Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Ah the beautiful words from our President

Ah the beautiful words from our President

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
21 Posts 8 Posters 213 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    Women can parallel park.

    AxtremusA Offline
    AxtremusA Offline
    Axtremus
    wrote last edited by
    #12

    @jon-nyc said in Ah the beautiful words from our President:

    Women can parallel park.

    Also less offensive than the remarks quoted in the opening post.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nycJ Offline
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #13

      How about 'Racial discrimination is ok, in fact it's morally required, as long as you get the valence right.'

      “In the 25 years that I served in the United States Congress, Republicans never, ever, one time agreed on what a health care proposal should look like. Not once.”

      • Former Speaker of the House John Boehner
      AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        How about 'Racial discrimination is ok, in fact it's morally required, as long as you get the valence right.'

        AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote last edited by
        #14

        @jon-nyc said in Ah the beautiful words from our President:

        How about 'Racial discrimination is ok, in fact it's morally required, as long as you get the valence right.'

        About as offensive as the remarks quoted in the opening post.

        Did you get that quote from somewhere or you just paraphrased?

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by jon-nyc
          #15

          In practice the believers tend to euphemise it. Though Ibrahm X Kendi is honest enough to call it discrimination and has certainly expressed the same sentiment as the quote.

          “In the 25 years that I served in the United States Congress, Republicans never, ever, one time agreed on what a health care proposal should look like. Not once.”

          • Former Speaker of the House John Boehner
          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
            #16

            Example: ‘The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination’.

            It doesn’t take much reading of him to figure out that he thinks that such discrimination is a moral imperative.

            “In the 25 years that I served in the United States Congress, Republicans never, ever, one time agreed on what a health care proposal should look like. Not once.”

            • Former Speaker of the House John Boehner
            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              In practice the believers tend to euphemise it. Though Ibrahm X Kendi is honest enough to call it discrimination and has certainly expressed the same sentiment as the quote.

              RenaudaR Offline
              RenaudaR Offline
              Renauda
              wrote last edited by Renauda
              #17

              @jon-nyc

              In practice the believers tend to euphemise it.

              One recalls on this very discussion board, the euphemistic two-bit thug epithet to characterise the 44th President. I believe it was reprised, in a now appreciable rare appearance here, in another thread by its erstwhile author just these past few days.

              Elbows up!

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Offline
                MikM Offline
                Mik
                wrote last edited by
                #18

                He's massively overreacting to the shooting in DC. One, count them, one, Afghan refugee went nuts.

                From Gemini:

                how many of the afghan refugees from the end of the war have committed crimes here

                It is difficult to provide an exact, comprehensive number of crimes committed specifically by Afghan evacuees from the 2021 evacuation because:

                Public data does not typically break down crime statistics by specific refugee or humanitarian parole group. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other agencies track arrests and convictions for "criminal aliens," but this data is generally categorized by broader metrics like immigration status or type of crime, not by country of origin for recent refugee cohorts.

                A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General audit did identify a small number of Afghan evacuees who were either on or added to the terrorist watchlist as of May 2023. Specifically:

                55 Afghan evacuees were identified by the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) as of May 2023.

                As of July 2024, nine of these evacuees reportedly remained on the watchlist and were being tracked. The remaining 46 were removed after the FBI determined they were no longer considered a threat.

                Broader Context on Immigrants and Crime:

                General research on crime rates among immigrants, including unauthorized immigrants, and the U.S.-born population consistently finds that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than people born in the United States.

                One study indicated that U.S. natives are 11.6 times more likely to be incarcerated than Afghan immigrants as a whole (a figure that predates the 2021 evacuation but provides context on the broader Afghan immigrant community).

                Another study found no statistically significant correlation between an increased immigrant share of the population and an increase in the total crime rate.

                While there is no single, publicly released number for criminal convictions among the tens of thousands of Afghans evacuated since 2021, the vetting process for the evacuees has been a significant point of review by federal oversight agencies.

                "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Mik

                  He's massively overreacting to the shooting in DC. One, count them, one, Afghan refugee went nuts.

                  From Gemini:

                  how many of the afghan refugees from the end of the war have committed crimes here

                  It is difficult to provide an exact, comprehensive number of crimes committed specifically by Afghan evacuees from the 2021 evacuation because:

                  Public data does not typically break down crime statistics by specific refugee or humanitarian parole group. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and other agencies track arrests and convictions for "criminal aliens," but this data is generally categorized by broader metrics like immigration status or type of crime, not by country of origin for recent refugee cohorts.

                  A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General audit did identify a small number of Afghan evacuees who were either on or added to the terrorist watchlist as of May 2023. Specifically:

                  55 Afghan evacuees were identified by the Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) as of May 2023.

                  As of July 2024, nine of these evacuees reportedly remained on the watchlist and were being tracked. The remaining 46 were removed after the FBI determined they were no longer considered a threat.

                  Broader Context on Immigrants and Crime:

                  General research on crime rates among immigrants, including unauthorized immigrants, and the U.S.-born population consistently finds that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than people born in the United States.

                  One study indicated that U.S. natives are 11.6 times more likely to be incarcerated than Afghan immigrants as a whole (a figure that predates the 2021 evacuation but provides context on the broader Afghan immigrant community).

                  Another study found no statistically significant correlation between an increased immigrant share of the population and an increase in the total crime rate.

                  While there is no single, publicly released number for criminal convictions among the tens of thousands of Afghans evacuated since 2021, the vetting process for the evacuees has been a significant point of review by federal oversight agencies.

                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote last edited by
                  #19

                  @Mik said in Ah the beautiful words from our President:

                  He's massively overreacting to the shooting in DC

                  Never let an opportunity go to waste

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote last edited by
                    #20

                    Especially when it goes where you've already decided to.

                    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote last edited by
                      #21

                      Yup, plus what’s the worse that could happen by placing troops where they aren’t needed?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups