidens are denying it. They are going out of their way to sell the lie.
Something happened that they want quiet.
What? I'm not sure.
-
I watched it all, too.
I liked the Babalu guy, he came across as honest, willing to make a lot of money until he saw how the plot thickened, then getting out (or forced out) and finally trying to protect his family name and generations of his patriotic family that served in the military.
Believable? Yes.
Will this go anywhere, even if it should? Of course not. Put it on the bookshelf right next to Hillary's foundation. Plausible Deniability. -
@Jolly said in Tonight On Tucker:
All Bobulinski, all hour.
https://www.newsweek.com/tony-bobulinskis-tucker-carlson-qanon-conspiracys-leader-1542767
Some QAnon believers think they have found Q!
-
Conservative media won’t really pick up on it. Only the N.Y. Post will touch it. There just isn’t enough there there in terms of a crime and no one can say what was put on that PC by nefarious parties.
Giuliani has gone off the rails. The initial flow of info was already out there and the new stuff has not verified provenance and there was no October Surprise in the last couple of days. Its like this is all they got.
The shopping of the story and evidence was a keystone cops rollout. Poor execution.
-
@Loki said in Tonight On Tucker:
Conservative media won’t really pick up on it. Only the N.Y. Post will touch it. There just isn’t enough there there in terms of a crime and no one can say what was put on that PC by nefarious parties.
Giuliani has gone off the rails. The initial flow of info was already out there and the new stuff has not verified provenance and there was no October Surprise in the last couple of days. Its like this is all they got.
The shopping of the story and evidence was a keystone cops rollout. Poor execution.
There's plenty of there, there. It is most certainly influence peddling. The only question is whether it was illegal...
How it was rolled out, makes little difference.
-
@Loki said in Tonight On Tucker:
Conservative media won’t really pick up on it. Only the N.Y. Post will touch it. There just isn’t enough there there in terms of a crime and no one can say what was put on that PC by nefarious parties.
Giuliani has gone off the rails. The initial flow of info was already out there and the new stuff has not verified provenance and there was no October Surprise in the last couple of days. Its like this is all they got.
The shopping of the story and evidence was a keystone cops rollout. Poor execution.
Another thing...It's been all over NRO, FOX, OAN, Newsmax, The Blaze, The Washington Examiner and the NY Post.
-
"Donald Trump Jr. has been revealed as the CEO of a company connected to Russia. Emails and text messages from an associate claim to be proof of the connection between Donald Jr. and his father, the President of the United States. In those messages and emails, Trump Sr. is referred as "the big guy," in the business dealings. These deals are worth tens of millions of dollars. Trump Jr., with nothing to trade on other than his father's name has had numerous contacts with heads of Russian-based interests. The Trump administration denies these claims, saying that they are 'Russian disinformation.'"
How long do you think that would play on CNN?
My guess: Months.
-
-
-
@Larry said in Tonight On Tucker:
A Senate panel investigating this matter has confirmed that everything the: guy told Tucker is true.
It must take a special kind of naïveté to believe that the Senate can work that fast.
You fit the description of the populace that, to quote Mik, “do not understand what they are voting for on even a rudimentary level.”
-
@Axtremus said in Tonight On Tucker:
It must take a special kind of naïveté to believe that the Senate can work that fast.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has been successful in verifying all materials reviewed so far from Hunter Biden’s ex-business partner Tony Bobulinski, the Daily Caller has learned.
Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson will not call Bobulinski to testify before the November 3 elections, as the committee is working to review all the information provided to the committee by Bobulinski. The information has to be verified, as it is subject to the same false information to Congress laws that verbal or written testimony does. However, a Johnson spokesperson told the Caller that all the material provided by Bobulinski that has been reviewed so far has turned out to be legitimate. The committee has “also” not come across any “signs” or evidence to suggest the content is false, the spokesperson added.
The important words are "to date."
We also don't know what materials were reviewed.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@George-K said in Tonight On Tucker:
@Axtremus said in Tonight On Tucker:
It must take a special kind of naïveté to believe that the Senate can work that fast.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has been successful in verifying all materials reviewed so far from Hunter Biden’s ex-business partner Tony Bobulinski, the Daily Caller has learned.
Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson will not call Bobulinski to testify before the November 3 elections, as the committee is working to review all the information provided to the committee by Bobulinski. The information has to be verified, as it is subject to the same false information to Congress laws that verbal or written testimony does. However, a Johnson spokesperson told the Caller that all the material provided by Bobulinski that has been reviewed so far has turned out to be legitimate. The committee has “also” not come across any “signs” or evidence to suggest the content is false, the spokesperson added.
The important words are "to date."
We also don't know what materials were reviewed.
Much less whether the reviewed material corroborates what Bobulinski told Tucker as Larry claimed.
