Removed
-
I don't agree with their point, but that doesn't make them morons. Facebook or Twitter is the new town square and as such, people should be allowed to drool in public.
wrote on 28 Jul 2020, 16:35 last edited by -
wrote on 28 Jul 2020, 16:50 last edited by xenon
Facebook and Twitter are not a public square and never will be. They are built, owned and operated on private capital.
If the government wants a tech based public square, then build a public square... kinda like how they actually owned the airwaves for networks or how they used public dollars to build an actual physical public square.
It makes no sense to try and fit the concept of "public square" retroactively into private entities.
Social media legislation may be one of the most important thing to get right for the health of democracies going forward.
If Google thinks it's in their profit maximizing interest to ban Frontline Doctors on their platform - what should stop them from doing that?
-
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 03:29 last edited by Rainman
OK. As usual, after the video was taken down, the media explained the rationale. Removed from everywhere, except. . . BitChute.
I watched the whole thing. There was NOTHING said by any of the MD's as was reported by the media. There were even accusations of "witch doctor" and voodoo that I came across from those that scoffed at these doctors, justifying the correctness of the Masters of the Universe protecting us all from evil.
So, here it is. I'd be curious if this changes the opinions of those that believe censorship was anything other than politically driven:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HeC0tHZDX7dk/
Watch a few minutes, skip around, find the misinformation.
George and Bach, I'd be interested in your take. Maybe I'm missing something. But I'm comforted that if I am missing something, Ax will help find the hidden meanings. He's great at that, certainly better than me. Wish I could have embedded the video instead of just a link.
-
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 04:13 last edited by
It will be good to hear Ax's thoughts on it.
-
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 05:13 last edited by
Ax doesn't have thoughts. He waits until the democrats tell him what to think.
-
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 16:36 last edited by
-
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 22:53 last edited by
-
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 23:07 last edited by
If I had COVID, and the cocktail was offered, I'd take it.
-
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 23:09 last edited by jon-nyc
Demon semen, alien DNA, and hydroxychloroquine?
We gotta think of a name for that cocktail.
-
Demon semen, alien DNA, and hydroxychloroquine?
We gotta think of a name for that cocktail.
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 23:15 last edited by -
Demon semen, alien DNA, and hydroxychloroquine?
We gotta think of a name for that cocktail.
wrote on 29 Jul 2020, 23:30 last edited by -
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 02:03 last edited by
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 02:05 last edited by
By the way, I should say I remain personally agnostic about hydroxychloroquine. But there’s no question these crackpots that Trump touted are quacks.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 04:00 last edited by
Jon, I know I can come across as an idiot.
But I expect more from you.
Whatever you do, DO NOT look up the resumes of the participating doctors, it just might surprise you that your background does not come even close to their extraordinary backgrounds.Let's see if I can capture the contemporary perspective: If they drown, they're human, if they float, they are canceled. Simple!
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 12:29 last edited by Doctor Phibes
If you Google Doctor Stella Immanuel you'll find she certainly has an extraordinary background.
-
If you Google Doctor Stella Immanuel you'll find she certainly has an extraordinary background.
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 16:15 last edited by@Doctor-Phibes said in Removed:
If you Google Doctor Stella Immanuel you'll find she certainly has an extraordinary background.
Shut up, Orange Man Bad guy. TDS.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 21:24 last edited by
No, Aqua.
If I get time, I'll type out some of their resumes. Very impressive. I've got their resumes paused on a video, I don't know how to capture an image off of a video, which was taken before their web site was taken down.BUT THAT'S NOT THE POINT!
The overriding point is that the Masters of the Universe are at the forefront of cancel culture, and they could care less what anyone, including congress, says. They eliminated these physicians and by extension their expertise and input, by pulling them off of YouTube, Twitter, etc. Instead of supporting or bashing them in the public, they removed them all from the public square. Simple. Imagine having that kind of power!
That is past dangerous. That scares the shit out of me.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 21:33 last edited by
The bbc link is also just horseshit.
"And in 2005 she said. . . " (for example).Oh? This one doctor represents everyone else?
Maybe. But how about a screen shot of the actual tweet, or a video of what she said in a sermon, etc.Nope. It's all just to be taken in faith, the journalist does not need to provide actual evidence. I wonder why not? An actual video where we can see and hear what she said, in her own words.
And even if she is some kind of nut, what does that mean?
Imagine if someone focused upon one of us on this forum, and then used the one person to represent everyone else on this forum. How accurate would that be?
It's all so obvious, but leads back to my assessment that pulling the plug on her, or on anyone, is censorship and is WRONG.
-
wrote on 30 Jul 2020, 21:54 last edited by