Liz Lied
-
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 13:54 last edited by
Had to split the image because of size.
Anyway... it's not as bombastic a case as the Federalist article makes it seem.
Meadows was on a call with the DC Mayor and asked if she had what she needed (for the pro vs anti Trump crowds... no mention of the Capitol FYI). Ornato didn't recall the 10,000 conversation at first, but later said he recalls Meadows telling the DC Mayor that Trump is willing to ask for up to 10,000 guardsmen for the pro vs anti Trump crowds.
This is a little different than the "President Donald Trump pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the nation’s capital" claim.
-
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 13:55 last edited by 89th 3 Nov 2024, 13:55
I notice the article says capital instead of Capitol, btw. Subtle, but on purpose.
One is an informal reference to a city, the other one is what actually was attacked.
-
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 14:21 last edited by
Good job @89th
PS Did you also use your photo skills on the recent picture of the royal princess in UK? LOL
-
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 14:25 last edited by
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
-
Good job @89th
PS Did you also use your photo skills on the recent picture of the royal princess in UK? LOL
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 16:07 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Liz Lied:
Good job @89th
PS Did you also use your photo skills on the recent picture of the royal princess in UK? LOL
Haha no but I read a passing article about it... it boggles my mind that they'd have so many errors on such a public image.
-
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 16:09 last edited by
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
-
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 16:58 last edited by
10,000 National Guard troops?
You folks have given up on the "peaceful tourists taking selfies" narrative, right?
Why would one "pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops" just for peaceful tourists taking selfies? -
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 18:05 last edited by89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up.
Hang in there 89. Pay no attention to the gossips.
-
10,000 National Guard troops?
You folks have given up on the "peaceful tourists taking selfies" narrative, right?
Why would one "pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops" just for peaceful tourists taking selfies?wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 19:21 last edited by Doctor Phibes 3 Nov 2024, 19:22 -
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 19:32 last edited by
Ah, the usuals show up. Reminds of the two old hecklers on The Muppet Show, yelling from the balcony.
-
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 19:33 last edited by89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
-
Ah, the usuals show up. Reminds of the two old hecklers on The Muppet Show, yelling from the balcony.
-
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 20:36 last edited by
-
wrote on 11 Mar 2024, 20:50 last edited by
-
Ah, the usuals show up. Reminds of the two old hecklers on The Muppet Show, yelling from the balcony.
wrote on 12 Mar 2024, 01:09 last edited by -
wrote on 12 Mar 2024, 03:13 last edited by
@Doctor-Phibes said in Liz Lied:
Ah, the usuals show up. Reminds of the two old hecklers on The Muppet Show, yelling from the balcony.
Unlike, for example, your two main election candidates?
LOL
-
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
wrote on 12 Mar 2024, 03:15 last edited by89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
I can nearly guarantee you there were undercover FBI agents there. And I can equally guarantee the FBI did not rile the crowd up or lead them towards doing anything wrong.
-
89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
I can nearly guarantee you there were undercover FBI agents there. And I can equally guarantee the FBI did not rile the crowd up or lead them towards doing anything wrong.
wrote on 12 Mar 2024, 03:18 last edited by89th is invested in ignoring the Truth.
Carry on, lad.
No just trying to be fair and not bite into the sensationalism from either side. I think the truth is pretty self-evident now with what happened. Trump didn't lead the march into the Capitol nor did the FBI plant agents to secretly rile people up. Hindsight is 50/50 but it would be pretty silly to have 10,000 military guys show up for a sore loser temper tantrum rally.
You're telling me the FBI didn't have assets in the crowd?
I can nearly guarantee you there were undercover FBI agents there. And I can equally guarantee the FBI did not rile the crowd up or lead them towards doing anything wrong.
Ray Epps.
-
wrote on 12 Mar 2024, 03:48 last edited by
LOL soooooo debunked but keep reading what you wish.
