Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:
Did he talk about buying Mexico?
No, but he floated ditching the income tax for tariffs...Talked a good bit about McKinley and the U.S. in the late1800's.
Should be at about the 40 minute mark or therabouts.
-
-
@xenon said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:
Boring interview. It’s not a good format for Trump. He can be entertaining in rallies - but he didn’t say anything interesting or funny. Not much depth here.
No, there's not a lot of funny. And in typical Trump fashion, there's a lot of self back-patting. Sometimes, Muhammad Ali level. But if you don't think there weren't interesting policy points being discussed, you're a moron or seriously suffering from TDS.
-
This is what I mean by no depth. Joe says - lay out the case for stolen election and he lets out a word salad of Kamalian proportions. He’s had 4 years to get his talk track and evidence together on this. He said he’d come back with a stack of papers.
https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/s/zANcycnn69
As someone says in the comments, it’s
like the kid that he says he has a signed Babe Ruth card… he’ll bring it to school next week… you won’t believe it. -
I did listen to the entire interview. Joe is on my regular podcast rotation, I listen to a lot of his interviews.
Trump talks in generalities, Joe is a well-read or well-conversed dude. It’s a conversation between Trump and Joe, but Joe was usually the one with substantive or interesting examples on most topics.
-
I listened to the whole interview - long drive to the race today helped clear out most of it. I thought it was a win for Trump. Rogan is friendly territory - and it was a conversation with no hardball questions - but at the same time, I thought Trump came across more reasoned as he felt like he was on comfortable turf. He employed some Bill Clinton tools - giving specific (likely contrived) statistics - but said in a way that comes across as credible. Anyone who only heard that this man was a maniac and the next Hitler for the world would walk away feeling a bit safer voting for him. Most importantly, he made no noticeable big errors. Overall, I think the timing and performance could help Trump with anyone still vaciliating.
-
I listened to about the first 45 minutes.
So far, not too much substance, and a lot of self-aggrandizement coming through. However, he seemed approachable, friendly, and not too "Trumpy." I stopped listening when he talked about CBS (my chili needed tending to). More tomorrow.
-
I loved how Trump was telling stories about basic Lincoln family history in the beginning, but acting like he was dropping some insider American lore. Even Joe had to say after a few mins “everyone knows this stuff, I want to know what you felt in the WH…”
But to your point, George - I think Rogan made a smart move doing a very pro-Trump opener (“the system / media is out to get you”). Trump is his Trumpiest when he’s lashing out at something / someone - but that doesn’t work as well when you’re in friendly territory.
I didn’t find anything interesting or novel in there. Even with 3 hours of content - I didn’t learn anything about Trump or his positions that I didn’t already know.
-
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
20 hours/20M
Yang tells Kamala, "Go".
https://nypost.com/2024/10/26/us-news/trumps-rogan-episode-hits-20m-views-in-20-hours-on-youtube/
-
Those "view counts."
I have to wonder how many of them listened to the whole thing. I've only done about 35 minutes, but I'm sure I'm in that statistic of 20 million.
Yang's right, however. If you have 8% of the population listening in, even if for a few minutes, that's a market you MUST tap.
But...then there's the prickly question of reviewed subjects.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@Jolly said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:
I learned he knew more about boxing than I thought.
Yeah, I thought that while some might review that as irrelevant, I thought Trump's depth of knowledge and fervor for MMA supported the notion that Trump represents the common man - i.e. not part of the elite.
-
@George-K said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:
Those "view counts."
I have to wonder how many of them listened to the whole thing. I've only done about 35 minutes, but I'm sure I'm in that statistic of 20 million.
Yang's right, however. If you have 8% of the population listening in, even if for a few minutes, that's a market you MUST tap.
But...then there's the prickly question of reviewed subjects.
It's YouTube. But the real platform is Spotify. As a podcast, the international standard is number of "downloads," which is defined as one minute or more of streaming.
Stream time's the real metric anyway, but it's of course not public.
-
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@George-K said in Unlisted. 750,000 views in 60 minutes:
Yeah. You watch one minute, and it counts.
I watched about 45 minutes (and fell asleep). How does that count.
It counts as:
- 1 download
- 45 minutes added to the show's total view time
- 45 minutes of view time within the buckets of the first 7 (and 30) days
- ???? more or fewer minutes as of X minutes past publish, compared to the channel average
- the top ???? performing episode for the channel, ranked by unique downloads
There isn't one single metric.
