The Curious Case of Claudine Gay
-
Take a bow, Mr Ackman.
-
And Stefanik for getting the ball rolling in the first place.
-
By the way, the Harvard Corporation statement at least mentions her transgressions. Not with specifics but it at least mentions that there were some.
-
And the Associated (with Democrats) Press finds conservatives pouncing. Or is is seizing?
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@George-K said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
I thought that was from the Bee when I read it.
But no!
It is real AP.
-
The interns aren’t taking it very well.
-
Has somebody ran that AP article past a plagiarism detection program?
-
Gee, don't you imagine the Columbia President is counting her blessings about a scheduling conflict right now. That was supposed to be the fourth witness at the hearing.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
Has somebody ran that AP article past a plagiarism detection program?
Makes you wonder how accurate these things are.
https://plagiarismdetector.net
-
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
@George-K said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
And the Associated (with Democrats) Press finds conservatives pouncing. Or is is seizing?
On X, formerly Twitter, he wrote “SCALPED,” as if Gay was a trophy of violence, invoking a gruesome practice taken up by white colonists who sought to eradicate Native Americans.
Uhm, what?
-
"My pronouns are FA/FO." - Mik, 2024
-
@Mik said in The Curious Case of Claudine Gay:
Ackman’s tweet is terrifying.
Yes, it is.
Wonder if he would take Gay's old job?
-
What I learned, however, was that DEI was not about diversity in its purest form, but rather DEI was a political advocacy movement on behalf of certain groups that are deemed oppressed under DEI’s own methodology.
Under DEI, one’s degree of oppression is determined based upon where one resides on a so-called intersectional pyramid of oppression where whites, Jews, and Asians are deemed oppressors, and a subset of people of color, LGBTQ people, and/or women are deemed to be oppressed. Under this ideology which is the philosophical underpinning of DEI as advanced by Ibram X. Kendi and others, one is either an anti-racist or a racist. There is no such thing as being “not racist.”
Well summarized.
