Tonight On Tucker
-
wrote on 27 Oct 2020, 21:46 last edited by
All Bobulinski, all hour.
-
wrote on 27 Oct 2020, 23:22 last edited by
Perfect example of MSM covering a story.
With a pillow.
-
wrote on 27 Oct 2020, 23:52 last edited by
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 01:11 last edited by
Remember Avenatti?
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 01:33 last edited by
I watched most of the hour.
He left it to the imagination what crime might have been committed.
But he made it clear that Joe Biden was personally involved with the Chinese and the deal.
So what?
So the Bidens are denying it. They are going out of their way to sell the lie.
Something happened that they want quiet.
What? I'm not sure.
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 01:54 last edited by
I watched it all, too.
I liked the Babalu guy, he came across as honest, willing to make a lot of money until he saw how the plot thickened, then getting out (or forced out) and finally trying to protect his family name and generations of his patriotic family that served in the military.
Believable? Yes.
Will this go anywhere, even if it should? Of course not. Put it on the bookshelf right next to Hillary's foundation. Plausible Deniability. -
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 15:10 last edited by
cnn appears to have zero coverage - nothing
Shocking
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 15:14 last edited by
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 15:56 last edited by
I just googled around a little
I couldn't find a word anywhere on msm about this.
A very few words 5 or 6 days ago when it was first mentioned.
There are a few mentions in the smaller markets
That fact alone should get Mr. Trump elected
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 17:27 last edited by
Voter Suppression?
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 19:08 last edited by
@Jolly said in Tonight On Tucker:
All Bobulinski, all hour.
https://www.newsweek.com/tony-bobulinskis-tucker-carlson-qanon-conspiracys-leader-1542767
Some QAnon believers think they have found Q!
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 19:58 last edited by
Conservative media won’t really pick up on it. Only the N.Y. Post will touch it. There just isn’t enough there there in terms of a crime and no one can say what was put on that PC by nefarious parties.
Giuliani has gone off the rails. The initial flow of info was already out there and the new stuff has not verified provenance and there was no October Surprise in the last couple of days. Its like this is all they got.
The shopping of the story and evidence was a keystone cops rollout. Poor execution.
-
Conservative media won’t really pick up on it. Only the N.Y. Post will touch it. There just isn’t enough there there in terms of a crime and no one can say what was put on that PC by nefarious parties.
Giuliani has gone off the rails. The initial flow of info was already out there and the new stuff has not verified provenance and there was no October Surprise in the last couple of days. Its like this is all they got.
The shopping of the story and evidence was a keystone cops rollout. Poor execution.
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 20:05 last edited by@Loki said in Tonight On Tucker:
Conservative media won’t really pick up on it. Only the N.Y. Post will touch it. There just isn’t enough there there in terms of a crime and no one can say what was put on that PC by nefarious parties.
Giuliani has gone off the rails. The initial flow of info was already out there and the new stuff has not verified provenance and there was no October Surprise in the last couple of days. Its like this is all they got.
The shopping of the story and evidence was a keystone cops rollout. Poor execution.
There's plenty of there, there. It is most certainly influence peddling. The only question is whether it was illegal...
How it was rolled out, makes little difference.
-
Conservative media won’t really pick up on it. Only the N.Y. Post will touch it. There just isn’t enough there there in terms of a crime and no one can say what was put on that PC by nefarious parties.
Giuliani has gone off the rails. The initial flow of info was already out there and the new stuff has not verified provenance and there was no October Surprise in the last couple of days. Its like this is all they got.
The shopping of the story and evidence was a keystone cops rollout. Poor execution.
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 20:07 last edited by@Loki said in Tonight On Tucker:
Conservative media won’t really pick up on it. Only the N.Y. Post will touch it. There just isn’t enough there there in terms of a crime and no one can say what was put on that PC by nefarious parties.
Giuliani has gone off the rails. The initial flow of info was already out there and the new stuff has not verified provenance and there was no October Surprise in the last couple of days. Its like this is all they got.
The shopping of the story and evidence was a keystone cops rollout. Poor execution.
Another thing...It's been all over NRO, FOX, OAN, Newsmax, The Blaze, The Washington Examiner and the NY Post.
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 21:07 last edited by
"Donald Trump Jr. has been revealed as the CEO of a company connected to Russia. Emails and text messages from an associate claim to be proof of the connection between Donald Jr. and his father, the President of the United States. In those messages and emails, Trump Sr. is referred as "the big guy," in the business dealings. These deals are worth tens of millions of dollars. Trump Jr., with nothing to trade on other than his father's name has had numerous contacts with heads of Russian-based interests. The Trump administration denies these claims, saying that they are 'Russian disinformation.'"
How long do you think that would play on CNN?
My guess: Months.
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 21:30 last edited by
racist h8r
-
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 21:57 last edited by
When the WSJ and Ted Cruz won’t bite you have to believe this is not just a MSM muzzle. I’m the last person to defend the MSM.
-
When the WSJ and Ted Cruz won’t bite you have to believe this is not just a MSM muzzle. I’m the last person to defend the MSM.
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 22:31 last edited byTed is going to retire someday too.
-
When the WSJ and Ted Cruz won’t bite you have to believe this is not just a MSM muzzle. I’m the last person to defend the MSM.
wrote on 28 Oct 2020, 23:40 last edited by@Loki said in Tonight On Tucker:
When the WSJ and Ted Cruz won’t bite you have to believe this is not just a MSM muzzle. I’m the last person to defend the MSM.
Hasn't it already made the opinion page on the WSJ?
-
wrote on 29 Oct 2020, 00:32 last edited by Larry
A Senate panel investigating this matter has confirmed that everything the: guy told Tucker is true.
