Removed
-
The bbc link is also just horseshit.
"And in 2005 she said. . . " (for example).Oh? This one doctor represents everyone else?
Maybe. But how about a screen shot of the actual tweet, or a video of what she said in a sermon, etc.Nope. It's all just to be taken in faith, the journalist does not need to provide actual evidence. I wonder why not? An actual video where we can see and hear what she said, in her own words.
And even if she is some kind of nut, what does that mean?
Imagine if someone focused upon one of us on this forum, and then used the one person to represent everyone else on this forum. How accurate would that be?
It's all so obvious, but leads back to my assessment that pulling the plug on her, or on anyone, is censorship and is WRONG.
-
OK, Jon. You're right. She is an evil witch, and the culture she might represent is backwards and should be eliminated.
Do you have a picture where she spouts this stuff, and all the other doctors, from MD PhD to the MD/attorney agree with her cultural background?
You are right. The Masters of the Universe need to cancel people based upon their desires to control the thinking of all the stupid, gullible people. Then, the world will be a better place.
-
Here's a summary of the people involved:
-
I mentioned I had a YouTube video where there was a picture of page after page, resumes of the doctors.
I went to the YouTube video, and it's gone! There is a notice that the video violated YouTube's terms of agreement.
Good job, YouTube. Bastards.
Give it a rest, Jon. It's not as important to me to "win" as it is to you, apparently.
You win. And I've got to get back to work.
-
I don't see why it's so hard to admit somebody's a nutter.
-
I don't see why it's so hard to admit somebody's a nutter.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Removed:
I don't see why it's so hard to admit somebody's a nutter.
Like Jon said, I'm hydroxychloroquine agnostic, at least for now.
But to address your comment, if someone's a nutter on one thing, does that disqualify them on all things?
"I think the world is flat, but let me tell you about my theory on computer algorithms." The two are not mutually exclusive, are they?
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
Yeah, and Hitler was a dog loving vegetarian. (I did it. I brought in Hitler!)
I'm completely agnostic on Hydro-thingie, too, but if I found out my GP believed in alien sperm and demon DNA, I'd change my GP.
-
Yeah, and Hitler was a dog loving vegetarian. (I did it. I brought in Hitler!)
I'm completely agnostic on Hydro-thingie, too, but if I found out my GP believed in alien sperm and demon DNA, I'd change my GP.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Removed:
Yeah, and Hitler was a dog loving vegetarian. (I did it. I brought in Hitler!)
I'm completely agnostic on Hydro-thingie, too, but if I found out my GP believed in alien sperm and demon DNA, I'd change my GP.
This can be a fun game (and it even talks about dogs!): LBJ said that his dogs loved having their ears pulled - does that make his civil rights legislation invalid?
https://groovyhistory.com/lbj-dog-ears-beagle-lyndon-johnson
However, if my doc said those things, I'd probably switch as well.
-
If Hydro is effective, then we should definitely use it.
My question regarding that particular drug isn't whether it's effective, but why Donald Trump seems so keen on it. The other side have also politicised it shamelessly, but doesn't anybody find his enthusiasm just a tad suspicious?
-
OK, Jon. You're right. She is an evil witch, and the culture she might represent is backwards and should be eliminated.
Do you have a picture where she spouts this stuff, and all the other doctors, from MD PhD to the MD/attorney agree with her cultural background?
You are right. The Masters of the Universe need to cancel people based upon their desires to control the thinking of all the stupid, gullible people. Then, the world will be a better place.
OK, Jon. You're right. She is an evil witch, and the culture she might represent is backwards and should be eliminated.
Do you have a picture where she spouts this stuff, and all the other doctors, from MD PhD to the MD/attorney agree with her cultural background?
You are right. The Masters of the Universe need to cancel people based upon their desires to control the thinking of all the stupid, gullible people. Then, the world will be a better place.
Free speech? Fuggedaboutit...
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
I'm not actually defending YouTube's behaviour which I think is wrong, but clearly they do have the right to do this, just as we had the right to ban that loony toon conspiracy guy from posting here.
Of course, everybody knows the correct way to try and stifle messages we don't like is by taking out a lawsuit.
-
OK, Jon. You're right. She is an evil witch, and the culture she might represent is backwards and should be eliminated.
Do you have a picture where she spouts this stuff, and all the other doctors, from MD PhD to the MD/attorney agree with her cultural background?
You are right. The Masters of the Universe need to cancel people based upon their desires to control the thinking of all the stupid, gullible people. Then, the world will be a better place.
Free speech? Fuggedaboutit...
-
Free speech? Fuggedaboutit
It's not what it's cracked up to be. You'll get used to it and you'll love the direction the country is heading. The current faux-revolution will soon be over.
And the real one starts?
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Removed:
I don't see why it's so hard to admit somebody's a nutter.
Like Jon said, I'm hydroxychloroquine agnostic, at least for now.
But to address your comment, if someone's a nutter on one thing, does that disqualify them on all things?
"I think the world is flat, but let me tell you about my theory on computer algorithms." The two are not mutually exclusive, are they?
-
The point is not to say that Hydro is bad, but to question Trump's motives in promoting it so much, and also note that his choice of people to listen to isn't exactly top-notch.
It is possible for people to be right for the wrong reasons.
-
The point is not to say that Hydro is bad, but to question Trump's motives in promoting it so much, and also note that his choice of people to listen to isn't exactly top-notch.
It is possible for people to be right for the wrong reasons.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Removed:
The point is not to say that Hydro is bad, but to question Trump's motives in promoting it so much, and also note that his choice of people to listen to isn't exactly top-notch.
It is possible for people to be right for the wrong reasons.
Why has Trump promoted it?
- It may work. At least some of the time.
- It's cheap as dirt.
- Hope. When you're drowning, you don't bitch that you found a board that helps keep you afloat and not a life preserver. You're just glad you found a board.
