More strange and/or foul reactions
-
wrote on 30 Oct 2023, 02:50 last edited by jon-nyc
-
wrote on 31 Oct 2023, 01:50 last edited by
-
wrote on 31 Oct 2023, 02:22 last edited by
Oh, I think Jared's program was doing better than most, before The Resident fucked it up
-
wrote on 1 Nov 2023, 11:43 last edited by George K 11 Jan 2023, 11:54
In 3 ½ weeks we went from "You can't have hateful speech" to "Kill the Jews."
ETA:
"Remember 2016-2020 when leftists claimed Nazis were everywhere, under every rock, it was just a matter of time til they were all revealed?
After the 10/7 attacks in Israel, it turns out they were right."
-
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 15:07 last edited by
-
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 15:12 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Makes you wonder if/when the MAGA crowd will realize
The MAGA crowd is generally very well educated and well informed.
-
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 15:14 last edited by
"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.
-
@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
Makes you wonder if/when the MAGA crowd will realize
The MAGA crowd is generally very well educated and well informed.
-
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 20:45 last edited by
@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.
Ok, replace with “support pro-Russia policies”. The point stands.
-
@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.
Ok, replace with “support pro-Russia policies”. The point stands.
wrote on 2 Nov 2023, 21:41 last edited by@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
@Horace said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
"Pro Russia" is a tribal strawman anyway, obviously.
Ok, replace with “support pro-Russia policies”. The point stands.
It's not much of a point if the policy is intended to be pro-USA.
-
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 02:13 last edited by
That seems nonsensical. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt if you’d like to explain. Maybe I’m missing something.
-
That seems nonsensical. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt if you’d like to explain. Maybe I’m missing something.
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 02:21 last edited by@jon-nyc said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
That seems nonsensical. But I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt if you’d like to explain. Maybe I’m missing something.
You can be specific about the pro-Russia policies you're referring to. If their intent is to support the usa, with an incidental side effect of being advantageous to Russia as compared to an opposing policy, then a framing that the policy is pro-russia, would be rhetorically disingenuous.
-
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 02:35 last edited by
I conceded your point and changed ‘being pro-Russia’ with ‘supporting pro-Russia policies’. The former implies motive the latter just effect.
Again the point stands.
-
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 02:42 last edited by
Your implications serve your technically standing point, but they are not a generally accepted interpretation of how that language works. If a policy drafted by a politician is said to be "pro-something or other", the intent will fairly be inferred. Your point stands, as long as we limit the audience to people who don't make the common assumptions that topple it. Fair enough.
-
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 03:37 last edited by Renauda 11 Mar 2023, 03:56
Okay.
Policies that serve or play into the interests of (insert name of country) that are detrimental to US ______ interests.
Now, move along.
-
Okay.
Policies that serve or play into the interests of (insert name of country) that are detrimental to US ______ interests.
Now, move along.
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 04:11 last edited byThis post is deleted! -
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 12:30 last edited by George K 11 Mar 2023, 12:31
-
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 12:38 last edited by
Like the lady from Apple, time to update the resume.
-
Like the lady from Apple, time to update the resume.
wrote on 3 Nov 2023, 12:40 last edited by@taiwan_girl said in More strange and/or foul reactions:
the lady from Apple
Is no longer employed there.
How is that pendant any different from wearing a swastika?
