Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. RTO. Different office?

RTO. Different office?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
34 Posts 9 Posters 422 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    In my own experience, I've found that if you offer incentives, the people who typically quit first are the employees who can most readily find work elsewhere. IOW, the best ones.

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 Offline
      89th8 Offline
      89th
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Based on my time in federal agencies, and stories from my wife and my friends, if the goal was to cut costs via reducing the workforce, the real solution (although brutal) to be effective would to empower (maybe even incentivize) agency leadership to reduce their workforce by 20% allowing them to fire anyone they want for any reason. Most people in a job can look around and see people who are absolutely not adding any value and are just filling a billet, a seat.... that's the bloat that needs to go.

      Asking folks to return to the office (which costs the taxpayers more) or asking folks to retire early and get 8 months of free pay (also costing the taxpayers more) where most of those people will just switch to the contractor world (also costing the taxpayers more) is an approach for campaign marketing, but doesn't address the issue of reducing costs or workers adding no value.

      AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        NobodySock
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        just now realizing my retirement date has been wayyyy moved up!

        AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Aren't you glad you voted for Trump?

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 89th

            Based on my time in federal agencies, and stories from my wife and my friends, if the goal was to cut costs via reducing the workforce, the real solution (although brutal) to be effective would to empower (maybe even incentivize) agency leadership to reduce their workforce by 20% allowing them to fire anyone they want for any reason. Most people in a job can look around and see people who are absolutely not adding any value and are just filling a billet, a seat.... that's the bloat that needs to go.

            Asking folks to return to the office (which costs the taxpayers more) or asking folks to retire early and get 8 months of free pay (also costing the taxpayers more) where most of those people will just switch to the contractor world (also costing the taxpayers more) is an approach for campaign marketing, but doesn't address the issue of reducing costs or workers adding no value.

            AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            @89th said in RTO. Different office?:

            Asking folks to return to the office ... doesn't address the issue of reducing costs or workers adding no value.

            Gotta wonder what the private sector corporate bosses are thinking as more and more of them are hopping onto the RTO train.

            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
            • N NobodySock

              just now realizing my retirement date has been wayyyy moved up!

              AxtremusA Offline
              AxtremusA Offline
              Axtremus
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              @NobodySock said in RTO. Different office?:

              just now realizing my retirement date has been wayyyy moved up!

              Let us know when it's time to congratulate you! 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                NobodySock
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                well by wayyyy up, it is really only 3 months. But technically speaking, I would be done with work on Feb 6. This is alot to grasp right now and will wait a few days before responding to the offer as more details are fleshed out. This is really weird to think this may be my last pay period of 40 years work.

                jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Yeah that is crazy, but congrats!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  👍
                  • AxtremusA Axtremus

                    @89th said in RTO. Different office?:

                    Asking folks to return to the office ... doesn't address the issue of reducing costs or workers adding no value.

                    Gotta wonder what the private sector corporate bosses are thinking as more and more of them are hopping onto the RTO train.

                    89th8 Offline
                    89th8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    @Axtremus said in RTO. Different office?:

                    @89th said in RTO. Different office?:

                    Asking folks to return to the office ... doesn't address the issue of reducing costs or workers adding no value.

                    Gotta wonder what the private sector corporate bosses are thinking as more and more of them are hopping onto the RTO train.

                    Not sure. It saves the private company money to have remote workers, so I'd imagine they won't change as much. Again, Trump's RTO is literally costing the taxpayer more, it's the opposite of saving costs.

                    taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Trump also said in his speech tonight that he wants federal workers to return to the office like the rest of Americans who have to work in an office. Of course, don't let the fact that 14% of the country (three years ago) work remotely, approximately 32 million adults in the US work remotely as of this year. What is funny is 14% of the federal government works remotely as of Dec 2024... so what Trump said doesn't add up at all, but who cares. @George-K are we at 30,573 yet?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • N NobodySock

                        well by wayyyy up, it is really only 3 months. But technically speaking, I would be done with work on Feb 6. This is alot to grasp right now and will wait a few days before responding to the offer as more details are fleshed out. This is really weird to think this may be my last pay period of 40 years work.

