Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The number? Thousands.

The number? Thousands.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
16 Posts 7 Posters 123 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    It’s a major blind spot of both right and left. When their guy is in office they are largely supportive of increased executive authority forgetting that someday the other side will hold the office.

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 89th

      You know the "thousands" number was made up by... Trump. Right?

      Imagine if Biden asked the FBI to fire anyone involved in investigating Hunter Biden. Political retribution against people who were doing their job should concern you, but I suppose the horse is already dead.

      JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      @89th said in The number? Thousands.:

      You know the "thousands" number was made up by... Trump. Right?

      Imagine if Biden asked the FBI to fire anyone involved in investigating Hunter Biden. Political retribution against people who were doing their job should concern you, but I suppose the horse is already dead.

      The number is what Driscoll said.

      If you have further information, please share.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      89th8 1 Reply Last reply
      • JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        BTW, the horse never existed.

        There is no doubt in my mind or millions of other Americans, that the FBI went from law enforcement to selective persecution.

        If you don't believe that, look at the last POTUS election results.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          NobodySock
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          One of the "shiny" objects the Right keeps repeating over and over. That dangerous fentanyl that is overwhelming all of us gives border control more purpose. The fact that this fentanyl only shortens the lives of those who are already currently shortening their lifespans (drug addicts) should actually give peace to the Right. What do they care about people hell bent on destroying their lives?

          JollyJ taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            @89th said in The number? Thousands.:

            You know the "thousands" number was made up by... Trump. Right?

            Imagine if Biden asked the FBI to fire anyone involved in investigating Hunter Biden. Political retribution against people who were doing their job should concern you, but I suppose the horse is already dead.

            The number is what Driscoll said.

            If you have further information, please share.

            89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            @Jolly said in The number? Thousands.:

            @89th said in The number? Thousands.:

            You know the "thousands" number was made up by... Trump. Right?

            Imagine if Biden asked the FBI to fire anyone involved in investigating Hunter Biden. Political retribution against people who were doing their job should concern you, but I suppose the horse is already dead.

            The number is what Driscoll said.

            If you have further information, please share.

            My mistake, I misread the sentence in the article, I thought the pronoun was referring to Trump.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • N NobodySock

              One of the "shiny" objects the Right keeps repeating over and over. That dangerous fentanyl that is overwhelming all of us gives border control more purpose. The fact that this fentanyl only shortens the lives of those who are already currently shortening their lifespans (drug addicts) should actually give peace to the Right. What do they care about people hell bent on destroying their lives?

              JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              @NobodySock said in The number? Thousands.:

              One of the "shiny" objects the Right keeps repeating over and over. That dangerous fentanyl that is overwhelming all of us gives border control more purpose. The fact that this fentanyl only shortens the lives of those who are already currently shortening their lifespans (drug addicts) should actually give peace to the Right. What do they care about people hell bent on destroying their lives?

              Yes, such monsters...

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • N NobodySock

                One of the "shiny" objects the Right keeps repeating over and over. That dangerous fentanyl that is overwhelming all of us gives border control more purpose. The fact that this fentanyl only shortens the lives of those who are already currently shortening their lifespans (drug addicts) should actually give peace to the Right. What do they care about people hell bent on destroying their lives?

                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @NobodySock said in The number? Thousands.:

                The fact that this fentanyl only shortens the lives of those who are already currently shortening their lifespans (drug addicts)

                Not to make fun of the situation, but I remember seeing a white paper about the China Tobacco Monopoly. As you may be aware. the % of people who smoke in China is quite high, and there is not as much anti-smoking trends there.

                One of the reasons given is that because tobacco is a state monopoly there, there are huge profits for the state made from tobacco sales, and supposedly, the government figures that health costs are ultimately reduced because smokers die early.

                Of course, with the population decrease that china is experiencing, there may be a turnaround in this thinking.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 89th

                  You know the "thousands" number was made up by... Trump. Right?

                  Imagine if Biden asked the FBI to fire anyone involved in investigating Hunter Biden. Political retribution against people who were doing their job should concern you, but I suppose the horse is already dead.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  @89th said in The number? Thousands.:

                  You know the "thousands" number was made up by... Trump. Right?

                  Imagine if Biden asked the FBI to fire anyone involved in investigating Hunter Biden. Political retribution against people who were doing their job should concern you, but I suppose the horse is already dead.

                  Julie Kelly reported today the actual number is approximately 6000.

                  That's a lot of manpower...

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    It’s a major blind spot of both right and left. When their guy is in office they are largely supportive of increased executive authority forgetting that someday the other side will hold the office.

                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    @jon-nyc said in The number? Thousands.:

                    It’s a major blind spot of both right and left. When their guy is in office they are largely supportive of increased executive authority forgetting that someday the other side will hold the office.

                    You know, that’s actually something that I’m kind of enjoying about all the wacky EOs being thrown against the wall. I could actually see Congress acting to limit executive authority

                    The Brad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      The court has been doing so. Let’s hope they continue.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups