When you lose the WSJ
-
wrote on 22 Jan 2025, 16:33 last edited by
-
wrote on 22 Jan 2025, 16:36 last edited by
I haven't denounced him for this action and neither have any of the rank and file Republicans in my neighborhood. I'm sure if one searches hard enough, you will find Republican's views pretty scattered on the action.
-
wrote on 22 Jan 2025, 16:46 last edited by
Only when Trump loses Jolly, will he need fear that he has gone astray.
-
wrote on 22 Jan 2025, 16:52 last edited by
I would have preferred that the J6 pardons were more discriminate. The only discrimination involved was between commutation and pardon. I was expecting some people to stay in jail.
-
wrote on 22 Jan 2025, 16:56 last edited by
@kluurs said in When you lose the WSJ:
Only when Trump loses Jolly, will he need fear that he has gone astray.
Lad, I'm from the land of Huey P. Long. When political factions start carrying submachine guns openly, while patrolling the streets, will I be truly worried.
Most of the media is sound and fury, signifying little.
-
I would have preferred that the J6 pardons were more discriminate. The only discrimination involved was between commutation and pardon. I was expecting some people to stay in jail.
wrote on 22 Jan 2025, 18:46 last edited by@Horace said in When you lose the WSJ:
I would have preferred that the J6 pardons were more discriminate. The only discrimination involved was between commutation and pardon. I was expecting some people to stay in jail.
Agreed.
There's a relatively clear line between leading the charge, assaulting officers, breaking and entering, stealing, and conspiracy to stop the election.... and those who were there for the protest and followed the mob through already-opened doors...aka trespassing or unauthorized entry. The latter shouldn't have been charged in the first place, and pardons would make sense there. But not for the clear criminals.