Remember?

[Jolly]

https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/04/national-review-fires-john-derbyshire-119887

[Mik]

Uh huh.

[Jolly]

And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.

There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.

The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...

[xenon]

@Jolly said in Remember?:

And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.

There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.

The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...

Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.

[Jolly]

@xenon said in Remember?:

@Jolly said in Remember?:

And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.

There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.

The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...

Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.

And you're so full of shit your eyes are brown.

Bush nor Mittens would have ever nominated Barrett.

[xenon]

@Jolly said in Remember?:

@xenon said in Remember?:

@Jolly said in Remember?:

And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.

There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.

The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...

Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.

And you're so full of shit your eyes are brown.

Bush nor Mittens would have ever nominated Barrett.

So you think she's going to be a conservative policy activist judge or an originalist?

If she's an originalist - what's so radically novel about her?

But you're right , my eyes are brown.

[Jolly]

@xenon said in Remember?:

@Jolly said in Remember?:

@xenon said in Remember?:

@Jolly said in Remember?:

And at that point, I think Lowry started tanking National Review down a rabbit hole.

There is a reason I say that...Lowry and crew have established a defense fund for Barrett today, to fight lies and innuendo in the media. OTOH, Lowry is most definitely a Never-Trumper.

The irony is with no Trump, there is no Barrett...

Without a GOP president there is no Barrett. It didn’t have to be Trump.

And you're so full of shit your eyes are brown.

Bush nor Mittens would have ever nominated Barrett.

So you think she's going to be a conservative policy activist judge or an originalist?

If she's an originalist - what's so radically novel about her?

But you're right , my eyes are brown.

I think she will be very similar to Scalia. That is anathema to the Dems. So much so, they are actually talking about packing the court.