Travesty
-
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6894721-Petition-Filed.html
During an interview, Powell asked why the defense, neither she nor Flynn's previous attorneys were given access to the damning Kislyak phone call with Flynn. The fact that the defense is not given access to evidence that may prove exculpatory is grounds for dismissal.
-
Appeals court: "OK, we'll listen to your objections"
A federal appeals court Thursday has agreed to hear a request from Michael Flynn's legal team to remove the district judge overseeing his case, and has also ordered the judge to explain his controversial and unorthodox conduct in handling it.
Judge Emmett Sullivan has been given a June 1 deadline to respond. The government has also been invited to "respond in its discretion" during that window.
Flynn's legal team had filed a request on Tuesday asking the appeals court to remove Judge Emmett Sullivan from the case, claiming the judge was biased against the defendant. Following the Justice Department's request earlier this month to dismiss the case against Flynn, Sullivan had appointed retired federal Judge John Gleeson to file an amicus curiae brief arguing in favor of not dropping the case against the general.
-
FBI Director Wray opens internal review into how bureau handled Michael Flynn case
Insight from Fox News contributor Mollie Hemingway, senior editor at The Federalist, and Fred Fleitz, former CIA analyst and former NSC chief of staff.
The FBI announced Friday that Director Chris Wray has ordered an internal review of the handling of the bureau’s investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, which will include examining whether current FBI employees "engaged in misconduct."
“FBI Director Christopher Wray today ordered the Bureau’s Inspection Division to conduct an after-action review of the Michael Flynn investigation,” the bureau said in a statement.
The review will be handled by the bureau’s Inspection Division, the FBI said. That division is similar to an internal affairs office in a police department.
The bureau said the “after-action review” will have a two-fold purpose: evaluating the FBI’s role in the case and determining whether any “current employees engaged in misconduct,” as well as identifying whether any “improvements” might be warranted to FBI procedures.
“Although the FBI does not have the prosecutorial authority to bring a criminal case, the Inspection Division can and will evaluate whether any current onboard employees engaged in actions that might warrant disciplinary measures,” the FBI said.
-
Booting Sullivan?
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6894721-Petition-Filed.html
As you may have heard, the Appellate Court ordered (yes, ordered) Sullivan to respond to why they should not issue a writ of mandamus in the matter.
Sullivan has lawyered up.
Is this even allowed? A higher court asks a lower court to explain their thinking and the lower court hires outside counsel? Really?
-
Highly unusual doesn't even begin to cover it.
-
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/29/trump-flynn-russia-ambassador-289905
Flynn urged Russian ambassador to take 'reciprocal' actions, transcripts show
Flynn’s conversations with the ambassador were a key concern to FBI investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Incoming national security adviser Michael Flynn told Russia’s ambassador to Washington in late 2016 to take “reciprocal” actions in response to Obama administration sanctions for election interference, rather than escalating the situation into a “tit for tat.”“You might appreciate the sentiments that are raging in Moscow,” the ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, replied to Flynn’s request on the Dec, 29, 2016 call.
“I know, I - believe me, I do appreciate it, I very much appreciate it,” Flynn responded. “But I really don't want us to get into a situation where we're going, you know, where we do this and then you do something bigger, and then you know, everybody's got to go back and forth and everybody's got to be the tough guy here, you know?”
The next day, the president-elect praised his Russian counterpart for declining to retaliate, “Great move on delay (by V. Putin) - I always knew he was very smart!” he tweeted.
When Flynn and Kislyak followed up on Dec. 31, 2016, Kislyak emphasized that Russian President Vladimir Putin opted not to escalate the sanctions battle because of his talk with Flynn — despite “raging” feelings in Moscow. And Kisylak argued that the Obama administration sanctions were aimed at damaging the incoming Trump administration just as much as they were the Kremlin.
“I just wanted to tell you that we found that these actions have targeted not only against Russia, but also against the president elect,” Kisylak said.
The exchanges are at the heart of the controversy over the FBI’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and Trump campaign aides’ contacts with Russian officials throughout. They were released Friday as part of a batch of declassified transcripts to Congress and obtained by POLITICO, detailing conversations between Flynn, the retired lieutenant general, and Kisylak in the weeks before President Donald Trump took office.
The documents at one point show Flynn engaged in a prolonged discussion with Kislyak over the sanctions the outgoing administration had slapped on Russia hours earlier for its campaign meddling, an apparent effort to convince Moscow not to retaliate and to embrace a new relationship with the incoming Trump team. They show no sign that he condemned Russia’s interference in the 2016 election to Kislyak.
Flynn’s conversations with the ambassador were a key concern to FBI investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 election and the contacts between Russia and figures in Trump’s orbit during that period. Flynn later pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about the details of those contacts and spent more than a year cooperating with special counsel Robert Mueller, though he’s since moved to withdraw his plea.
The new materials involve calls on January 5, 2016; December 22, 2016; December 23, 2016; and a voicemail and subsequent phone call on December 29, 2016.
