What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha
-
Yeah, I get it. Trump is a vain, boorish, arrogant SOB.
In my opinion, he really is.
But, how unhinged is this reporting?
"Trump rejected the idea because he feared his hair would become disheveled in the rain..."
And you said that with a straight face. Did the Atlantic's "anonymous" sources say that, or did they just make it up? My guess is the latter.
He's an obnoxious prick, as I said. But if you're going to make ridiculous statements like that, back them up, preferably with names.
BTW: Did the Atlantic report on the next day's ceremonies (too lazy to look it up)?
@George-K said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
Yeah, I get it. Trump is a vain, boorish, arrogant SOB.
In my opinion, he really is.
But, how unhinged is this reporting?
"Trump rejected the idea because he feared his hair would become disheveled in the rain..."
And you said that with a straight face. Did the Atlantic's "anonymous" sources say that, or did they just make it up? My guess is the latter.
He's an obnoxious prick, as I said. But if you're going to make ridiculous statements like that, back them up, preferably with names.
BTW: Did the Atlantic report on the next day's ceremonies (too lazy to look it up)?
We will stipulate his faults. But I think what Atlantic et al does is much worse.
-
Turley comments:
"The real story this week is not whether Trump or The Atlantic are lying but why either possibility is viewed as equally plausible. The public is left with an incredible tale told by two equally noncredible sources. That is the real story — and a truly sad one."
Yeah....
"Two equally non credible sources..."
Many here will say that Trump lies. Will they have the same opinion of Goldberg and The Atlantic?
@George-K said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
Turley comments:
"The real story this week is not whether Trump or The Atlantic are lying but why either possibility is viewed as equally plausible. The public is left with an incredible tale told by two equally noncredible sources. That is the real story — and a truly sad one."
Yeah....
"Two equally non credible sources..."
Many here will say that Trump lies. Will they have the same opinion of Goldberg and The Atlantic?
You made the point i was trying to make in my last post, but more eloquently. Since I’ve had considerable wine tonight That could be expected.
-
@George-K said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
Turley comments:
"The real story this week is not whether Trump or The Atlantic are lying but why either possibility is viewed as equally plausible. The public is left with an incredible tale told by two equally noncredible sources. That is the real story — and a truly sad one."
Yeah....
"Two equally non credible sources..."
Many here will say that Trump lies. Will they have the same opinion of Goldberg and The Atlantic?
You made the point i was trying to make in my last post, but more eloquently. Since I’ve had considerable wine tonight That could be expected.
@Mik said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
I’ve had considerable wine tonight
You say that as if it's a bad thing...
But, to return to the thread.
Based on the emails, it's obvious that The Atlantic has lied. If you're going to apply the "lie" standard to Trump, apply it to The Atlantic.
-
Again, look at his actions. Does he seem like a president who doesn't respect our veterans? I can't see it. I don't think it is conceivable that he said, it, which is the essence of this thread.
Look, the guy's an ass in many ways. But not this one.
@Mik said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
Again, look at his actions. Does he seem like a president who doesn't respect our veterans? I can't see it.
“He’s not a war hero. He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren’t captured.”
—Trump at a Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Iowa@Mik what are your thoughts on the above quote?
-
Aqua, that was a quote about one man who was constantly slagging him.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
@Mik said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
Aqua, that was a quote about one man who was constantly slagging him.
Seems like he was referring to anyone who was captured in war.
-
@Mik said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
Aqua, that was a quote about one man who was constantly slagging him.
So you think that quote isn't a valid reason for concern regarding whether or not Trump respects veterans. Why is what he said about McCain okay?
-
I'm not Mik, but my answer would be that it was a not ok thing to say and Trump would be a better President if he didn't say that stuff. But you might note that the observation was in the form of a joke. "Why should I respect POWs? Why shouldn't I respect the ones who didn't get captured?". That sounds a lot like the observation of an edgelord open mic stand up comic. If you want to understand the character of the man who said it, that was the part of his character talking IMO.
Education is extremely important.
-
Aqua. I am more disturbed by a media that is making up the truth because they think it is good for me than a Boris Yeltsin type President. The MSM rarely makes contact with reality any more, it presents its idealized view of what life should look like. Very dystopian and autocratic.
-
I'm not Mik, but my answer would be that it was a not ok thing to say and Trump would be a better President if he didn't say that stuff. But you might note that the observation was in the form of a joke. "Why should I respect POWs? Why shouldn't I respect the ones who didn't get captured?". That sounds a lot like the observation of an edgelord open mic stand up comic. If you want to understand the character of the man who said it, that was the part of his character talking IMO.
@Horace said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
my answer would be that it was a not ok thing to say and Trump would be a better President if he didn't say that stuff.
That's my only point. He's not Stalin for saying things like that; that's liberal TDS. Conservative TDS is defending it. So let's just call it a fucked up thing to say and leave it at that.
