Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Epstein File

The Epstein File

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
315 Posts 16 Posters 30.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #306

    Again if there were leads that pointed to criminal behavior I’m sure they’d have been followed.

    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

    HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      Again if there were leads that pointed to criminal behavior I’m sure they’d have been followed.

      HoraceH Offline
      HoraceH Offline
      Horace
      wrote last edited by
      #307

      @jon-nyc said in The Epstein File:

      Again if there were leads that pointed to criminal behavior I’m sure they’d have been followed.

      I don't think that's an earned "again". You've gone to some lengths to claim that, due to ethics, investigating leads to Trump in the Epstein files would be uncouth for the Biden administration. But I'm happy to hear you say that clearly, and that you agree with the rest of the world that if there was evidence of criminal behavior on Trump's part in the Epstein files, we'd have heard about it while Biden was in office.

      Education is extremely important.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by
        #308

        IMG_9580.jpeg

        IMG_9581.jpeg

        The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote last edited by
          #309

          In prior engagements you have gone to some lengths to make the claims I've told you about. In your first screen cap'ed message there, I was assuming you were using a loophole where the evidence was damning right off the bat from the files, barely any investigation required. "Leads" which would require investigations were where you have handwaved a circumstantial case that the Biden admin would find it uncouth to try very hard.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #310

            I think you’ve moved the goal posts. In July in this very thread we were arguing about whether the Garland DoJ would leak incriminating info on Trump. That question seems to have been settled.

            IMG_9585.jpeg

            IMG_9587.jpeg

            IMG_9588.jpeg

            IMG_9589.png

            The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote last edited by Horace
              #311

              I could go through the threads where we've engaged in this and find your claims that the DOJ does not expand investigations as an unwritten ethical rule, and that the Biden DOJ would not have gone out of their way to comb through the files for legally incriminating leads to Trump. Yes we also talked about leaks, and you have a stronger case there, though it's still arguable, since we hardly have proof that there is any embarrassing stuff about Trump in those files that would move the needle. We have proof that Trump wanted his name redacted, but no proof that without the redactions, any needle would have been moved.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                #312

                I don’t think you’d ever find me making such a case. My position has been that all the evidence suggests the garland DoJ operated by the book as far as we know. The ‘book’ is fine with expanding investigations if thats where evidence leads. Famous cases are the result of such expansions, from Anthony Weiner’s laptop to Rob Blagojovich to Arthur Andersen’s conviction in Enron.

                The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Offline
                  HoraceH Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote last edited by
                  #313

                  It'll have to wait for a few days. Merry Christmas!

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    A monumental fuck up.

                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #314

                    said in The Epstein File:

                    A monumental fuck up.

                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote last edited by
                      #315

                      That's hilarious. Someone at the DOJ thought if they just highlighted the text and made the background black, it would be redacted.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups