Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Hegseth to Anthropic: Nice company you got there…

Hegseth to Anthropic: Nice company you got there…

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
43 Posts 7 Posters 265 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote last edited by
    #28

    cause Xai is Gai

    AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 89th

      cause Xai is Gai

      AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote last edited by
      #29

      @89th said in Hegseth to Anthropic: Nice company you got there…:

      cause Xai is Gai

      And Gai means "chicken."
      https://www.gainyc.com/ 😋

      1 Reply Last reply
      • AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote last edited by Axtremus
        #30

        Don't think there is a meaningful distinction between different "versions" of a large AI model. It costs way too much for a company to perform parallel trainings to develop two significantly different "versions."

        If the underlying AI model is the same, then putting different "guardrails" around the model gives little confidence that a tech savvy user (like the Pentagon) won't have the capability to get around those guardrails.

        It sounds to me Anthropic wants the Pentagon to promise (as a matter of contract) not to use its product for certain purposes, rather than trying to not provide a certain "version" of its product.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote last edited by
          #31

          https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/02/26/hegseth-anthropic-ai-model-claude/

          Hegseth wants Anthropic to modify its contract to allow “any lawful use” of the technology. Anthropic is willing to rewrite its current terms of use but not to include mass surveillance of Americans or accommodate weapons that operate without a person in the loop to make the final decision.

          It seems WaPo's Editorial Board reads the situation as I do: it's a contractual "terms of use" issue, not a "product version" issue.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote last edited by
            #32

            https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote last edited by
              #33

              OpenAI is in negotiations with the DoD to take over for Anthropic. I hope the "supply chain risk" threat is just negotiation hot air. I suspect it will prove to be, but who knows.

              In the letter, Anthropic acknowledges that the law is currently ambiguous to non-existent. Their concerns are ethical rather than (currently) legal, and I think the DoD is well within its duties to find a vendor who will not impose their own ethical constraints.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #34

                The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                  #35

                  Now it’s the Defense Production Act.

                  Hegseth can’t decide if Anthropic is a risk to national security or essential to national security.

                  The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • markM Offline
                    markM Offline
                    mark
                    wrote last edited by
                    #36

                    We have very dangerous idiots running our country.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #37

                      The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote last edited by
                        #38

                        Srsly, the alternative would have done better than this.

                        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                        • AxtremusA Axtremus

                          Srsly, the alternative would have done better than this.

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote last edited by
                          #39

                          @Axtremus said in Hegseth to Anthropic: Nice company you got there…:

                          Srsly, the alternative would have done better than this.

                          As would the county dog catcher.

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • X Offline
                            X Offline
                            xenon
                            wrote last edited by
                            #40

                            Unmitigated idiocy at the helm.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • HoraceH Offline
                              HoraceH Offline
                              Horace
                              wrote last edited by
                              #41

                              The threat to classify Anthropic as a supply chain threat is idiotic. The conflicting motivations of a company that brands itself with the highest ethical standards, but who want to provide cutting edge technology to the DoD, seems reasonable and even inevitable.

                              Education is extremely important.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • AxtremusA Offline
                                AxtremusA Offline
                                Axtremus
                                wrote last edited by
                                #42

                                https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/trump-bans-anthropic-government-use-rcna261055

                                ... “OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted on X Friday night that the company had struck a deal with the Department of Defense to deploy its models on the department’s classified networks.”

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #43

                                  The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups