Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. SCOTUS hears Birthright Citizenship Case

SCOTUS hears Birthright Citizenship Case

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
10 Posts 6 Posters 69 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    And POTUS wants to participate, apparently? Maybe live-hate-tweet the event?

    Is he even allowed to have a phone in there?

    At any rate never a dull moment.

    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • kluursK Offline
      kluursK Offline
      kluurs
      wrote last edited by kluurs
      #2

      Stay tuned for the next executive order: Supreme Court justices serve for at the pleasure of the President. I'm also wondering since it was previously ruled that he can do pretty much anything as long as it is "official". "Shame if something happened to that 'lifetime appointment' - since you know, like if that lifetime was shortened...."

      1 Reply Last reply
      • RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        He attended just to give all the judges the evil eye.

        Just another day in performative politics.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          There really could not be much of any other reason for it. Too late. You appointed them for life.

          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

          1 Reply Last reply
          • kluursK Offline
            kluursK Offline
            kluurs
            wrote last edited by kluurs
            #5

            A good case can be made for the elimination/modification of birthright citizenship; however, the Constitution clearly does not permit it. The framers made it possible to amend the Constitution - and this would one of those places where that might make sense. Explained to the public, I think a majority of people of both parties would support it, but that's not where we are these days. If Trump is supporting it, then it must be opposed. Same would be true if Kamala had proposed it, not going to happen.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote last edited by Mik
              #6

              I agree. There's a case for it, but not by decree. Don't want to do the work? You don't want the change bad enough.

              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                I wouldn’t support changing it. I am uncomfortable with the idea of people being born stateless because of something their parents did.

                Especiallly in the shadow of an administration that talks about deporting 100MM people which gets you pretty deep into the citizenship rolls.

                Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • taiwan_girlT Online
                  taiwan_girlT Online
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  Only about 25% of world countries allow birthright citizen ship.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    The new world broadly does and the old world broadly doesn’t. We always considered America special for not being based on any blood-and-soil concept.

                    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                    Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                      The new world broadly does and the old world broadly doesn’t. We always considered America special for not being based on any blood-and-soil concept.

                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor PhibesD Online
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @jon-nyc said:

                      The new world broadly does and the old world broadly doesn’t. We always considered America special for not being based on any blood-and-soil concept.

                      My daughter was born here and got it automatically. What we didn't know until recently is that she is also automatically both a British and Canadian citizen due to our status as dual-national Canadian/Brits - so she's a threefer.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups