Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Elon discovers the constitution

Elon discovers the constitution

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
41 Posts 9 Posters 626 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mik
    wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 13:05 last edited by Mik
    #3

    Depends on how much they are ruling based on law and how much on the feels.

    On the other hand, our government was designed so that quick action without consensus is discouraged, so we are seeing the balancing act at work. To me it proves that our system of checks and balances works.

    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

    1 Reply Last reply
    • J Jolly
      15 Feb 2025, 13:00

      He's right.

      Judges are supposed to call strikes and balls, based on individual cases. What we have now, is district court shopping and generalized appeals to the court.

      The system needs refinement and reform.

      J Online
      J Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 13:15 last edited by jon-nyc
      #4

      @Jolly said in Elon discovers the constitution:

      He's right.

      Judges are supposed to call strikes and balls, based on individual cases. What we have now, is district court shopping and generalized appeals to the court.

      The system needs refinement and reform.

      Calling balls and strikes takes time, which is why the injured party can often seek a temporary injunction while their case is being heard. It would an exercise in triviality to present a set of facts in which you’d suddenly be Mr Temporary Injinction.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      J 1 Reply Last reply 15 Feb 2025, 13:42
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 13:30 last edited by
        #5

        Wish I could remember where I read it, but I went through an essay over the last couple of days that laid out four or five points for judicial reform.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mik
          wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 13:40 last edited by
          #6

          I am skeptical of judicial reform. I don't know the details of that essay, but every suggestion I've seen can be summed up as "We're not getting the rulings we want and here's what we could do to turn it in our favor". Just a scant 4 years ago the Dems were screaming that SCOTUS had to be reformed. As I recall that suggestion was not greeted here with open arms.

          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

          1 Reply Last reply
          • J jon-nyc
            15 Feb 2025, 13:15

            @Jolly said in Elon discovers the constitution:

            He's right.

            Judges are supposed to call strikes and balls, based on individual cases. What we have now, is district court shopping and generalized appeals to the court.

            The system needs refinement and reform.

            Calling balls and strikes takes time, which is why the injured party can often seek a temporary injunction while their case is being heard. It would an exercise in triviality to present a set of facts in which you’d suddenly be Mr Temporary Injinction.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 13:42 last edited by
            #7

            @jon-nyc said in Elon discovers the constitution:

            It would an exercise in triviality to present a set of facts in which you’d suddenly be Mr Temporary Injinction.

            I don't know about injinctions, but I think on judicial filings where the purpose is to blunt the will of the Executive or Congress, it should be a bit different process. Instead of one judge issuing a stay, make it a three judge panel. If the majority of the panel rules against the plaintiff, fast-track the case to SCOTUS.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              Horace
              wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 13:45 last edited by
              #8

              I'm hopelessly ignorant about this. Is it the case that any federal judge (how many are there?) can exercise veto power over any executive order?

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • J Online
                J Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 14:14 last edited by jon-nyc
                #9

                No. Anyone who believes the EO or law is unlawful and is harmed by it can sue, and can request a temporary injunction while their case is heard. The temporary injunction often requires irreparable harm to be shown (harm that isn’t easily reversible if they win later).

                The administration is a party to that, and if they have a good argument as to why the injunction shouldn’t happen they may prevail. Usually ‘cause we don’t wanna wait’ isn’t enough. It would normally require irrevocable harm to the administration’s interest. You could imagine a law with a built in sell-by date after which it’s moot.

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • J Online
                  J Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 14:19 last edited by jon-nyc
                  #10

                  This really does come down to Elon’s ignorance.

                  Trump’s legal team knows they’re testing legal boundaries and that this is exactly what that looks like.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  D A 2 Replies Last reply 15 Feb 2025, 15:20
                  • J jon-nyc
                    15 Feb 2025, 14:19

                    This really does come down to Elon’s ignorance.

                    Trump’s legal team knows they’re testing legal boundaries and that this is exactly what that looks like.

                    D Online
                    D Online
                    Doctor Phibes
                    wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 15:20 last edited by
                    #11

                    @jon-nyc said in Elon discovers the constitution:

                    This really does come down to Elon’s ignorance.

                    Well, either that or he's just being a troll.

                    It's generally impossible to tell with that guy.

                    I was only joking

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • J Online
                      J Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 15:42 last edited by
                      #12

                      The truth is the opposite of what Elon says.

                      If a citizen can’t challenge a presidential action that causes him direct harm in court, we don’t live in a democracy.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • J Online
                        J Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 15:56 last edited by
                        #13

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Copper
                          wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 16:27 last edited by
                          #14

                          If an employee is mismanaging funds, a superior should have access to this information.

                          If it harms the mismanaging employee, good.

                          Please, go ahead and harm the mismanaging employee.

                          And then find the superior that didn't already do that.

                          Thank you for your service Mr. Musk.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            Horace
                            wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 17:12 last edited by
                            #15

                            I remain hopeful and open minded that the DOGE product will be for the good, regardless of how easy it is to throw stones at the project.

                            Education is extremely important.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mik
                              wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 17:51 last edited by
                              #16

                              Indeed. But it was never going to be accomplished without any pain.

                              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 18:07 last edited by
                                #17

                                Oh, there will be blood.

                                We should have never put ourselves in the position where payment on the national debt exceeds the military budget.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • J Online
                                  J Online
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on 15 Feb 2025, 18:37 last edited by jon-nyc
                                  #18

                                  Wait 3 years. The average maturity of our debt is 6 years. Interest rates started climbing three years ago. Half the debt will need to be refinanced at today’s rates.

                                  And the house is planning to add 4T more debt in the next 2+ years too.

                                  It’s pretty scary.

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  X 1 Reply Last reply 16 Feb 2025, 17:45
                                  • J jon-nyc
                                    15 Feb 2025, 14:19

                                    This really does come down to Elon’s ignorance.

                                    Trump’s legal team knows they’re testing legal boundaries and that this is exactly what that looks like.

                                    A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Axtremus
                                    wrote on 16 Feb 2025, 04:27 last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @jon-nyc said in Elon discovers the constitution:

                                    This really does come down to Elon’s ignorance.

                                    Figure Elon passed his citizenship test before naturalization. Think he didn’t study or just forgot?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • H Offline
                                      H Offline
                                      Horace
                                      wrote on 16 Feb 2025, 04:31 last edited by
                                      #20

                                      The citizenship test is super easy. Like, measured by units of difficulty equal to the difficulty of getting a gender studies PhD at an Ivy League school, it’s only a five. Only five times as hard as the gender studies PhD from Harvard. You can literally study 30 minutes before the test and pass.

                                      Education is extremely important.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        LuFins Dad
                                        wrote on 16 Feb 2025, 15:44 last edited by LuFins Dad
                                        #21

                                        I hate to be the obnoxious conservative, here, but you all are wrong, including and especially Elon. We are not living on a democracy. We’re living in a Democratic Republic. The relationship and balance of powers between the executive and the judiciary have absolutely nothing to do with democracy. The judges are not elected, they are appointed by the Executive with advice and consent of the Senate.

                                        The Brad

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          Jolly
                                          wrote on 16 Feb 2025, 15:59 last edited by
                                          #22

                                          Party pooper.

                                          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes

                                          12/41

                                          15 Feb 2025, 15:42

                                          topic:navigator.unread, 29

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          12 out of 41
                                          • First post
                                            12/41
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups