It’s starting
-
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
So if she’s going to pull it off it’ll have to be due to her increased strength with whites generally and with women in particular. Relative to Biden.
Maybe.
Initial numbers show her doing better in some places, worse in others
Maybe we'll wind up 279-279.
Which is fine by me.
wrote on 6 Nov 2024, 02:58 last edited by@Jolly said in It’s starting:
@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
So if she’s going to pull it off it’ll have to be due to her increased strength with whites generally and with women in particular. Relative to Biden.
Maybe.
Initial numbers show her doing better in some places, worse in others
Maybe we'll wind up 279-279.
Which is fine by me.
Really? I’m seeing very few places where she is outperforming Biden.
-
wrote on 6 Nov 2024, 02:59 last edited by
Just eyeballing things, Trump seems safe to get around 250 w/o real effort. It may be PA that decides this thing.
-
Just eyeballing things, Trump seems safe to get around 250 w/o real effort. It may be PA that decides this thing.
wrote on 6 Nov 2024, 03:00 last edited by@kluurs said in It’s starting:
Just eyeballing things, Trump seems safe to get around 250 w/o real effort. It may be PA that decides this thing.
Though DDHQ called Virginia for Harris, there's some question about that being premature.
-
wrote on 6 Nov 2024, 03:09 last edited by
85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.
-
wrote on 6 Nov 2024, 03:09 last edited by
Any chance we see MI, WI, PA called tonight? Because it's come down to those. (big surprise)
-
85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.
wrote on 6 Nov 2024, 03:16 last edited by@Horace said in It’s starting:
85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.
How do we know it isn't a bunch of concerned Dems hedging their bets now following the trend and selling off in favor of Trump?
-
@Horace said in It’s starting:
85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.
How do we know it isn't a bunch of concerned Dems hedging their bets now following the trend and selling off in favor of Trump?
wrote on 6 Nov 2024, 03:23 last edited by@jon-nyc said in It’s starting:
@Horace said in It’s starting:
85% for Trump winning now on the betting market I'm following. Kamala better hope lots of dumb money is flowing in.
How do we know it isn't a bunch of concerned Dems hedging their bets now following the trend and selling off in favor of Trump?
is there a sense in which that doesn't mean the betting public is gaining faith in a Trump victory? I don't see how the desired outcome of the people moving money around, makes any difference.
-
https://www.natesilver.net/p/nate-silver-2024-president-election-polls-model
Last and final update: 12:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 5. Happy Election Day! At exactly midnight on Tuesday, we ran our simulation model for the final time in this election cycle. Out of 80,000 simulations, Kamala Harris won in 40,012 (50.015%) cases.
That's Nate Silver's "pencils down" final answer for who his model predict will win the 2024 presidential election.
wrote on 6 Nov 2024, 04:07 last edited by@Axtremus said in It’s starting:
https://www.natesilver.net/p/nate-silver-2024-president-election-polls-model
Last and final update: 12:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 5. Happy Election Day! At exactly midnight on Tuesday, we ran our simulation model for the final time in this election cycle. Out of 80,000 simulations, Kamala Harris won in 40,012 (50.015%) cases.
That's Nate Silver's "pencils down" final answer for who his model predict will win the 2024 presidential election.
-
wrote on 12 Nov 2024, 13:47 last edited by jon-nyc 11 Dec 2024, 13:47
-
wrote on 12 Nov 2024, 13:51 last edited by Jolly 11 Dec 2024, 13:51
That's the late California vote.
As long as he still wins the popular vote, I don't think it's a big deal.