-
That seems to be the default response with President Trump
Pick one:
"That is just President Trump being President Trump"
"He was joking"
"It was taken out of contacts"
"He didn't mean what he said/he didn't mean what was reported"
"He may speak incorrectly but he means well"
"He is treated unfairly by the public/news"
"It's not really a big deal. You have to look past what he says"I DO think that President Trump is treated unfairly compared to recent past president, but I also think that he brings some of it (maybe alot) on himself.
And I do think he would be/could be much better if he acted more "presidential". (Sorry to those who like President Trump, but I dont think the way he acts makes him a better President. President Trump being President Trump is not an upgrade to me. LOL)
-
Let's go back to when McCain was alive. The man was a royal pain in the ass, and was one of the main reasons the republicans couldn't get their shit together and stand up to the democrats. Republicans were to the point of openly hoping he would lose his next election. A commonly expressed sentiment was "I'd call him an ass hole but he's a war hero so I'll sit on my thumbs", in so many words.
The only reason most republicans didn't say it openly was because they didn't want to be "politically incorrect". One of the very reasons Trump is now and was then the man needed for the job was precisely because he wont be politically correct just to make you feel better. McCain was a sorry assed jerk who was constantly a turd in the republican punchbowl, and Trump said what 90% of republicans were thinking but didnt dare say. He says what needs saying, and if you dont like it well fuck you. I like that.
-
Let's go back to when McCain was alive. The man was a royal pain in the ass, and was one of the main reasons the republicans couldn't get their shit together and stand up to the democrats. Republicans were to the point of openly hoping he would lose his next election. A commonly expressed sentiment was "I'd call him an ass hole but he's a war hero so I'll sit on my thumbs", in so many words.
The only reason most republicans didn't say it openly was because they didn't want to be "politically incorrect". One of the very reasons Trump is now and was then the man needed for the job was precisely because he wont be politically correct just to make you feel better. McCain was a sorry assed jerk who was constantly a turd in the republican punchbowl, and Trump said what 90% of republicans were thinking but didnt dare say. He says what needs saying, and if you dont like it well fuck you. I like that.
@Larry said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
Let's go back to when McCain was alive. The man was a royal pain in the ass, and was one of the main reasons the republicans couldn't get their shit together and stand up to the democrats. Republicans were to the point of openly hoping he would lose his next election. A commonly expressed sentiment was "I'd call him an ass hole but he's a war hero so I'll sit on my thumbs", in so many words.
The only reason most republicans didn't say it openly was because they didn't want to be "politically incorrect". One of the very reasons Trump is now and was then the man needed for the job was precisely because he wont be politically correct just to make you feel better. McCain was a sorry assed jerk who was constantly a turd in the republican punchbowl, and Trump said what 90% of republicans were thinking but didnt dare say. He says what needs saying, and if you dont like it well fuck you. I like that.
You are such a pain in the ass bringing up context. The argument was nearly won.
-
But he didn't call him an asshole, despite his military record. That's exactly what he should have done. Instead, he criticized his military record, specifically his being a POW, which has nothing to do with his politics.
@Loki So you think then that it's okay to insult a former POW for being a POW because he's politically a royal pain in the ass? Context makes it okay to confuse a military record with politics?
-
But he didn't call him an asshole, despite his military record. That's exactly what he should have done. Instead, he criticized his military record, specifically his being a POW, which has nothing to do with his politics.
@Loki So you think then that it's okay to insult a former POW for being a POW because he's politically a royal pain in the ass? Context makes it okay to confuse a military record with politics?
@Aqua-Letifer said in What bothers me about the trump veterans brouhaha:
But he didn't call him an asshole, despite his military record. That's exactly what he should have done. Instead, he criticized his military record, specifically his being a POW, which has nothing to do with his politics.
@Loki So you think then that it's okay to insult a former POW for being a POW because he's politically a royal pain in the ass? Context makes it okay to confuse a military record with politics?
Never. It was really fvcked up on Trump’s part. Trump however is pretty transparent who he is and is almost always a counterpuncher. The MSM is the most transactional bunch of the ends justify the means and I can’t believe have given up a lifetime of trust building, but worse try to trick people into believing lies and justifying those lies. Every lie is a debt to the future.
-
This is how every Trump pig pile works. The current issue is about a claim that Trump called veterans losers and refused to visit a war memorial in France because he thought they were losers. Then those who were there in the room say it never happened, including one guy who wrote a book trashing Trump. The canceled trip was said to be about the weather. Having lost the argument over what he did or didn't say, the trashing turned to how he's lying about the weather. Then it was proven using documentation that it WAS canceled due to weather. Now the claim about what he said is shown to be a lie, the claim that weather was just an excuse is shown to be a lie, so to keep the whole thing going it becomes "yeah, but it sounds like something he would say, just look at what he said about McCain!" Just don't bother to put what he said about McCain in context, because "Orange man bad" and once you tear down that bit of out of context bull shit the Trump bashers will just deflect to some other way of feeding their mindless hate.
Damn.
