Trump goes there.
-
What are the odds that by 2028, we'll see an order from Trump to include his face on the $100. His reason will be that Franklin wasn't even popular enough to be President! SAD
@89th said in Trump goes there.:
What are the odds that by 2028, we'll see an order from Trump to include his face on the $100. His reason will be that Franklin wasn't even popular enough to be President! SAD
Already started. A goat statue in Mar A Lago
(I am guessing that probably technically, it is illegal to deface the money like this)
-
What are the odds that by 2028, we'll see an order from Trump to include his face on the $100. His reason will be that Franklin wasn't even popular enough to be President! SAD
@89th said in Trump goes there.:
What are the odds that by 2028, we'll see an order from Trump to include his face on the $100. His reason will be that Franklin wasn't even popular enough to be President! SAD
Hamilton was a perennial target of Republicans that wanted to put Reagan on the 10 for the same reason. The musical probably saved us from refacing the 10 for another two generations.
Funny to think of a GOP enthralled by Reagan. Seems so quaint.
-
-
-
Heard an interesting counter argument, this proposal would require us to mint more nickels which apparently cost 13c each or something.
Not sure how it all nets out or if cost really would be why you’d do this anyway, but it seems a valid consideration.
@jon-nyc said in Trump goes there.:
Heard an interesting counter argument
You heard it here at post #21. 555
-
https://www.inc.com/steve-strauss/what-the-end-of-the-penny-means-for-business/91149619
Goes into the physiological of pricing.
-
-
I mostly agree with this.
-
The whole point of “it costs more to produce than its actual worth” is ridiculous.