Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. SCOTUS hears Birthright Citizenship Case

SCOTUS hears Birthright Citizenship Case

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
11 Posts 6 Posters 85 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • kluursK Offline
    kluursK Offline
    kluurs
    wrote last edited by kluurs
    #2

    Stay tuned for the next executive order: Supreme Court justices serve for at the pleasure of the President. I'm also wondering since it was previously ruled that he can do pretty much anything as long as it is "official". "Shame if something happened to that 'lifetime appointment' - since you know, like if that lifetime was shortened...."

    1 Reply Last reply
    • RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      He attended just to give all the judges the evil eye.

      Just another day in performative politics.

      Elbows up!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Offline
        MikM Offline
        Mik
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        There really could not be much of any other reason for it. Too late. You appointed them for life.

        "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

        1 Reply Last reply
        • kluursK Offline
          kluursK Offline
          kluurs
          wrote last edited by kluurs
          #5

          A good case can be made for the elimination/modification of birthright citizenship; however, the Constitution clearly does not permit it. The framers made it possible to amend the Constitution - and this would one of those places where that might make sense. Explained to the public, I think a majority of people of both parties would support it, but that's not where we are these days. If Trump is supporting it, then it must be opposed. Same would be true if Kamala had proposed it, not going to happen.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Offline
            MikM Offline
            Mik
            wrote last edited by Mik
            #6

            I agree. There's a case for it, but not by decree. Don't want to do the work? You don't want the change bad enough.

            "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              I wouldn’t support changing it. I am uncomfortable with the idea of people being born stateless because of something their parents did.

              Especiallly in the shadow of an administration that talks about deporting 100MM people which gets you pretty deep into the citizenship rolls.

              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                Only about 25% of world countries allow birthright citizen ship.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  The new world broadly does and the old world broadly doesn’t. We always considered America special for not being based on any blood-and-soil concept.

                  Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                  Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    The new world broadly does and the old world broadly doesn’t. We always considered America special for not being based on any blood-and-soil concept.

                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                    Doctor PhibesD Offline
                    Doctor Phibes
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @jon-nyc said:

                    The new world broadly does and the old world broadly doesn’t. We always considered America special for not being based on any blood-and-soil concept.

                    My daughter was born here and got it automatically. What we didn't know until recently is that she is also automatically both a British and Canadian citizen due to our status as dual-national Canadian/Brits - so she's a threefer.

                    I was only joking

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      Heh.

                      Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                      1 Reply Last reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups