Cal-ignore-ya
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 14:45 last edited by
As long as it's without my money, fine.
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 14:48 last edited by
allow men into women's sports
Not just any men
Men who suffer from a specific mental health problem.
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 14:59 last edited by
That’s brilliant. Do you think that the $131B in federal funding for public schools should be spent in other states? Or should it just go against the debt?
Also, will the Federal Government also stop giving Pell Grants and college loans to kids in California? Or should they keep this focused on the K-12 level since the NCAA are pulling the trannies from competition?
-
allow men into women's sports
Not just any men
Men who suffer from a specific mental health problem.
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 15:00 last edited by@Copper said in Cal-ignore-ya:
allow men into women's sports
Not just any men
Men who suffer from a specific mental health problem.
That disproportionately lands them in jail for violence and sexual abuse.
-
That’s brilliant. Do you think that the $131B in federal funding for public schools should be spent in other states? Or should it just go against the debt?
Also, will the Federal Government also stop giving Pell Grants and college loans to kids in California? Or should they keep this focused on the K-12 level since the NCAA are pulling the trannies from competition?
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 15:04 last edited by -
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 17:48 last edited by
So … you folks prefer “federal control” to “local control” now, right?
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 18:04 last edited by Copper 2 Sept 2025, 18:04
@Axtremus said in Cal-ignore-ya:
So … you folks prefer “federal control” to “local control” now, right?
It's more like smart control vs stupid control.
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 18:14 last edited by Mik 2 Sept 2025, 18:14
@Axtremus said in Cal-ignore-ya:
So … you folks prefer “federal control” to “local control” now, right?
Your post makes no sense. It was Biden's federal interpretation of Title IX that started this.
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 18:49 last edited by
@Axtremus said in Cal-ignore-ya:
So … you folks prefer “federal control” to “local control” now, right?
If local control means putting creeps that have a MUCH higher statistical chance of violence and sexual assault in a girls locker room or bathroom, then I’m all for federal control.
If local control means that schools find it permissible to socially transition kids with no parental rights in the matter, I’m all for federal control.
If local control means that the powers to be think chemically castrating young children and putting them on drugs that will permanently damage their health and mental stability, then I’m all for federal control.
If local control means school choice and deciding on phonics vs guided reading for teaching reading, then I am all for local control.
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 19:42 last edited by
I personally never understood the equal protection afforded to transgender athletes to compete in women's sports. I am all for treating them with all the same rights afforded to any American, but this crosses the line in my humble opinion. It also speaks loudly to a determining factor for a man to have such a thing done to them. The whole public restroom debacle is a nothing burger to me versus bringing an unfair competitive edge to women's sports. I dunno, call me conservative in this subject matter.
-
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 20:22 last edited by
It’s an 85%-15% issue, but it also wasn’t a very important issue for most people until Biden messed with Title IX. Then it became a much larger concern.
And now the Cass report and many other studies are coming out showing that GAC is not only not helpful, but may actually be damaging to children with genuine Dysphoria, a situation that cures itself over 90% of the time through a natural puberty.
-
It’s an 85%-15% issue, but it also wasn’t a very important issue for most people until Biden messed with Title IX. Then it became a much larger concern.
And now the Cass report and many other studies are coming out showing that GAC is not only not helpful, but may actually be damaging to children with genuine Dysphoria, a situation that cures itself over 90% of the time through a natural puberty.
wrote on 9 Feb 2025, 20:29 last edited by@LuFins-Dad check you message LD.
-
I personally never understood the equal protection afforded to transgender athletes to compete in women's sports. I am all for treating them with all the same rights afforded to any American, but this crosses the line in my humble opinion. It also speaks loudly to a determining factor for a man to have such a thing done to them. The whole public restroom debacle is a nothing burger to me versus bringing an unfair competitive edge to women's sports. I dunno, call me conservative in this subject matter.
wrote on 10 Feb 2025, 01:49 last edited by@NobodySock said in Cal-ignore-ya:
I personally never understood the equal protection afforded to transgender athletes to compete in women's sports. I am all for treating them with all the same rights afforded to any American, but this crosses the line in my humble opinion. It also speaks loudly to a determining factor for a man to have such a thing done to them. The whole public restroom debacle is a nothing burger to me versus bringing an unfair competitive edge to women's sports. I dunno, call me conservative in this subject matter.
Hmm. Maybe there’s hope for you yet!
