Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. This week in lawfare

This week in lawfare

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
68 Posts 9 Posters 1.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Mik

    Cohen seems to think there's a case in the Comey indictment and he's pretty experienced with how a weaponized DOJ works.

    https://www.facebook.com/reel/836909622131967

    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor PhibesD Offline
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote last edited by
    #61

    @Mik said in This week in lawfare:

    Cohen seems to think there's a case in the Comey indictment and he's pretty experienced with how a weaponized DOJ works.

    https://www.facebook.com/reel/836909622131967

    I would humbly suggest that he's not the most reliable of commentators.

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      The weight of online punditry that's come across my feed seems to think the Bolton indictment is pretty serious.

      Link to video

      Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote last edited by
      #62

      @Horace said in This week in lawfare:

      The weight of online punditry that's come across my feed seems to think the Bolton indictment is pretty serious.

      Well I've certainly been wrong many times before, although admittedly I look at an awful lot less online punditry than most people.

      I was only joking

      HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
      • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

        @Horace said in This week in lawfare:

        The weight of online punditry that's come across my feed seems to think the Bolton indictment is pretty serious.

        Well I've certainly been wrong many times before, although admittedly I look at an awful lot less online punditry than most people.

        HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote last edited by
        #63

        @Doctor-Phibes said in This week in lawfare:

        @Horace said in This week in lawfare:

        The weight of online punditry that's come across my feed seems to think the Bolton indictment is pretty serious.

        Well I've certainly been wrong many times before, although admittedly I look at an awful lot less online punditry than most people.

        I forgive you for not being in tune with online punditry, but I'm not sure what your assumptions about the Bolton case are based on, other than "if Trump did it, it's stupid".

        Education is extremely important.

        Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Horace

          @Doctor-Phibes said in This week in lawfare:

          @Horace said in This week in lawfare:

          The weight of online punditry that's come across my feed seems to think the Bolton indictment is pretty serious.

          Well I've certainly been wrong many times before, although admittedly I look at an awful lot less online punditry than most people.

          I forgive you for not being in tune with online punditry, but I'm not sure what your assumptions about the Bolton case are based on, other than "if Trump did it, it's stupid".

          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor PhibesD Offline
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
          #64

          @Horace said in This week in lawfare:

          I forgive you for not being in tune with online punditry, but I'm not sure what your assumptions about the Bolton case are based on, other than "if Trump did it, it's stupid".

          It's been a pretty reliable method for predictions thus far.

          My assumption is mainly based on the fact that I'd be a little surprised if somebody as smart as Bolton would set himself up for this. Obviously coupled with Trumps history of vindictive and petty behaviour, which nobody is likely to deny.

          I was only joking

          1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Offline
            HoraceH Offline
            Horace
            wrote last edited by
            #65

            Apparently, this investigation started under Biden. Or so the guy at my first link says.

            Education is extremely important.

            Doctor PhibesD 1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Horace

              Apparently, this investigation started under Biden. Or so the guy at my first link says.

              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor PhibesD Offline
              Doctor Phibes
              wrote last edited by Doctor Phibes
              #66

              @Horace said in This week in lawfare:

              Apparently, this investigation started under Biden. Or so the guy at my first link says.

              The reason I don't watch much online punditry (other than having other things I'd rather do) is that most of them pull this kind of stuff out of their arses. Given time and inclination I'm sure I could find some other self-appointed experts who hold the opposite view.

              We shall see.

              I was only joking

              HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
              • Doctor PhibesD Doctor Phibes

                @Horace said in This week in lawfare:

                Apparently, this investigation started under Biden. Or so the guy at my first link says.

                The reason I don't watch much online punditry (other than having other things I'd rather do) is that most of them pull this kind of stuff out of their arses. Given time and inclination I'm sure I could find some other self-appointed experts who hold the opposite view.

                We shall see.

                HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote last edited by
                #67

                @Doctor-Phibes said in This week in lawfare:

                @Horace said in This week in lawfare:

                Apparently, this investigation started under Biden. Or so the guy at my first link says.

                The reason I don't watch much online punditry (other than having other things I'd rather do) is that most of them pull this kind of stuff out of their arses. Given time and inclination I'm sure I could find some other self-appointed experts who hold the opposite view.

                We shall see.

                He was referencing a NYT piece when he said it. Which of course he could still be pulling out of his ass. My confidence that he wasn't pulling it out of his ass, exceeds my confidence that Bolton is too smart to be guilty of what he is accused of in the indictment.

                Education is extremely important.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Offline
                  HoraceH Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote last edited by
                  #68

                  He didn't say the investigation started under biden, he said it accelerated under biden. It started under Trump 1.0.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups