Removed
-
Demon semen, alien DNA, and hydroxychloroquine?
We gotta think of a name for that cocktail.
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 23:30 last edited by -
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 02:03 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 02:05 last edited by
By the way, I should say I remain personally agnostic about hydroxychloroquine. But there’s no question these crackpots that Trump touted are quacks.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 04:00 last edited by
Jon, I know I can come across as an idiot.
But I expect more from you.
Whatever you do, DO NOT look up the resumes of the participating doctors, it just might surprise you that your background does not come even close to their extraordinary backgrounds.Let's see if I can capture the contemporary perspective: If they drown, they're human, if they float, they are canceled. Simple!
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 12:29 last edited by Doctor Phibes
If you Google Doctor Stella Immanuel you'll find she certainly has an extraordinary background.
-
If you Google Doctor Stella Immanuel you'll find she certainly has an extraordinary background.
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 16:15 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Removed:
If you Google Doctor Stella Immanuel you'll find she certainly has an extraordinary background.
Shut up, Orange Man Bad guy. TDS.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 21:24 last edited by
No, Aqua.
If I get time, I'll type out some of their resumes. Very impressive. I've got their resumes paused on a video, I don't know how to capture an image off of a video, which was taken before their web site was taken down.BUT THAT'S NOT THE POINT!
The overriding point is that the Masters of the Universe are at the forefront of cancel culture, and they could care less what anyone, including congress, says. They eliminated these physicians and by extension their expertise and input, by pulling them off of YouTube, Twitter, etc. Instead of supporting or bashing them in the public, they removed them all from the public square. Simple. Imagine having that kind of power!
That is past dangerous. That scares the shit out of me.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 21:33 last edited by
The bbc link is also just horseshit.
"And in 2005 she said. . . " (for example).Oh? This one doctor represents everyone else?
Maybe. But how about a screen shot of the actual tweet, or a video of what she said in a sermon, etc.Nope. It's all just to be taken in faith, the journalist does not need to provide actual evidence. I wonder why not? An actual video where we can see and hear what she said, in her own words.
And even if she is some kind of nut, what does that mean?
Imagine if someone focused upon one of us on this forum, and then used the one person to represent everyone else on this forum. How accurate would that be?
It's all so obvious, but leads back to my assessment that pulling the plug on her, or on anyone, is censorship and is WRONG.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 21:54 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 22:06 last edited by
OK, Jon. You're right. She is an evil witch, and the culture she might represent is backwards and should be eliminated.
Do you have a picture where she spouts this stuff, and all the other doctors, from MD PhD to the MD/attorney agree with her cultural background?
You are right. The Masters of the Universe need to cancel people based upon their desires to control the thinking of all the stupid, gullible people. Then, the world will be a better place.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 22:07 last edited by
Here's a summary of the people involved:
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 22:18 last edited by
I mentioned I had a YouTube video where there was a picture of page after page, resumes of the doctors.
I went to the YouTube video, and it's gone! There is a notice that the video violated YouTube's terms of agreement.
Good job, YouTube. Bastards.
Give it a rest, Jon. It's not as important to me to "win" as it is to you, apparently.
You win. And I've got to get back to work.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 22:44 last edited by
I don't see why it's so hard to admit somebody's a nutter.
-
I don't see why it's so hard to admit somebody's a nutter.
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 22:47 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Removed:
I don't see why it's so hard to admit somebody's a nutter.
Like Jon said, I'm hydroxychloroquine agnostic, at least for now.
But to address your comment, if someone's a nutter on one thing, does that disqualify them on all things?
"I think the world is flat, but let me tell you about my theory on computer algorithms." The two are not mutually exclusive, are they?
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 22:50 last edited by Doctor Phibes
Yeah, and Hitler was a dog loving vegetarian. (I did it. I brought in Hitler!)
I'm completely agnostic on Hydro-thingie, too, but if I found out my GP believed in alien sperm and demon DNA, I'd change my GP.
-
Yeah, and Hitler was a dog loving vegetarian. (I did it. I brought in Hitler!)
I'm completely agnostic on Hydro-thingie, too, but if I found out my GP believed in alien sperm and demon DNA, I'd change my GP.
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 23:26 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Removed:
Yeah, and Hitler was a dog loving vegetarian. (I did it. I brought in Hitler!)
I'm completely agnostic on Hydro-thingie, too, but if I found out my GP believed in alien sperm and demon DNA, I'd change my GP.
This can be a fun game (and it even talks about dogs!): LBJ said that his dogs loved having their ears pulled - does that make his civil rights legislation invalid?
https://groovyhistory.com/lbj-dog-ears-beagle-lyndon-johnson
However, if my doc said those things, I'd probably switch as well.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 23:36 last edited by Doctor Phibes
If Hydro is effective, then we should definitely use it.
My question regarding that particular drug isn't whether it's effective, but why Donald Trump seems so keen on it. The other side have also politicised it shamelessly, but doesn't anybody find his enthusiasm just a tad suspicious?
-
OK, Jon. You're right. She is an evil witch, and the culture she might represent is backwards and should be eliminated.
Do you have a picture where she spouts this stuff, and all the other doctors, from MD PhD to the MD/attorney agree with her cultural background?
You are right. The Masters of the Universe need to cancel people based upon their desires to control the thinking of all the stupid, gullible people. Then, the world will be a better place.
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 23:38 last edited byOK, Jon. You're right. She is an evil witch, and the culture she might represent is backwards and should be eliminated.
Do you have a picture where she spouts this stuff, and all the other doctors, from MD PhD to the MD/attorney agree with her cultural background?
You are right. The Masters of the Universe need to cancel people based upon their desires to control the thinking of all the stupid, gullible people. Then, the world will be a better place.
Free speech? Fuggedaboutit...
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 23:46 last edited by
I'm not actually defending YouTube's behaviour which I think is wrong, but clearly they do have the right to do this, just as we had the right to ban that loony toon conspiracy guy from posting here.
Of course, everybody knows the correct way to try and stifle messages we don't like is by taking out a lawsuit.