-
The Flynn Kislyak transcripts released: https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/29/declassified-flynn-transcripts-contradict-key-mueller-claims-against-flynn/
Tell me again about who lied:
Highly sought-after summaries and transcripts of intercepted phone calls between former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak contradict key claims made by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller in his criminal case against Flynn. The transcripts were provided to Congress on Friday and obtained by The Federalist. You can read the full documents here and here...(links at the original).
Flynn was charged by Mueller in 2017 with making false statements to federal officials about conversations he had with Kislyak on December 22 and December 29, 2017. According to the charging documents from Mueller, Flynn allegedly falsely claimed to Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) agents that he did not ask Kislyak to “refrain from escalating” in response to U.S. expulsion of Russian diplomats and falsely claimed that he did not ask Kislyak to help defeat an anti-Israel resolution pending before the United Nations at the time. Mueller also claimed that Flynn lied when he said he didn’t remember Kislyak telling him that Russia would “moderate its response” to the expulsions.
The transcript of the December 29 conversation, which was cited by Mueller, does not include a request from Flynn that Russia “refrain from escalating” in response to U.S. expulsions of Russian diplomats. According to the transcript, Flynn asked Kislyak for Russia’s response to be “reciprocal” so that the U.S.–not Russia–would not be forced to escalate beyond the expulsions. The transcript makes clear that Flynn fully expected Russia to respond to the situation by expelling U.S. diplomats in response to the Obama administration’s move to expel nearly three dozen Russian diplomats from the U.S., and that his primary concern was preventing a situation where the U.S. would have to escalate tensions in response to Russia.
“Make it reciprocal,” Flynn reportedly said. “[D]on’t go any further than you have to. Because I don’t want us to get into something that has to escalate, on a, you know, on a tit for tat.”
“I really don’t want us to get into a situation where we’re going, you know, where we do this and then you do something bigger, and then you know, everybody’s got to go back and forth and everybody’s got to be the tough guy here, you know?” Flynn continued. “We need cool heads to prevail, and uh, we need to be very steady about what we’re going to do because we have absolutely a common uh, threat in the Middle East right now.”
“We agree,” Kislyak responded.
Later in the conversation, Flynn again used the word “escalate” in reference not to a potential Russian response, but to what he hoped the United States would not have to do in response to Russian actions.
“If you have to do something, do something on a reciprocal basis,” Flynn said. “And, and then, we know that we’re not going to escalate this thing[.]”
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
The federalist take just sounds like semantics:
The transcript of the December 29 conversation, which was cited by Mueller, does not include a request from Flynn that Russia “refrain from escalating” in response to U.S. expulsions of Russian diplomats. According to the transcript, Flynn asked Kislyak for Russia’s response to be “reciprocal” so that the U.S.–not Russia–would not be forced to escalate beyond the expulsions.
Here's what Flynn said:
“You might appreciate the sentiments that are raging in Moscow,” the ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, replied to Flynn’s request on the Dec, 29, 2016 call.
“I know, I - believe me, I do appreciate it, I very much appreciate it,” Flynn responded. “But I really don't want us to get into a situation where we're going, you know, where we do this and then you do something bigger, and then you know, everybody's got to go back and forth and everybody's got to be the tough guy here, you know?”
Sounds like Flynn saying "refrain from escalating"
Brings me back to a statement I made in a different thread:
Flynn lying about the same thing that got him fired as the NSA indicates a pretty low-integrity guy.
So - can it be the case that both of these statements are true:
The FBI lacked integrity in its pursuit of Flynn
Flynn lacked integrity in his conduct as incoming NSA
-
The Flynn Kislyak transcripts released: https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/29/declassified-flynn-transcripts-contradict-key-mueller-claims-against-flynn/
Tell me again about who lied:
Highly sought-after summaries and transcripts of intercepted phone calls between former White House National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak contradict key claims made by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller in his criminal case against Flynn. The transcripts were provided to Congress on Friday and obtained by The Federalist. You can read the full documents here and here...(links at the original).
Flynn was charged by Mueller in 2017 with making false statements to federal officials about conversations he had with Kislyak on December 22 and December 29, 2017. According to the charging documents from Mueller, Flynn allegedly falsely claimed to Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) agents that he did not ask Kislyak to “refrain from escalating” in response to U.S. expulsion of Russian diplomats and falsely claimed that he did not ask Kislyak to help defeat an anti-Israel resolution pending before the United Nations at the time. Mueller also claimed that Flynn lied when he said he didn’t remember Kislyak telling him that Russia would “moderate its response” to the expulsions.
The transcript of the December 29 conversation, which was cited by Mueller, does not include a request from Flynn that Russia “refrain from escalating” in response to U.S. expulsions of Russian diplomats. According to the transcript, Flynn asked Kislyak for Russia’s response to be “reciprocal” so that the U.S.–not Russia–would not be forced to escalate beyond the expulsions. The transcript makes clear that Flynn fully expected Russia to respond to the situation by expelling U.S. diplomats in response to the Obama administration’s move to expel nearly three dozen Russian diplomats from the U.S., and that his primary concern was preventing a situation where the U.S. would have to escalate tensions in response to Russia.
