Bury Mama in the yard...
-
Honestly, from the tone of the article, it sounds like another "eating pets" story. Not sure how much truth there is to the story.
(not to make a joke about it, but they could do like the Zoroastrian's and use a tower of silence)
-
Good article... The USA could, for relatively very, very cheap (relatively...), improve FEMA ten-fold and make it the envy of the world in terms of speed and breadth of response anytime there is a natural disaster. If the President can make a political stunt and try to pay off student loans, you think he could find some coins in the couch to vastly improve FEMA for unexpected disasters like NC (or expected disasters like Milton...). You never know when there will be another massive disaster (volcano, etc...).... it doesn't cost that much to be overly prepared from a federal response perspective.
-
Good article... The USA could, for relatively very, very cheap (relatively...), improve FEMA ten-fold and make it the envy of the world in terms of speed and breadth of response anytime there is a natural disaster. If the President can make a political stunt and try to pay off student loans, you think he could find some coins in the couch to vastly improve FEMA for unexpected disasters like NC (or expected disasters like Milton...). You never know when there will be another massive disaster (volcano, etc...).... it doesn't cost that much to be overly prepared from a federal response perspective.
@89th said in Bury Mama in the yard...:
Good article... The USA could, for relatively very, very cheap (relatively...), improve FEMA ten-fold and make it the envy of the world in terms of speed and breadth of response anytime there is a natural disaster. If the President can make a political stunt and try to pay off student loans, you think he could find some coins in the couch to vastly improve FEMA for unexpected disasters like NC (or expected disasters like Milton...). You never know when there will be another massive disaster (volcano, etc...).... it doesn't cost that much to be overly prepared from a federal response perspective.
Not that simple.
One very small example: with every disaster, part of the calculation in response is how bad the rest of the year is going to be. So they respond in ways that are both commensurate with what they can do right now, and what they think the budget is going to have to bear in the near future. Which is impossible to know but that's part of the planning, because it's very easy for mother nature to clean out the coffers. (Least, this was true as of about 10 years ago when FEMA fully integrated into DHS.)
