Trumpenomics
-
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in two key numbers: 50 and 33
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in one key question.
Does this tariff help in the coming war against China?
Lose that war, and the rest of this doesn't matter.
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 19:21 last edited by Renauda 5 days from now@Copper said in Trumpenomics:
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in two key numbers: 50 and 33
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in one key question.
Does this tariff help in the coming war against China?
Lose that war, and the rest of this doesn't matter.
Then if that is the parallel world you live in, MAGAt USA should immediately stop shitting on its friends and allies with punitive sanctions disguised as tariffs, and extortionist threats. Would help too to your perfidious demagogue president would stop licking Putin’s ass.
My next elbow will be a hell of lot harder if you come back at me with your usual disingeuous and passive aggressive snark
-
@Copper said in Trumpenomics:
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in two key numbers: 50 and 33
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in one key question.
Does this tariff help in the coming war against China?
Lose that war, and the rest of this doesn't matter.
Then if that is the parallel world you live in, MAGAt USA should immediately stop shitting on its friends and allies with punitive sanctions disguised as tariffs, and extortionist threats. Would help too to your perfidious demagogue president would stop licking Putin’s ass.
My next elbow will be a hell of lot harder if you come back at me with your usual disingeuous and passive aggressive snark
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 19:31 last edited by@Renauda said in Trumpenomics:
Would help too to your perfidious demagogue president would stop licking Putin’s ass.
Let's not rush to judgement. He may just be licking the base of his own pinky. You can't really tell.
-
@Copper said in Trumpenomics:
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in two key numbers: 50 and 33
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in one key question.
Does this tariff help in the coming war against China?
Lose that war, and the rest of this doesn't matter.
Then if that is the parallel world you live in, MAGAt USA should immediately stop shitting on its friends and allies with punitive sanctions disguised as tariffs, and extortionist threats. Would help too to your perfidious demagogue president would stop licking Putin’s ass.
My next elbow will be a hell of lot harder if you come back at me with your usual disingeuous and passive aggressive snark
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 19:37 last edited by@Renauda said in Trumpenomics:
@Copper said in Trumpenomics:
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in two key numbers: 50 and 33
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in one key question.
Does this tariff help in the coming war against China?
Lose that war, and the rest of this doesn't matter.
Then if that is the parallel world you live in, MAGAt USA should immediately stop shitting on its friends and allies with punitive sanctions disguised as tariffs, and extortionist threats. Would help too to your perfidious demagogue president would stop licking Putin’s ass.
My next elbow will be a hell of lot harder if you come back at me with your usual disingeuous and passive aggressive snark
You don't seem to be a friend.
Check your spelling.
-
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 19:37 last edited by
@Horace said in Trumpenomics:
The stock market continues to hemorrhage bigly.
Maybe it's all a cunning plan to make TruthSocial look more appealing than nVidia.
-
@Renauda said in Trumpenomics:
@Copper said in Trumpenomics:
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in two key numbers: 50 and 33
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in one key question.
Does this tariff help in the coming war against China?
Lose that war, and the rest of this doesn't matter.
Then if that is the parallel world you live in, MAGAt USA should immediately stop shitting on its friends and allies with punitive sanctions disguised as tariffs, and extortionist threats. Would help too to your perfidious demagogue president would stop licking Putin’s ass.
My next elbow will be a hell of lot harder if you come back at me with your usual disingeuous and passive aggressive snark
You don't seem to be a friend.
Check your spelling.
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 19:43 last edited by Renauda 5 days from now@Copper said in Trumpenomics:
@Renauda said in Trumpenomics:
@Copper said in Trumpenomics:
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in two key numbers: 50 and 33
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in one key question.
Does this tariff help in the coming war against China?
Lose that war, and the rest of this doesn't matter.
Then if that is the parallel world you live in, MAGAt USA should immediately stop shitting on its friends and allies with punitive sanctions disguised as tariffs, and extortionist threats. Would help too to your perfidious demagogue president would stop licking Putin’s ass.
My next elbow will be a hell of lot harder if you come back at me with your usual disingeuous and passive aggressive snark
You don't seem to be a friend.
You’re right, I am not your friend and, by the way, your disingenuous head is still up your arse.
-
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 20:21 last edited by
-
I’ve heard people say it’s all about confidence and optimism.
Perhaps investors think Trump doesn’t have the right temperament this time around.
Or maybe it’ll be fine tomorrow… who knows.
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 20:25 last edited by@xenon said in Trumpenomics:
I’ve heard people say it’s all about confidence and optimism.
Perhaps investors think Trump doesn’t have the right temperament this time around.
Or maybe it’ll be fine tomorrow… who knows.
I have confidence and optimism that Trump will pivot if it looks like the market will continue to plummet…
-
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 20:55 last edited by
-
@Renauda said in Trumpenomics:
@Copper said in Trumpenomics:
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in two key numbers: 50 and 33
Every tariff discussion should be grounded in one key question.
Does this tariff help in the coming war against China?
Lose that war, and the rest of this doesn't matter.
Then if that is the parallel world you live in, MAGAt USA should immediately stop shitting on its friends and allies with punitive sanctions disguised as tariffs, and extortionist threats. Would help too to your perfidious demagogue president would stop licking Putin’s ass.
My next elbow will be a hell of lot harder if you come back at me with your usual disingeuous and passive aggressive snark
You don't seem to be a friend.
Check your spelling.
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 21:19 last edited by Renauda 6 days from nowCheck your spelling.
Sorry I missed that earlier.
Okay then, you tell me how to spell “wanker” in American. Better than anyone else here, you are the one who ought to know.
My spelling is fine thank you and every bit as good as your’s or anyone else’s here.
-
I’ve heard people say it’s all about confidence and optimism.
Perhaps investors think Trump doesn’t have the right temperament this time around.
Or maybe it’ll be fine tomorrow… who knows.
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 22:51 last edited by@xenon said in Trumpenomics:
I’ve heard people say it’s all about confidence and optimism.
Perhaps investors think Trump doesn’t have the right temperament this time around.
Or maybe it’ll be fine tomorrow… who knows.
I think a lot of it is about perception. And stability.
-
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 22:52 last edited by
Jon must have a helluva twitter feed.
-
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 22:56 last edited by
Nobody’s talking about gas.. I just filled up at $2.80 per gallon.
-
wrote on 6 Mar 2025, 23:09 last edited by
I filled up today. $2.43/gal.
-
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 00:14 last edited by
-
Nobody’s talking about gas.. I just filled up at $2.80 per gallon.
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 00:30 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Trumpenomics:
Nobody’s talking about gas.. I just filled up at $2.80 per gallon.
And that's worth how many Grade A "Large" eggs?
-
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 00:40 last edited by
Ben Shapiro shares Warren Buffett's wisdom:
Link to video -
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 00:50 last edited by
What the hell does he know about markets?
-
wrote on 7 Mar 2025, 00:53 last edited by
It's just interesting that Shapiro is sharing it. I think most reasonable Trump supporters were hoping the tariff stuff was on the less serious side of his campaign rhetoric. Ben said as much in his debate with Sam Harris.
-
It's just interesting that Shapiro is sharing it. I think most reasonable Trump supporters were hoping the tariff stuff was on the less serious side of his campaign rhetoric. Ben said as much in his debate with Sam Harris.
-
. I think most reasonable Trump supporters were hoping the tariff stuff was on the less serious side of his campaign rhetoric.
I sense some buyer’s remorse in that statement.