Liz Lied
-
Good job @89th
PS Did you also use your photo skills on the recent picture of the royal princess in UK? LOL
-
Good job @89th
PS Did you also use your photo skills on the recent picture of the royal princess in UK? LOL
@taiwan_girl said in Liz Lied:
Good job @89th
PS Did you also use your photo skills on the recent picture of the royal princess in UK? LOL
Haha no but I read a passing article about it... it boggles my mind that they'd have so many errors on such a public image.
-
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
-
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up.
Hang in there 89. Pay no attention to the gossips.
-
10,000 National Guard troops?
You folks have given up on the "peaceful tourists taking selfies" narrative, right?
Why would one "pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops" just for peaceful tourists taking selfies? -
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
-
Ah, the usuals show up. Reminds of the two old hecklers on The Muppet Show, yelling from the balcony.
-
Ah, the usuals show up. Reminds of the two old hecklers on The Muppet Show, yelling from the balcony.
-
-
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
I can nearly guarantee you there were undercover FBI agents there. And I can equally guarantee the FBI did not rile the crowd up or lead them towards doing anything wrong.
-
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
I can nearly guarantee you there were undercover FBI agents there. And I can equally guarantee the FBI did not rile the crowd up or lead them towards doing anything wrong.
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
I can nearly guarantee you there were undercover FBI agents there. And I can equally guarantee the FBI did not rile the crowd up or lead them towards doing anything wrong.
Ray Epps.
-
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
I don't have an opinion on a lot of what the various talking heads are purporting as truth.
I do, however, have an opinion as to the Jan 6 Committee and its credibility.
First of all, we can talk about how a Hollywood producer was retained to add a soundtrack to the video to amplify the mayhem.
Then, we can talk about how the video of Josh Hawley (and I'm not a fan of his) running out of the building was shown in the hearing room, much to the laughter of the people in the chamber.
(by the way, for all those who are criticizing TuCa's "selective editing" of newly released Jan 6 video, I offer this as an example of selective editing)
Third the inability of other members of Congress to call witnesses, cross-examine, etc destroyed what little credibility this body had.
The members of this so-called "bipartisan" group were hand-picked by the Speaker. Though the minority leader proposed other members, his choices were declined, breaking a long-standing tradition.
So many transcripts, which were to be turned over to the new majority GOP mysteriously disappeared.
The Secret Service agent's testimony of what Hutchinson claimed was withheld, for three years.
Finally, Ms Hutchinson's testimony would have been laughed out of any courtroom because she was not a witness.
If the Democrats had been serious about the investigation, none of these would have occurred. But they were not, choosing, instead, to go for political theater rather than fact finding.
If you lie about one thing, why should I believe you in anything else?