Trumpenomics
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
Greg Lukianoff, CEO of FIRE:
Protectionism in the name of poor, little helpless...Hollywood!?
And that's before we even get into the morass of first amendment issues ths presents.
It's as if every day we @thefireorg get a pop quiz on First Amendment law from the weirdest Con Law 2 class ever offered. -
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
Again, as a husband of someone who loves to buy yet another toy or box of crayons when we have more than a surplus already... I very much welcome Trump's perspective on over consumption and border line hoarding. That being said, clearing out clutter isn't exactly my recommendation for economic policy.
-
Again, as a husband of someone who loves to buy yet another toy or box of crayons when we have more than a surplus already... I very much welcome Trump's perspective on over consumption and border line hoarding. That being said, clearing out clutter isn't exactly my recommendation for economic policy.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by jon-nyc 24 days ago
This is so obvious. What are the magats thinking.
WSJ: “If other countries imposed reciprocal tariffs, it could devastate Hollywood studios…The U.S. movie industry had a $15.3 billion trade surplus in 2023 and generated a positive balance of trade with every major foreign market.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
As Trump said in the interview yesterday (seriously) when asked if he takes responsibility for the economy, "The bad parts are Biden's economy, the good parts are Trump's economy." Not a surprise, but wow.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
“Did the same thing only in reverse”
Link to video
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
That was good.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by Mik 24 days ago
@Renauda said in Trumpenomics:
At the level given, it does smack of statist micromanagement.
It certainly does. Also rather of flailing.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
Fjord Motors? Sounds European. I only care about American car companies.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
There's a man who pronounces the 't' in Chevrolet, so that it rhymes with toilet.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
You know, if all of these other places would just become a part of the US, there wouldn’t be any more tariffs. Problem solved.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
We are not amused.
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
Come on… You know deep down that you really want to…
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by
Seriously, is there anything to this Alberta NEXIT push?
-
wrote 24 days ago last edited by Renauda 7 days from now
Ask the bitch we call Premier.
Not in this household there is not, and nor will there be.
-
wrote 23 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 23 days ago last edited by
Best comment:
“ Look. Instead of having three iPhones you’ll have to be happy sharing an iPhone. You could attach a cord to it and hang on the wall. Would that be so bad?”
-
Best comment:
“ Look. Instead of having three iPhones you’ll have to be happy sharing an iPhone. You could attach a cord to it and hang on the wall. Would that be so bad?”
wrote 23 days ago last edited by@jon-nyc LOL
-
wrote 23 days ago last edited by
Second best comment:
“ Tariffs are simply the name we give to the things we choose to do together.”