                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        @NobodySock said in RTO. Different office?:

                        well by wayyyy up, it is really only 3 months. But technically speaking, I would be done with work on Feb 6. This is alot to grasp right now and will wait a few days before responding to the offer as more details are fleshed out. This is really weird to think this may be my last pay period of 40 years work.

                        Be careful. There doesn’t seem to be any legal basis for the 8 month pay.

                        Also, is it really 8 months? Or is it ‘through September’? Reporting has been unclear about that. September would make sense for Trump/Musk because (as you surely know) that’s the end of the fiscal year so their first full year would be lighter.

                        I get that this week ‘8 months’ and ‘through September’ are the same thing but if one needed to stick around a bit to train someone in their duties it could start to make a difference.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        👍
                        • 89th8 89th

                          @Axtremus said in RTO. Different office?:

                          @89th said in RTO. Different office?:

                          Asking folks to return to the office ... doesn't address the issue of reducing costs or workers adding no value.

                          Gotta wonder what the private sector corporate bosses are thinking as more and more of them are hopping onto the RTO train.

                          Not sure. It saves the private company money to have remote workers, so I'd imagine they won't change as much. Again, Trump's RTO is literally costing the taxpayer more, it's the opposite of saving costs.

                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                          taiwan_girl
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          @89th said in RTO. Different office?:

                          Again, Trump's RTO is literally costing the taxpayer more, it's the opposite of saving costs.

                          I disagree a bit. People in the office go out to lunch, drive, take public transport, etc. Their purchases and the taxes help (probably more locally), but especially in a place like Wash DC.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            You know…I completely get that many jobs/situations/individuals can perform equal or better working from home, but study after study keeps suggesting that on the whole, working in a centralized office leads to higher output and more productivity. That’s why so many private companies are going back to in-office. Forget the government… Amazon, Google, Apple, Salesforce, Zoom (how funny is that?), Blackrock, CitiGroup, Goldman Sachs, Disney, and on and on… All are insisting their employees return to the office…

                            And give it one contract, and I suspect Government Contractors are going to be facing a similar dilemma…

                            And none of those have the accountability and oversight issues that Federal Employees have…

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              @NobodySock said in RTO. Different office?:

                              well by wayyyy up, it is really only 3 months. But technically speaking, I would be done with work on Feb 6. This is alot to grasp right now and will wait a few days before responding to the offer as more details are fleshed out. This is really weird to think this may be my last pay period of 40 years work.

                              Be careful. There doesn’t seem to be any legal basis for the 8 month pay.

                              Also, is it really 8 months? Or is it ‘through September’? Reporting has been unclear about that. September would make sense for Trump/Musk because (as you surely know) that’s the end of the fiscal year so their first full year would be lighter.

                              I get that this week ‘8 months’ and ‘through September’ are the same thing but if one needed to stick around a bit to train someone in their duties it could start to make a difference.

                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nycJ Offline
                              jon-nyc
                              wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                              #19

                              @jon-nyc said in RTO. Different office?:

                              @NobodySock said in RTO. Different office?:

                              well by wayyyy up, it is really only 3 months. But technically speaking, I would be done with work on Feb 6. This is alot to grasp right now and will wait a few days before responding to the offer as more details are fleshed out. This is really weird to think this may be my last pay period of 40 years work.

                              Be careful. There doesn’t seem to be any legal basis for the 8 month pay.

                              Also, is it really 8 months? Or is it ‘through September’? Reporting has been unclear about that. September would make sense for Trump/Musk because (as you surely know) that’s the end of the fiscal year so their first full year would be lighter.

                              I get that this week ‘8 months’ and ‘through September’ are the same thing but if one needed to stick around a bit to train someone in their duties it could start to make a difference.