“Make it reciprocal,” Flynn reportedly said. “[D]on’t go any further than you have to. Because I don’t want us to get into something that has to escalate, on a, you know, on a tit for tat.”
“I really don’t want us to get into a situation where we’re going, you know, where we do this and then you do something bigger, and then you know, everybody’s got to go back and forth and everybody’s got to be the tough guy here, you know?” Flynn continued. “We need cool heads to prevail, and uh, we need to be very steady about what we’re going to do because we have absolutely a common uh, threat in the Middle East right now.”
“We agree,” Kislyak responded.
Later in the conversation, Flynn again used the word “escalate” in reference not to a potential Russian response, but to what he hoped the United States would not have to do in response to Russian actions.
“If you have to do something, do something on a reciprocal basis,” Flynn said. “And, and then, we know that we’re not going to escalate this thing[.]”
How dare we not escalate into a tit for tat with a nuclear power and instead argue for cooler heads to prevail.
-
-
-
@George-K well, then he’s clearly a low integrity guy. Which is the actual assertion I’m making.
Pence was saying that his transition team wasn’t doing what Flynn was accused (?) of. And he didn’t seem to think it would be right for Flynn to have those talks during transition.
-
@George-K well, then he’s clearly a low integrity guy. Which is the actual assertion I’m making.
No. Again.
You asserted that he was fired because of inappropriate communications.
He resigned because he admitted to lying to VPOTUS.
Show me where he was fired because of what you claim were "inappropriate communications." You're moving goalposts.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
POTUS quote:
“He didn't tell the vice president of the United States the facts and then he didn't remember, and that's just not acceptable.”"I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence."
-
POTUS quote:
“He didn't tell the vice president of the United States the facts and then he didn't remember, and that's just not acceptable.”"I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence."
Actually, Trump asked Flynn to resign and Flynn submitted his resignation. Flynn was not actually fired.
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
POTUS quote:
“He didn't tell the vice president of the United States the facts and then he didn't remember, and that's just not acceptable.”"I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence."
Actually, Trump asked Flynn to resign and Flynn submitted his resignation. Flynn was not actually fired.
Ah, “asked to resign” is not “fired.” Bill Clinton would be proud of you.
-
POTUS quote:
“He didn't tell the vice president of the United States the facts and then he didn't remember, and that's just not acceptable.”"I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence."
Actually, Trump asked Flynn to resign and Flynn submitted his resignation. Flynn was not actually fired.
Ah, “asked to resign” is not “fired.” Bill Clinton would be proud of you.
Hey, if Xenon can parse every word, why not?
Always remember, Operation Valkyrie was an act of sedition.
Warning: I post things that interest me. Read and comment at your own discretion. -
POTUS quote:
“He didn't tell the vice president of the United States the facts and then he didn't remember, and that's just not acceptable.”"I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence."
Actually, Trump asked Flynn to resign and Flynn submitted his resignation. Flynn was not actually fired.
Ah, “asked to resign” is not “fired.” Bill Clinton would be proud of you.
Hey, if Xenon can parse every word, why not?
I did not say you cannot parse every word, I said only that Bill Clinton would be proud of you the way you parsed those words.
-
@George-K well, then he’s clearly a low integrity guy. Which is the actual assertion I’m making.
No. Again.
You asserted that he was fired because of inappropriate communications.
He resigned because he admitted to lying to VPOTUS.
Show me where he was fired because of what you claim were "inappropriate communications." You're moving goalposts.
@xenon said:
POTUS quote:
“He didn't tell the vice president of the United States the facts and then he didn't remember, and that's just not acceptable.”"I fired him because of what he said to Mike Pence."
Ah, so "lying" is "inappropriate communications."
Talk about parsing, LOL.
-
@George-K there are a lot of arguments floating around here. So I’ll try to be clearer.
My main point has always been that Flynn is a liar and got fired for it. Got fired for low integrity.
As for the inappropriate part, I’ll admit I don’t know what the norm is here. I hear partisans arguing both sides. I can understand the notion of reaching out to your soon-to-be counterparts to get a running start, and I can also understand the part of not affecting policy (e.g. don’t escalate) until you are actually the administration in place. (From the Obama admin’s perspective, isn’t Flynn subverting their foreign policy?)
I don’t know anything about the legalities there.
Now - the reason why I say that the administration likely thought it was inappropriate is because they fired Flynn for his omission here. If it was a trivial or routine thing he misrepresented, then it’s easy to say - “we got our wires crossed” “Flynn, actually did a great job there, he should have told me about it more clearly” etc. etc.
But - yes, that is me interpreting. And in my mind that’s a secondary point. As I said to Jolly earlier in the thread “that’s not the point. But if it were...”
