Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. SpaceX launches Starship 4 today.

SpaceX launches Starship 4 today.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
3 Posts 3 Posters 34 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    SpaceX launched Starship 4 today. Goal was to get it into space, and have it reenter without burning up.

    Successful mission with only some heat shield tiles coming off. Made a “soft landing” in the Indian Ocean (and probably sank right after that).

    Link to video

    I saw a comment that the philosophical difference between NASA and SpaceX is that NASA wants everything to be perfect before a launch attempt, whereas SpaceX is less fussy and considers “failures” valuable to learn from.

    NASA designs its spacecraft to work the first time they fly, so they are exquisitely engineered from the beginning. This has the advantage of making a craft that doesn't tend to blow up for all the cameras to see, but also means that they are wildly expensive to develop, can take forever to build, and never meet budget targets.

    SpaceX's strategy is vastly different. The design process is iterative--start with a "good enough" design, test and break it, figuring out the strengths and weaknesses. Rinse, repeat.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG George K

      SpaceX launched Starship 4 today. Goal was to get it into space, and have it reenter without burning up.

      Successful mission with only some heat shield tiles coming off. Made a “soft landing” in the Indian Ocean (and probably sank right after that).

      Link to video

      I saw a comment that the philosophical difference between NASA and SpaceX is that NASA wants everything to be perfect before a launch attempt, whereas SpaceX is less fussy and considers “failures” valuable to learn from.

      NASA designs its spacecraft to work the first time they fly, so they are exquisitely engineered from the beginning. This has the advantage of making a craft that doesn't tend to blow up for all the cameras to see, but also means that they are wildly expensive to develop, can take forever to build, and never meet budget targets.

      SpaceX's strategy is vastly different. The design process is iterative--start with a "good enough" design, test and break it, figuring out the strengths and weaknesses. Rinse, repeat.

      CopperC Offline
      CopperC Offline
      Copper
      wrote on last edited by Copper
      #2

      The booster splashes into the Gulf of Mexico

      The Starship into the Indian Ocean

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Littering.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups