Walz Vance debate
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Walz Vance debate:
Do they challenge him on the claim that police died because of January 6th?
Nope.
-
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Walz Vance debate:
Do they challenge him on the claim that police died because of January 6th?
He said 140 police officers were beaten.
-
@Horace said in Walz Vance debate:
@LuFins-Dad said in Walz Vance debate:
Do they challenge him on the claim that police died because of January 6th?
He said 140 police officers were beaten.
And many later died.
-
@Jolly said in Walz Vance debate:
@Horace said in Walz Vance debate:
@LuFins-Dad said in Walz Vance debate:
Do they challenge him on the claim that police died because of January 6th?
He said 140 police officers were beaten.
And many later died.
Not inaccurate. I’m sure many police officers have died since January 6.
-
Over 80% of people exposed to DiHydrogen Monoxide have died.
-
-
@Jolly said in Walz Vance debate:
@Mik said in Walz Vance debate:
Yeah, I agree, George. Been pleasantly surprised by Walz.
Six term congressman, two term governor. He's not a novice politician.
You need to understand the low standard I expected.
-
@Mik said in Walz Vance debate:
@Jolly said in Walz Vance debate:
@Mik said in Walz Vance debate:
Yeah, I agree, George. Been pleasantly surprised by Walz.
Six term congressman, two term governor. He's not a novice politician.
You need to understand the low standard I expected.
The Harris Campaign had spent days lowering expectations, much as they did for her.
-
My take? Vance handled the abortion question brilliantly. That needs to become the pro-life platform for the time being.
Walz came across better on gun control, excepting his weird thing about befriending school shooters and the thing about his son witnessing a shooting. You know that’s going to be fact checked. It sounds like all of the other exaggerations Walz has made.
I liked how Vance turned the Jan 6 question around to a challenge about censorship and the 1st amendment.
Altogether, though? Both scared the shit out of me. Both are fully engaged in the idea of a large and expansive government that needs to have it’s fingerprints on everything, from the price of a load of bread, to people’s investments in their homes, to national daycare. They both seem to think government is the answer for everything.