                              Also has anyone checked the fine print (if there is any) to see if this overrides any normal retirement benes? I don't mean pension, of course, but, say, being paid out unused vacation or whatever.

                              IOW they could be giving with one hand and taking away with the other, even unintentionally because this was surely rushed.

                              Only non-witches get due process.

                              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • 89th8 Offline
                                89th8 Offline
                                89th
                                wrote on last edited by 89th
                                #20

                                Just got back from a business trip to DC. Talked to a few friends who are federal staff (Dept of Labor, Dept of Homeland Security, etc)... the first two I talked to said they bring a book to work and about half the workforce just sits in a conference room or hallway and reads since there aren't enough computers or workstations or internet bandwidth for everyone. They said they could easily log-in from home and do their job, but since they aren't allowed they just sit for 2-3 days each week and read a novel. I'll think of this as I pay my taxes soon!

                                Doctor PhibesD taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
                                • 89th8 89th

                                  Just got back from a business trip to DC. Talked to a few friends who are federal staff (Dept of Labor, Dept of Homeland Security, etc)... the first two I talked to said they bring a book to work and about half the workforce just sits in a conference room or hallway and reads since there aren't enough computers or workstations or internet bandwidth for everyone. They said they could easily log-in from home and do their job, but since they aren't allowed they just sit for 2-3 days each week and read a novel. I'll think of this as I pay my taxes soon!

                                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                                  Doctor PhibesD Online
                                  Doctor Phibes
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  @89th said in RTO. Different office?:

                                  Just got back from a business trip to DC. Talked to a few friends who are federal staff (Dept of Labor, Dept of Homeland Security, etc)... the first two I talked to said they bring a book to work and about half the workforce just sits in a conference room or hallway and reads since there aren't enough computers or workstations or internet bandwidth for everyone. They said they could easily log-in from home and do their job, but since they aren't allowed they just sit for 2-3 days each week and read a novel. I'll think of this as I pay my taxes soon!

                                  How are they going to be able to answer Elon's email if they don't have internet access?????

                                  I was only joking

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • 89th8 Offline
                                    89th8 Offline
                                    89th
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    Ha, that's a great question. None of that is exaggerated above btw. Even on my own team, there are two federal staffers, one of which is a guy who has been on the job 6 months. Newly married, just landed this job... really would be a shame if he's fired despite the legitimacy of his duties.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                      #23

                                      How has he not been fired already? Aren’t they getting rid of all new employees?

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • 89th8 Offline
                                        89th8 Offline
                                        89th
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        Most probational employees (aka less than 1 year) I think are at risk. Not sure why he hasn't been fired yet.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          NobodySock
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          To update some questions here, The Fork in the Road promise to those who submit their intention to resign, includes all benefits as if one was still working actively. Time served, annual/sick leave accrual, etc. And yes, it is no longer 8 months, it is how ever long it will be from the day my agency informs me I am now on administrative leave until September 30th. I am still working. I am sure all agencies are scrambling to make sense out of all of this. And yeah, they just chopped off the head of the probationary employees as obviously that has the least bite back. So we received a new email from Elon's son over the weekend. It asked us to reply with 5 tasks that one accomplished during the last work week. It was to be sent back to them with a copy to one's supervisor. My agency quickly put out an email to all directing us to NOT reply to this email yet. I was a little bit surprised that I received this email as I am one of the 75,000 who took the offer, so one would think that those folks should have been omitted from this email. Oh well. Neither here nor there, but I am hearing and feeling the pain of 2 million federal colleagues who are living in fear for their future right now, as I am a member of a couple FB federal employee groups. They all feel victim to this chainsaw when more prudent methods could have been more methodical and approached with professionalism and real intent to save the government money instead of seeing it today for what it is. Retribution. Trump and Republicans have always hated the federal workforce. They are part of the deep state you know?

                                          89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups