Pritzker starts setting up for 2028
-
wrote on 11 Nov 2024, 02:24 last edited by
Um…Frank Calabrese is a political commentator?? Not part of The Outfit?
-
wrote on 17 Nov 2024, 23:17 last edited by
-
wrote on 21 Nov 2024, 15:34 last edited by
-
wrote on 21 Nov 2024, 15:40 last edited by
There's the cosplay LD was referring to. At this time, mere fantasies of cosplay, but let's see where it goes.
-
-
wrote on 21 Nov 2024, 16:02 last edited by
I can't see Pritzker getting very far. He's just not that cuddly, engaging or smart. His policies are too conventionally Democratic.
-
wrote on 21 Nov 2024, 20:47 last edited by
@George-K said in Pritzker starts setting up for 2028:
A comment on X:
"Conspiracy to violate immigration laws—particularly 8 USC §1324, harboring illegal aliens--is a Federal felony good for 10 years.
I hope AG Gaetz is taking notes on these public confessions."
Isn’t that a literal and actual insurrection?
-
@George-K said in Pritzker starts setting up for 2028:
A comment on X:
"Conspiracy to violate immigration laws—particularly 8 USC §1324, harboring illegal aliens--is a Federal felony good for 10 years.
I hope AG Gaetz is taking notes on these public confessions."
Isn’t that a literal and actual insurrection?
wrote on 21 Nov 2024, 21:30 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Pritzker starts setting up for 2028:
@George-K said in Pritzker starts setting up for 2028:
A comment on X:
"Conspiracy to violate immigration laws—particularly 8 USC §1324, harboring illegal aliens--is a Federal felony good for 10 years.
I hope AG Gaetz is taking notes on these public confessions."
Isn’t that a literal and actual insurrection?
Yes.
-
wrote on 21 Nov 2024, 21:48 last edited by
This is good training for those of us who can't imagine not taking a politician seriously. Observe yourself in how you react to this politician's words, and try to figure out how you're managing to not take him seriously, in his literal threat to take up arms against the federal government.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
Pritzker surprised many by not raising taxes and even reining in some spending, including nixing a health-care program for undocumented adult aliens.
“We have to live within our means. If you come to the table looking to spend more — I’m going to ask you where you want to cut,” Pritzker lectured the liberal legislature. “Economic growth is an essential ingredient that allows us to move beyond a challenging budget year like this one.”
Democrats sat on their hands when they heard that part of Pritzker’s speech. But other observers cheered his new pragmatism. “A budget free at last from tax increases should begin to send a message to job creators that the state’s leaders understand they’re in a competition with other states for business investment,” wrote the Chicago Tribune.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
That Tweet makes it look as though he's called Colorado Mike Johnston. And who wouldn't vote for somebody called Colorado Mike?
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by Horace
Trump's lasting impact will be to have made the Democrats a better party with better ideas. There really is nothing he can't do.
-
wrote 17 days ago last edited by
I’ve considered his legacy might just be to make the Democrats better while making the Republicans worse.
-
wrote 2 days ago last edited by
Maybe not Gov. Pritzker, but another Illinois (dont pronounce the s, right @George-K ) person is looking for the President.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/03/12/rahm-emmanuel-president-2028-column-00224241
The biggest Rahm-may-run tell, though, is that he’s already road-testing the first outlines of a stump speech, or at least an issue he can make his own.
I caught it last month when he came to Washington to appear before a conference held by Democracy Forward, a liberal group helping to lead litigation efforts against the Trump administration.
“I am done with the discussion of locker rooms, I am done with the discussion of bathrooms and we better start having a conversation about the classroom,” Emanuel said, drawing applause as he alluded to a new study showing more than two-thirds of eighth graders can’t read at grade level.
He kept coming back to the study and eventually and explicitly tied the policy to the politics, in Rahm’ian fashion.
“We can lead a discussion and force a topic onto the agenda of this country that’s worthy of having a debate about,” Emanuel said about the dismal student data. Unlike, say, the fate of a heretofore obscure federal agency, whose demise dominated elite coverage in the first weeks of Trump’s presidency. “The New York Times put crumbs all the way to the front door of the USAID headquarters and we just walked along back there,” he lamented of his party.
and
David Axelrod, a longtime friend of Rahm, has also warmed to the idea. “Who has more relevant experience?” Axelrod asked, adding that Emanuel has two other alluring assets for his party right now. “He understands how to win and speaks bluntly in an idiom that most folks understand.”
-
wrote 2 days ago last edited by
I've heard him on right-leaning podcasts, thinking and speaking reasonably, and taking the right-leaning concerns seriously, as if adults might have them. This is the template that the left has been unable to muster, but now a bunch of their politicians are adopting it. It was never that fucking hard, but here we are.
-
wrote 2 days ago last edited by
And it was never sincere.
-
T taiwan_girl referenced this topic a day ago
