A different perspective...
-
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 16:10 last edited by
It’s pretty simple. The Federal budget needs to be set at a percentage of GDP. Any deficit spending requires equivalent cuts elsewhere OR congressional approval.
-
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 16:15 last edited by
Medicare physician reimbursement has not kept up with inflation in more than 20 years. What does line 2 propose to do?
-
Good, interesting article. It underscores that the war on federal employees (of which there are many doing great jobs, but also many doing jack shit) doesn't really have an impact. I loved the phrase "the federal government is just a medical insurance company with an army".
Here's the chart in the article btw. Not sure how this would impact individuals, but it's a roadmap of sorts. What they really need to do is pass a 20-year plan to reduce spending, deficit, and debt. Minimize impact but get on a trajectory for fiscal health.
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 16:17 last edited by Doctor Phibes@89th said in A different perspective...:
there are many doing great jobs, but also many doing jack shit
That's Congressman Jack Shit to you!
-
Medicare physician reimbursement has not kept up with inflation in more than 20 years. What does line 2 propose to do?
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 19:48 last edited by@George-K said in A different perspective...:
Medicare physician reimbursement has not kept up with inflation in more than 20 years. What does line 2 propose to do?
Let veterinarians start treating people
-
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 19:50 last edited by
"Pay corporate taxes in stock"?
Great opportunity for shenanigans!
-
It’s pretty simple. The Federal budget needs to be set at a percentage of GDP. Any deficit spending requires equivalent cuts elsewhere OR congressional approval.
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 19:53 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in A different perspective...:
The Federal budget needs to be set at a percentage of GDP.
There goes Keynesian economics and the nearly century of stability and prosperity that come with it.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in A different perspective...:
The Federal budget needs to be set at a percentage of GDP.
There goes Keynesian economics and the nearly century of stability and prosperity that come with it.
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 22:10 last edited by@Axtremus said in A different perspective...:
@LuFins-Dad said in A different perspective...:
The Federal budget needs to be set at a percentage of GDP.
There goes Keynesian economics and the nearly century of stability and prosperity that come with it.
Forgot about the deficit?
-
wrote on 29 Jan 2025, 22:32 last edited by
@Axtremus said in A different perspective...:
"Pay corporate taxes in stock"?
Great opportunity for shenanigans!
Yeah, I’d put my money on that stock no matter on what bourse it trades.
-
Good, interesting article. It underscores that the war on federal employees (of which there are many doing great jobs, but also many doing jack shit) doesn't really have an impact. I loved the phrase "the federal government is just a medical insurance company with an army".
Here's the chart in the article btw. Not sure how this would impact individuals, but it's a roadmap of sorts. What they really need to do is pass a 20-year plan to reduce spending, deficit, and debt. Minimize impact but get on a trajectory for fiscal health.
wrote on 30 Jan 2025, 16:44 last edited by@89th said in A different perspective...:
What they really need to do is pass a 20-year plan to reduce spending, deficit, and debt.
For me, the problem is that most most of the politicians do not want to take a long term viewpoint. They are too worried about the next election. So, while the above makes sense, hard to get them to do it.
-
@89th said in A different perspective...:
What they really need to do is pass a 20-year plan to reduce spending, deficit, and debt.
For me, the problem is that most most of the politicians do not want to take a long term viewpoint. They are too worried about the next election. So, while the above makes sense, hard to get them to do it.
wrote on 30 Jan 2025, 16:49 last edited by@taiwan_girl Exactly, the blessing and curse of short terms. This is where I would hope Trump would step up and say "here is a 12 year plan to get our financials in order" (yes that takes it through two terms for Vance).