Ma’am you ordered a Lyft. Not a forklift.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 13:44 last edited by
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 13:50 last edited by
Did she order Lyft XL?
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 14:02 last edited by LuFins Dad
I bet if she was a fat white woman, they would have found a way for her to fit.
Edit to add, why the hell did autocorrect turn woman into EOMAN?
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 14:27 last edited by
@89th said in Ma’am you ordered a Lyft. Not a forklift.:
@George-K said in Ma’am you ordered a Lyft. Not a forklift.:
She is uber fat
LOL!
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 14:48 last edited by
This is the "victim."
Link to video -
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 14:52 last edited by
In seriousness, public transport methods should have the ability to accommodate disabilities, but without the unnecessary expense of making every car that way. Like hotels have some accessible rooms but not all are accessible.
Someone with her disability (or a wheelchair) should be able to order a taxi especially designed to accommodate her, but not expect that any such taxi should do so.
Maybe there’s a box to check and maybe the wait is a bit longer.
That seems to be the reasonable compromise that we’ve worked out in other areas (such as NYC Taxis)
-
This is the "victim."
Link to videowrote on 28 Jan 2025, 15:06 last edited by@George-K said in Ma’am you ordered a Lyft. Not a forklift.:
This is the "victim."
Link to videoWide angle lens?
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 15:22 last edited by
@89th >uber fat
555
-
wrote on 31 Jan 2025, 17:05 last edited by
-
wrote on 31 Jan 2025, 17:11 last edited by
-
wrote on 31 Jan 2025, 17:17 last edited by
So brave!
-
wrote on 31 Jan 2025, 17:23 last edited by
-
wrote on 31 Jan 2025, 18:56 last edited by