The Curious Case of Claudine Gay
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2023, 15:40 last edited by
-
wrote on 19 Dec 2023, 21:41 last edited by
-
wrote on 19 Dec 2023, 21:42 last edited by George K
-
wrote on 19 Dec 2023, 23:10 last edited by jon-nyc
My guess is she’ll resign as president without admitting wrongdoing, rather just claiming that the (unfair) campaign against her is becoming too much of a distraction for the institution.
-
wrote on 19 Dec 2023, 23:19 last edited by
@George-K said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
Rufo won't let go, LOL.
Okay, that was really bad.
-
wrote on 19 Dec 2023, 23:24 last edited by
I won't feel safe until she is in prison.
-
My guess is she’ll resign as president without admitting wrongdoing, rather just claiming that the (unfair) campaign against her is becoming too much of a distraction for the institution.
wrote on 19 Dec 2023, 23:32 last edited by@jon-nyc said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
the (unfair) campaign against her
Are you saying the campaign is unfair, or that she would claim that it is.
-
wrote on 19 Dec 2023, 23:44 last edited by jon-nyc
The latter.
Though they (the trio) certainly are being scapegoated for university policies with broad support throughout the administration and trustees.
But that’s one of the jobs of a leader. So in that sense it isn’t really unfair. Comes with the territory and the large salary.
-
wrote on 20 Dec 2023, 01:53 last edited by LuFins Dad
Okay, but would you also agree that they could have been and should have been better prepared for their testimony? Beyond that, do you also agree that these school administrations have not done an adequate job in addressing these protests and incidents of violence and physical intimidation on campus?
-
wrote on 20 Dec 2023, 02:37 last edited by
I wonder what the lawyers who gave them their talking points, were trying to avoid.
-
wrote on 20 Dec 2023, 02:46 last edited by
Yes, all 3 acted like guilty children.
They should have defended their policy, it is probably legal and certainly has lots support among their fellow loons.
-
wrote on 20 Dec 2023, 13:58 last edited by jon-nyc
@Horace said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
I wonder what the lawyers who gave them their talking points, were trying to avoid.
Penalties under the title VI investigations that were already underway by the DoJ, and all the lawsuits from Jewish students that would follow.
-
Okay, but would you also agree that they could have been and should have been better prepared for their testimony? Beyond that, do you also agree that these school administrations have not done an adequate job in addressing these protests and incidents of violence and physical intimidation on campus?
wrote on 20 Dec 2023, 14:03 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
Okay, but would you also agree that they could have been and should have been better prepared for their testimony?
Yes, as one wag put it, WilmerHale might have told them to say “it depends” but they didn’t tell them to smirk.
Beyond that, do you also agree that these school administrations have not done an adequate job in addressing these protests and incidents of violence and physical intimidation on campus?
I doubt they have, but in fairness it’s hard to say, we see videos of the incidents but there’s little reporting on any aftermath.
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2023, 01:40 last edited by
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2023, 01:55 last edited by
For a sense of perspective, just remember what Summers, Harvard's previous president, resignation was caused by.
Also remember, and contrast his scholarly publications.
-
wrote on 21 Dec 2023, 02:10 last edited by
His appearance doesn't have the same scholarly qualification.
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2023, 12:51 last edited by
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2023, 13:01 last edited by
That’s a pleasant surprise.
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2023, 13:08 last edited by
@LuFins-Dad said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
One of Gay’s plagiarized authors speaks out…
Unfortunately Dr. Swain probably only represents about 98% of the country.
It is time to start ignoring that other 2%.
-
wrote on 22 Dec 2023, 22:44 last edited by xenon
Apparently Harvard said they found more "examples of duplicative language without appropriate attribution.”
Lucky for her they didn't find any plagiarism.
Harvard seems to be on a speedrun to burn down centuries of accumulated prestige.
