Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.2k Posts 20 Posters 106.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
    #962

    It could be a head fake to get Saturday’s ultimatum off the news cycle.

    eta: posted this before seeing bach’s last

    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • bachophileB Offline
      bachophileB Offline
      bachophile
      wrote last edited by
      #963

      oil creeping up again...

      1 Reply Last reply
      • bachophileB Offline
        bachophileB Offline
        bachophile
        wrote last edited by
        #964

        im telling you, the news cycle is measured in minutes

        1 Reply Last reply
        • 89th8 Offline
          89th8 Offline
          89th
          wrote last edited by
          #965

          I'm watching various KC-135 stratotankers flying from Tel Aviv over to the gulf and back, I see at least 5 in the air right now. It's interesting to see how their routes just barely stays south of the Iraqi border (aka stays in saudi arabian airspace until it gets to the gulf).

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #966

            Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #967

              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 Offline
                89th8 Offline
                89th
                wrote last edited by
                #968

                Swamp gold, baby

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor PhibesD Offline
                  Doctor Phibes
                  wrote last edited by
                  #969

                  What's really sad is how predictable this is. Making huge amounts of money from the on-again, off-again tariffs was bad enough. This is grotesque.

                  I was only joking

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #970

                    Sunny thoughts from Ehud Barak.

                    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #971

                      Administration is talking to the Iranian Parliament speaker. Unclear what his relationship is with the IRGC.

                      Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #972

                        Back to the point from the Economist piece about both sides having maximalist demands.

                        WSJ: Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, responding to mediation efforts, is demanding firm guarantees the war will not restart, a halt to Israeli strikes on Hezbollah, the shutdown of U.S. bases in the Gulf, and compensation for its losses.

                        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • MikM Offline
                          MikM Offline
                          Mik
                          wrote last edited by
                          #973

                          Keep bombing the guard. And Hezbollah.

                          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                            Administration is talking to the Iranian Parliament speaker. Unclear what his relationship is with the IRGC.

                            RenaudaR Offline
                            RenaudaR Offline
                            Renauda
                            wrote last edited by
                            #974

                            @jon-nyc said:

                            Administration is talking to the Iranian Parliament speaker. Unclear what his relationship is with the IRGC.

                            About as distant as from the Iranian state decision making apparatus as was the President of the USSR in its day. In other words he would be little more than an errand boy for the IRGC and what's left of the Ayatollahs. Close to absolute zero authority next to the Iranian President.

                            The country is run by the Spiritual Council and its bodyguard, the IRGC.

                            Elbows up!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote last edited by
                              #975

                              Something big happening this weekend?

                              Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote last edited by
                                #976

                                Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #977

                                  Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • MikM Offline
                                    MikM Offline
                                    Mik
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #978

                                    VDH is on board.

                                    🚨 Victor Davis Hanson: THE SIGNALS ARE ALL POINTING THE SAME DIRECTION

                                    No U.S. analyst knows better how to cut through the fog of war than Stanford University Prof. @VDHanson.

                                    In the clip below, Hanson, who’s studied how wars end for 50 years, says the tide has turned in America’s favor against Iran. Forget the rancid propaganda flowing from all quarters related to the Iran conflict and how it is going - Hanson says look at how everyone else is behaving.

                                    Hanson’s Key Points:

                                    • Europeans: They never touch a conflict until they smell victory. Early on? Crickets. Now they’re quietly moving assets and offering support. Pure calculation — they’ve read the battlefield and decided which side wins.

                                    • Gulf petro-states: Saudis, Emiratis, Qataris survive by reading the room perfectly. They’re expelling Iranian attachés, silently intercepting Iranian missiles over their capitals, and the UAE just reaffirmed its $1.4 trillion investment commitment to the U.S. mid-war. These are not gestures — they’re bets. And they’re all-in on America.

                                    • Al Jazeera: The Qatari state network that usually bashes U.S. actions (and hosts Hamas offices) is now calling America’s bombing campaign “brilliant” and “underestimated.” When the outlet that hosts both the biggest U.S. air base and Hamas praises U.S. effectiveness, the message is unmistakable: they think we’re winning.

                                    • Military reality: A-10 Warthogs and Apache gunships are now flying strike missions inside Iranian airspace at will. These slow, low-flying platforms only appear when enemy air defenses are effectively gone. Confirms what’s really happening on the ground.

                                    Iran’s only play left is rope-a-dope: drag it out, hope U.S. public opinion flips, pray midterms pressure Trump to quit.

                                    VDH’s verdict: If Trump sees it through — and he will — the regime falls. Not in years. Pretty soon.

                                    Bottom line: Watch what people do, not what they say. Every player with skin in the game is betting on America.

                                    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                      taiwan_girlT Offline
                                      taiwan_girl
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #979

                                      “TAVAJOH! TAVAJOH! TAVAJOH!” a man’s voice announces, before going on to narrate a string of numbers in no apparent order, slowly and rhythmically. After nearly two hours, the calls of “Attention!” in Persian stop, only to resume again hours later.

                                      The broadcast has been playing twice a day on a shortwave frequency since the start of the US-Israel attack on Iran on February 28.

                                      According to Priyom, an organization which tracks and analyses global military and intelligence use of shortwave radio, using established radio-location techniques, the broadcast was first heard as the US bombing of Iran began. It has since played on the 7910 kHz shortwave frequency like clockwork—at 02.00 UTC and again at 18.00 UTC.

                                      and

                                      Number stations are shortwave radio broadcasts that play strings of numbers or codes that sound random—like the one now heard in Iran. “It is an encrypted radio message used by foreign intelligence services, often as part of a complex operation by intelligence agencies and militaries,” says Maris Goldmanis, a Latvian historian and avid numbers stations researcher.

                                      Number stations are most commonly associated with espionage. “For intelligence agencies, it is important to communicate with their spies to gather intelligence,” says John Sipher, a former US intelligence officer who served 28 years in the CIA’s National Clandestine Service. “This is not always possible in person due to political constraints or conflict. This is where number stations come in.”

                                      and

                                      Because the broadcasts are encrypted and designed to be covert, those details may remain unclear for years, Goldmanis says. The structured nature of the transmission—its fixed schedule and consistent use of frequencies—further suggests it is part of a planned operation.

                                      One theory is that the broadcasts originate from Iran itself, as part of its wartime intelligence efforts—particularly if traditional covert communication channels have been disrupted. “Such a station would have appeared if the Iranian intelligence service had lost its usual way of covert communication with the Iranian agents abroad because of the Israeli and US strikes and was now required to use a shortwave radio to send messages and instructions,” he says.

                                      However, another more widely backed theory is that perhaps the US, Israel, or an Iranian opposition group in exile that is based in Europe is using shortwave transmitters to reach allies inside. “There is also a suggestion that these broadcasts are used to confuse and distract the Iranian security,” Goldmanis adds.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #980

                                        General Mattis:

                                        “Iran right now, if we declared victory, they would now say they own the strait,” Mattis said during the CERAweek by S&P Global conference. “You’d see a tax for every ship that goes through.”
                                        “We’re in a tough spot, ladies and gentlemen,” Mattis said. “I can’t identify a lot of options.”

                                        https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/23/mattis-ending-iran-war-now-cede-hormuz-00841109

                                        Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          AndyD
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #981

                                          So, any guesses where the Marines and Paras will be deployed?

                                          1 Reply Last reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups