Remember?
-
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
-
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.
-
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.
And you're so full of shit your eyes are brown.
Bush nor Mittens would have ever nominated Barrett.
-
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.
And you're so full of shit your eyes are brown.
Bush nor Mittens would have ever nominated Barrett.
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.
And you're so full of shit your eyes are brown.
Bush nor Mittens would have ever nominated Barrett.
So you think she's going to be a conservative policy activist judge or an originalist?
If she's an originalist - what's so radically novel about her?
But you're right , my eyes are brown.
-
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.
And you're so full of shit your eyes are brown.
Bush nor Mittens would have ever nominated Barrett.
So you think she's going to be a conservative policy activist judge or an originalist?
If she's an originalist - what's so radically novel about her?
But you're right , my eyes are brown.
And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.
There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.
The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...
Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.
And you're so full of shit your eyes are brown.
Bush nor Mittens would have ever nominated Barrett.
So you think she's going to be a conservative policy activist judge or an originalist?
If she's an originalist - what's so radically novel about her?
But you're right , my eyes are brown.
I think she will be very similar to Scalia. That is anathema to the Dems. So much so, they are actually talking about packing the court.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login