Shapiro vs Swalwell

[Doctor Phibes]

I've heard of project 2525. Of course, it's not clear whether their man, or indeed any man, will still be alive.

[kluurs]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Shapiro vs Swalwell:

I've heard of project 2525. Of course, it's not clear whether their man, or indeed any man, will still be alive.

I hadn't thought of that song till you mentioned it. We should party like it's 1999.

[Jolly]

Shapiro is not who I would want to exchange quick thoughts with...

[Renauda]

@kluurs said in Shapiro vs Swalwell:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Shapiro vs Swalwell:

I've heard of project 2525. Of course, it's not clear whether their man, or indeed any man, will still be alive.

I hadn't thought of that song till you mentioned it. We should party like it's 1999.

I think you meant like in 1969. That was the No. 1 hit of that summer. I remember it well. Apollo 11, Woodstock our summer trip camping on Lake Coeur d’Alene in Idaho.

[jon-nyc]

Seemed forced not clever. Like he had the joke and decided he was going to use it whether there was a good opportunity for it or not.

[taiwan_girl]

I dont understand how he "broke" the guys brain. Seemed like a pretty normal exchange.

[jon-nyc]

I think it’s up there with ‘owned’ ‘shredded’ and ‘destroyed’ as a sign the post can be safely ignored.

[Horace]

IMO pwnage of magats has that special blend of truthiness and hilarity that demands to be shared.

[89th]

I enjoy watching Ben Shapiro break brains

[jon-nyc]

Do you consider this to be an example of that?

[taiwan_girl]

It was a (semi) witty comments. Jillions of examples of that on the internet. Maybe we should start a separate forum thread on "breaking brains" with witty comments.

For example:

Link to video

Go to 3:20

[kluurs]

Jon's correct - and it's a feature of both left and right "pundits" - and I use that term loosely. It's click-bait - makes one watch - and if you're a pro-whomever, maybe you do think that "oh yeah, your mother wore army boots" was incisive and clever - but most folks will think - not much to see here.

[George K]

Noted political scholar, Mark Hamill comments on Project 2025's agenda.

Project 2025 responds.

Project 2025 responds to the Biden ad.

[Jolly]

Wonder how many will read the rebuttal?

I haven't read the 2025 project, but a non-partisan reading and a nice debate on its suggestions might be good for the American public...The sort of thing NPR and PBS ought to be doing.

And don't.

[George K]

@Jolly said in Shapiro vs Swalwell:

The sort of thing NPR and PBS ought to be doing.

I keep forgetting. What's the "P" in those stand for?

[89th]

@jon-nyc said in Shapiro vs Swalwell:

Do you consider this to be an example of that?

Not at all. It was a pleasant exchange, actually. That was a clickbait twitter title.

[xenon]

Why does Ben Shapiro need to address congressional committees?

[89th]

It's dumb. They wanted a conservative voice (if I were them I'd never invite Shaprio out of fear of getting logic dunked on) to talk about Project 2025 I guess? It's a mostly made up strategy by the democrats to shift focus from the Resident to fear monger about Trump.

[Aqua Letifer]

@Doctor-Phibes said in Shapiro vs Swalwell:

I've heard of project 2525. Of course, it's not clear whether their man, or indeed any man, will still be alive.

I have written my congressmen to vote "no" on Zager/Evans 2525.

[Renauda]

@Aqua-Letifer said in Shapiro vs Swalwell:

@Doctor-Phibes said in Shapiro vs Swalwell:

I've heard of project 2525. Of course, it's not clear whether their man, or indeed any man, will still be alive.

I have written my congressmen to vote "no" on Zager/Evans 2525.