Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. It’s starting

It’s starting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
234 Posts 15 Posters 6.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Online
    HoraceH Online
    Horace
    wrote on last edited by
    #224

    Betting markets are now 80% for Trump winning the electoral college. Started the night in the high 50s.

    Education is extremely important.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      @jon-nyc said in It’s starting:

      So if she’s going to pull it off it’ll have to be due to her increased strength with whites generally and with women in particular. Relative to Biden.

      Maybe.

      Initial numbers show her doing better in some places, worse in others

      Maybe we'll wind up 279-279.

      Which is fine by me.

      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins DadL Offline
      LuFins Dad
      wrote on last edited by
      #225

      @Jolly said in It’s starting:

      @jon-nyc said in It’s starting:

      So if she’s going to pull it off it’ll have to be due to her increased strength with whites generally and with women in particular. Relative to Biden.

      Maybe.

      Initial numbers show her doing better in some places, worse in others

      Maybe we'll wind up 279-279.

      Which is fine by me.

      Really? I’m seeing very few places where she is outperforming Biden.

      The Brad

      1 Reply Last reply
      • kluursK Online
        kluursK Online
        kluurs
        wrote on last edited by
        #226

        Just eyeballing things, Trump seems safe to get around 250 w/o real effort. It may be PA that decides this thing.

        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
        • kluursK kluurs

          Just eyeballing things, Trump seems safe to get around 250 w/o real effort. It may be PA that decides this thing.

          George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #227

          @kluurs said in It’s starting:

          Just eyeballing things, Trump seems safe to get around 250 w/o real effort. It may be PA that decides this thing.

          Though DDHQ called Virginia for Harris, there's some question about that being premature.

          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • HoraceH Online
            HoraceH Online
            Horace
            wrote on last edited by
            #228

            85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.

            Education is extremely important.

            jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #229

              Any chance we see MI, WI, PA called tonight? Because it's come down to those. (big surprise)

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Horace

                85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.

                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #230

                @Horace said in It’s starting:

                85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.

                How do we know it isn't a bunch of concerned Dems hedging their bets now following the trend and selling off in favor of Trump?

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  @Horace said in It’s starting:

                  85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.

                  How do we know it isn't a bunch of concerned Dems hedging their bets now following the trend and selling off in favor of Trump?

                  HoraceH Online
                  HoraceH Online
                  Horace
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #231

                  @jon-nyc said in It’s starting:

                  @Horace said in It’s starting:

                  85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.

                  How do we know it isn't a bunch of concerned Dems hedging their bets now following the trend and selling off in favor of Trump?

                  is there a sense in which that doesn't mean the betting public is gaining faith in a Trump victory? I don't see how the desired outcome of the people moving money around, makes any difference.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Axtremus

                    https://www.natesilver.net/p/nate-silver-2024-president-election-polls-model

                    Last and final update: 12:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 5. Happy Election Day! At exactly midnight on Tuesday, we ran our simulation model for the final time in this election cycle. Out of 80,000 simulations, Kamala Harris won in 40,012 (50.015%) cases.

                    That's Nate Silver's "pencils down" final answer for who his model predict will win the 2024 presidential election.

                    George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #232

                    @Axtremus said in It’s starting:

                    https://www.natesilver.net/p/nate-silver-2024-president-election-polls-model

                    Last and final update: 12:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 5. Happy Election Day! At exactly midnight on Tuesday, we ran our simulation model for the final time in this election cycle. Out of 80,000 simulations, Kamala Harris won in 40,012 (50.015%) cases.

                    That's Nate Silver's "pencils down" final answer for who his model predict will win the 2024 presidential election.

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                      #233

                      Nice to see he didn’t get a majority. (If Nate’s right anyway). So close. I wonder what he’ll attribute it to? lol

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by Jolly
                        #234

                        That's the late California vote.

                        As long as he still wins the popular vote, I don't think it's a big deal.

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups