Garland's Brag
-
If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.
But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............
-
If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.
But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............
@taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:
If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.
But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............
Isn't that what I said?
The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
@taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:
If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.
But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............
Isn't that what I said?
The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...
@Jolly said in Garland's Brag:
@taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:
If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.
But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............
Isn't that what I said?
The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...
Maybe I misunderstood. I thought you were saying that there was some sort of judge conspiracy against President Trump and his followers, especially as relating to Jan 6
-
@taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:
If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.
But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............
Isn't that what I said?
The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...
@Jolly said in Garland's Brag:
@taiwan_girl said in Garland's Brag:
If it were one judge, yeah, maybe it could be said it was unjustified.
But, when it is multiple judges from all sides of politics...............
Isn't that what I said?
The Swamp is bipartisan. Throw in Bernie and it's tripartisan...
There's an old saw that if you find that absolutely everybody you work with thinks you're an asshole, maybe they're not the problem.
-
@89th said in Garland's Brag:
The prosecutor asked for 18-24 months, because of a plea deal. So I guess, plea deal is the answer to your question?
Ask yourself why the prosecutor asked for 20% of the usual sentence for arson.
Not to mention arson of a police car.
Why sentenced to ONLY $30K restitution for a police car?
During a riot during which other Molotov cocktails they distributed.
Was there a plea deal?
Yeah, the terrorism charge was dropped. Firebombing during a riot - dropped.
Sorry, we'll have to disagree. Sparks' crime doesn't even come close to this.
@George-K said in Garland's Brag:
@89th said in Garland's Brag:
The prosecutor asked for 18-24 months, because of a plea deal. So I guess, plea deal is the answer to your question?
Ask yourself why the prosecutor asked for 20% of the usual sentence for arson.
Not to mention arson of a police car.
Why sentenced to ONLY $30K restitution for a police car?
During a riot during which other Molotov cocktails they distributed.
Was there a plea deal?
Yeah, the terrorism charge was dropped. Firebombing during a riot - dropped.
Sorry, we'll have to disagree. Sparks' crime doesn't even come close to this.
I'm not comparing the two sentences. There are a billion examples of sentences that are too harsh relative to ones that are too light. Now, does it help that the lawyer plead guilty and showed remorse, whereas Sparks denies the crimes, taunted the court, and profited off of it? Not the smartest goose in the MAGgle.
